web analytics
November 27, 2015 / 15 Kislev, 5776
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post

Dutch Funds Divest from Israeli Banks but not from Occupied Tibet

JewishPress Logo

A Dutch pension administrator has divested from five Israeli banks over their activity in the Judea and Samaria as a matter of “responsible investment policy” but it retains its investments in Chinese banks operating in Tibet on land widely seen internationally as land occupied by China.

The pension investment company PGGM announced its decision to divest from Bank HaPoalim, Bank Leumi, First International Bank of Israel, Israel Discount Bank and Mizrahi Tefahot Bank on Tuesday on its website.

The text cited the banks’ “involvement in financing Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. This was a concern, as the settlements in the Palestinian territories are considered illegal under international humanitarian law.”

PGGM had a marginal investment of several dozen millions of dollars in Israeli banks out of billions it invests all over the world, according to the NRC Handelsblad daily. The paper reported PGGM was Holland’s second-largest pension administrator.

In its statement, the company also cited its “responsible investment policy,” which excludes investing in bodies involved in “violations of fundamental human rights and labor rights.”

But according to a document released by the company in 2013, PGGM investments abroad include two Chinese banks – Bank of China and China Construction Bank — with offices and activities in Tibet, which is widely seen internationally as land occupied by China. PGGM also invests in China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, or Sinopec, which is exploring for oil in Tibet.

PGGM’s international investments also include the Malaysian palm oil producer Sime Darby, which last year paid a million dollars in reparations to villagers in Liberia amid accusations that the firm had violated their human rights and confiscated their property.

PGGM spokesperson Maurice Wilbrink declined to answer JTA’s questions on the scope of his company’s investments in Chinese firms active in Tibet, explaining the figures were confidential.

About the Author:

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Dutch Funds Divest from Israeli Banks but not from Occupied Tibet”

  1. Right here is the right blog for anyone who wishes to find out about this topic.
    You understand so much its almost tough to argue with you (not
    that I personally will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin
    on a subject that’s been discussed for decades. Excellent
    stuff, just wonderful!

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Mayflower Pilgrims, Obama and Syrian refugees.
Obama Compares First US Pilgrims with Syrian Refugees

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/dutch-funds-divest-from-israeli-banks-but-not-from-occupied-tibet/2014/01/08/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: