web analytics
December 26, 2014 / 4 Tevet, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Writing Hashem’s Name

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah writes about the mitzvah to destroy avodah zarah. At the same time, the Torah says not to do avodah zarah to Hashem your God. As the pasuk says: “va’avaditam es shemam min hamakom hahu, lo sa’asun kein la’Hashem Elokeichem.” We derive from this pasuk that it is forbidden to erase Hashem’s name. The Minchas Chinuch (437:6) asks the following interesting question: how can one ever write “Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei” for the name of Hashem? After one writes the first two letters, he has written one of Hashem’s names, Yud Kei; when he continues to the next letter and writes a vav, he is destroying the name Yud Kei. It should therefore be impermissible to write the name of Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei.

One way to avoid this issue is by writing the name out of order. The Minchas Chinuch says that since we do not find that it is imperative to write the name of Hashem out of order, it must be permitted. The reason why it may be permitted is that it is destruction for the purpose of writing Hashem’s name – and there is no other way to do it.

Based on this, the Minchas Chinuch explains that we can understand the Gemara in Yuma 38a. The Gemara says there that there was a man who knew how to hold four kolmusin (quills) at once and write four letters at once. But he did not want to teach this feat to anyone, and the Gemara says that he is therefore considered a rasha. The Minchas Chinuch asks why he would be considered a rasha for not teaching his amazing trick to others. Maybe we could say he was not a nice guy – but a rasha? The Minchas Chinuch explains that the Chachamim understood that it would be better if the name of Hashem (Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei) would be fully written simultaneously, as this would avoid the abovementioned problem of erasing the name of Yud Kei that is written at the beginning of the name. Of course it is permitted to write the name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei, as the Minchas Chinuch explained. However, the Chachamim felt that if there was a better way to write it, we should utilize that way of writing it. If all the letters of Hashem’s name could be written at once, this problem would be avoided. But since this fellow did not wish to teach his feat to others, the Chachamim considered him a rasha.

The Dovev Meisharim (chelek 1, siman 18:3) quotes the Divrei Chaim that draws the opposite conclusion from the Gemara in Yuma. The Divrei Chaim says that writing simultaneously is considered out of order. By definition, in order means that it must be written in order – not simultaneously. Therefore, he says that it is clear from the Gemara that one does not need to write the name of Hashem in order.

Rav Akiva Eiger (Teshuvos Yoreh De’ah 276:11) quotes the Ginas Viradim (Orach Chaim 2:12, 13, written by the Pri Megadim) and the Shemesh Tzedakah (siman 52) that say that one must write the name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei in order. However, the other names of Hashem do not have to be written in order. Therefore, regarding the name Elokim, since one can write it out of order one should be obligated to do so, because when it is written in order the name Kel is written first and then erased when the letter vav is written. However, we do not find that one is required to write it out of order. The same should apply to the name Elokeinu, since after one has written Elokei the letter nun will erase Hashem’s name.

The Kiryas Sefer (Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah, perek 6) says that if one has in mind to write the name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei, when he writes the letters yud and kei they do not have kedushah and one is permitted to erase them. The same would apply to the name Kel from Elokim. This can better be explained as follows: The name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei and the name Yud Kei are two separate names. Thus, when one is writing the name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei the first two letters are part of that name and do not yet have kedushah. So when one writes them he can continue to write the letter vav, since the first two letters do not have kedushah. One may even be able to erase the letters yud kei even if he simply changed his mind. This is because they do not have kedushah when they are written as part of the four-letter name Yud, Kei, Vav, Kei.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Writing Hashem’s Name”

  1. Tim Upham says:

    You write HaShem's name using two yods. The first time I read a Siddur in Hebrew, I saw two yods. I had to stop and think what it meant. Then I realized it meant HaShem.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The Al Haeche kosher restaurant in Paris had bullet holes through the front window. Dec. 24, 2014.
Parisian Kosher Restaurant Second Anti-Semitic Gun Attack This Week
Latest Judaism Stories
Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The court cannot solely rely on death certificates issued by non-Jewish institutions without conducting its own investigation into the facts of the case.

Business-Halacha-logo

“I’m still not sure we have a right to damage his property,” said Mrs. Schloss. “Can you ask someone?”

Rabbi Sacks

Jacob’s blessing of Ephraim over Manasseh had nothing to do with age and everything to do with names

The Glory of Joseph

Slavery was universal; So, why was Egypt targeted in this object lesson?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

The first requirement is a king must admit when he is wrong.

Reward And Punishment
‘Masser Rishon For The levi’im’
(Yevamos 86a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Reb Shlomo Zalman could not endure honorifics applied to him because of his enormous humility

Because we see these events as world changing, as moments in history, they become part of us forever.

They stammer “I’m not Orthodox,” as if that absolves them from the responsibility of calling to G-d

It’s fascinating how sources attain the status “traditional,” or its equivalent level of kashrus.

She was determined that the Law class was Dina’s best chance of finding a husband, and that was the real reason she wanted her to go to college.

But who would have ever guessed that Hashem would unlock the key to the birth on same day as the English anniversary of our wedding.

Rabbi Fohrman explores the question of how God communicates with us today.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Rashi in Shabbos 9b writes that the reason why the tefillah of Ma’ariv is a reshus is because it was instituted corresponding to the burning of the eimurim from the korbanos – which was performed at night.

We find that in certain circumstances before the Torah was actually given, people were permitted to make calculations as to what would better serve Hashem, even if it were against a mitzvah or aveirah.

It is difficult to write about such a holy person, for I fear I will not accurately portray his greatness…

The implication of the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim 233:2) is that one may not daven Minchah before six and one half hours into the day.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/writing-hashems-name/2013/08/01/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: