web analytics
October 30, 2014 / 6 Heshvan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Jordan’s Arab Bank Goes on Trial in NY for Terror Financing

It has taken 10 years to drag the Arab Bank into an American court room, but persistence finally won out.
US Supreme Court rejected a petition by the Arab Bank to hear its case, sending the case back to the lower court in Brooklyn.

US Supreme Court rejected a petition by the Arab Bank to hear its case, sending the case back to the lower court in Brooklyn.
Photo Credit: Nicolas Stambach

A worldwide legal earthquake is about to begin in Brooklyn, where the Jordan-based Arab Bank goes on trial today (Monday) for authorizing money transfers from terror entities to Hamas members abroad.

The case, a lawsuit by the families of US victims of terror, has been 10 years in the making and revolves around ‘martyr payments’ to the relatives of Hamas suicide bombers via the Jordan-based Arab Bank through its New York branch during the second intifada.

The plaintiffs claim in their suit the Bank has violated Section 2339B of Title 18 of the US Code, which makes it illegal for an entity within the United States to provide material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations. Hamas is included on that list. Attorney Gary Osen of Osen LLC is the lead attorney in the case.

This is the first-ever civil trial targeting terrorist financing, one that has dragged on for a decade because Arab Bank has worked just that hard to fight it — or at least to delay the proceedings as long as possible. When the Supreme Court rejected the Bank’s petition to hear the case in June, the way was paved for today’s hearing in Brooklyn.

In April 2013, a New York Federal Court penalizing the Bank with an order imposing sanctions for refusing to submit documents for review by the plaintiffs to determine whether they could be used as evidence in the case.

That order raised Cain between three agencies at the federal level in the Obama administration – the US State Department, the Justice Department, and the Treasury Department – as officials tried to decide just how to deal with this delicate but dirty matter that affects not one, but at least two or more of America’s closest allies in the Middle East.

The Bank claimed it refused to submit the documents because it could have violated bank secrecy laws in Jordan and Lebanon. The lower US court was having none of that and ruled a jury could interpret that to mean an automatic admission of guilt on the part of the Bank.

In a pre-trial statement to Forbes, the Bank commented, “The facts show that Arab Bank provided routine banking service in compliance with applicable counter terrorism laws and regulations, and had no intention of providing support to Hamas or any other known terrorist organization.”

The Bank is accused of facilitating massive money transfers from 1998 to 2004 to Hamas leaders and institutions, as well as to the families of jailed Hamas members and suicide bombers. The money allegedly came from insurance benefits provided by the Saudi Committee and the Hezbollah al-Shahid Foundation. Both supported the intifada by providing benefits to the families of those who “martyred” themselves or who became injured or captured by the IDF in the process.

The insurance was “ultimately designed to provide substantial material support to Palestinian terrorist organizations and to provide a meaningful incentive both to prospective recruits and to individuals contemplating the commission of independent acts of violence in the name of the ‘popular resistance’,” according to the complaint, as quoted by Business Insider.

There were five attacks specified in the complaint in which Arab Bank allegedly facilitated money transfers to the relatives of Hamas terrorists. One was the October 2003 case of John Linde Jr., murdered with two other security officers while escorting US diplomats to interview Palestinian Arab candidates for Fulbright Scholarships. The three were killed by an IED (improvised explosive device, also known as a ‘homemade bomb’) in northern Gaza. A second involved 3-year-old Tehilla Nathansen, killed while sitting on her mother’s lap when terrorists blew up the No. 2 bus in Jerusalem in August 2003. A third child, 8th grader Jacob Mandell, was killed in a hail of rocks hurled by attacking Palestinian Arabs along with another friend while hiking in May 2001. And so on.

The plaintiffs allege that because the Arab Bank knew the funds were related to terror groups and terror activities, the Bank bears civil liability for the deaths of victims of terror resulting from attacks by those who received those funds.

The families of the terror victims are suing the Bank for damages to compensate for the murders of their loved ones.

The wire transfers were allegedly sent from terrorist sources to other international terrorists, among them Gaza’s current Hamas de facto Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, and former Hamas commanders Salah Shehada and Ahmed Jabari – now dead – as well as Hamas co-founder Ibrahim al-Muqadama.

The Bank contends there is no proof the funds went to terrorists and claims there is no proof the funds contributed directly to any terror attack. The Bank also claims the transfers were made without the institution’s knowledge of breaking the law at the time.

As the case has made its way through the court system, the picture has become clearer. Some of the past funding sources in dispute had received transfers themselves from the US government and were declared “terror free.” But some of this evidence has since been thrown out of court as “too general.”

But there is also a question of responsibility on the part of the US government, which allegedly has not always make clear who should be held responsible for what, or when. The Bank raised the issue of whether some of the funding sources were on the watch list of the US Office of Foreign Assets Control at the time of transfer – which may be a legitimate claim.

The US government, meanwhile, has slammed the lower court for not fully considering the foreign policy consequences of ignoring Jordan’s sovereign interests in this case. The Arab Bank is Jordan’s national bank, and if it loses the case, the Obama administration contends that the Jordanian economy and possibly the country’s motivation for counter terror cooperation with the United States could go up in smoke.

In May, the US government did not ask the Supreme Court to intervene pre-trial — and the Supreme Court rejected the Arab Bank’s petition to hear its case. But the Obama administration has made it clear that if Jordan’s interests are not taken into account, the government reserves the right to intervene, post-trial.

About the Author: Hana Levi Julian is a Middle East news analyst with a degree in Mass Communication and Journalism from Southern Connecticut State University. A past columnist with The Jewish Press and senior editor at Arutz 7, Ms. Julian has written for Babble.com, Chabad.org and other media outlets, in addition to her years working in broadcast journalism.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “Jordan’s Arab Bank Goes on Trial in NY for Terror Financing”

  1. Hamas are millionaires from UN funds

  2. Hamas terrorists must be estimated from the face of this earth

  3. Terror is all over the world, it is suprising that many people hate Israel and USA when fighting against terrorism,it seems they don’t recognise danger ahead of them.

  4. Terror is all over the world, it is suprising that many people hate Israel and USA when fighting against terrorism,it seems they don’t recognise danger ahead of them.

  5. no surprise, but thank goodness we’re on top of it. Where are you, Standwithus, in organizing a rally around this event? It’s important.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Abbas and the Temple Mount: "It's mine, all mine. No Jews allowed.
Abbas Declares Closure of Al Aqsa Mosque a ‘Declaration of War’
Latest News Stories
Tour guide Yehuda Glick (right) leading a group on Temple Mount.

Highlight: Exclusive Interview with Rabbi Yehuda Glick at the Foot of the Temple Mount.

Doctors reported as of 8 p.m. (2 p.m. EDT) Thursday night that there is a “very small” improvement in the condition of Yehuda Glick, gunned down by an Arab terrorists Wednesday night, but that he still is in critical condition and his life remains in danger.

Sweden's new Prime Minister Stefan Löfven - does he know the difference between IKEA and the Middle East?

Israel has ordered its ambassador to Sweden to return home and has “invited” the Swedish envoy to Israel for a “talk” following Stockholm’s decision Thursday to recognize the Palestinian Authority as a country. Lieberman stated flat out that Sweden’s new prime minister, Stefan Löfven, “acted before he had time even to study the issue in […]

Chairman Robert Sugarman and Executive Vice Chairman Malcolm Hoenlein from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Feb. 17, 2014

Conference of Jewish groups chided the Obama administration for the nasty comments made about Bibi.

Feiglin was standing next to Glick during the assassination attempt

A small caliber weapon was used to shoot at IDF troops patrolling along the border near Quneitra.

Abbas didn’t even condemn the shooting of Temple Mount activist Yehuda Glick.

Arab rioters threw firecrackers at Border Police in the Old City in Jerusalem Thursday and lightly wounded at least one tourist. Police arrested one Arab youth. Earlier in the day, Arabs hurled rocks at a bus in eastern Jerusalem. No property damage or injuries were reported, and one Arab was arrested. In the Jabel Mukaber […]

The Islamic Jihad was thrilled with the shooting of Temple Mount activist Yehuda Glick and said “he got what he deserved, the Mann reported. Daoud Shihab, Islamic Jihad spokesperson, told Ma’an that attempted murder of Glick, who is in critical condition as of this moment, was a “natural response” to defend Jerusalem” and the Al-Aqsa […]

A cartoonist has turned the tables on an attack cartoon against the PM published by the leftist daily Ha’aretz.

Rabbi Yehuda Glick’s condition has taken a turn for the worse. He needs prayers. Yehuda Yehoshua ben Rivka Itta Breindel.

The father and brother of the Islamic Jihad terrorist who allegedly shot Temple Mount activist Yehudah Glick were arrested Thursday in Silwan.

The “silent” intifada is roaring at the gates, Harriet, and threatening to bash the door in. It’s silent no more. Who’s really inciting terrorism?

Female tourist injured when struck by rocks thrown by Arabs at the Kotel.

Jerusalem Arabs are rioting near the home of the killed terrorist in the neighborhood of Abu Tor.

China has acquired $7 billion in Israeli assets in the past three years.

More Articles from Hana Levi Julian

Rabbi Yehuda Glick’s condition has taken a turn for the worse. He needs prayers. Yehuda Yehoshua ben Rivka Itta Breindel.

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat  at the Temple Mount on October 28, 2014.

The “silent” intifada is roaring at the gates, Harriet, and threatening to bash the door in. It’s silent no more. Who’s really inciting terrorism?

PM Netanyahu blames PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas for terror attack aimed at killing Temple Mount activist Yehudah Glick.

Iran claims to have foiled a sabotage attack on tanks used to transport nuclear “heavy water.”

Sweden’s new prime minister-elect has recognized the so-called ‘state of Palestine,’ albeit illegal, without borders.

Knesset members express fury at assassination attempt by an Islamic Jihad terrorist against Temple Mount activist Yehuda Glick Wednesday night.

Canadian law enforcement officials to counsel wannabe jihadis and try to find them jobs in a program aimed at prevention.

Lawmakers across spectrum uphold ban keeping Balad MK Hanin Zoabi out of the Knesset.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/jordans-arab-bank-on-trial-in-ny-for-terror-financing/2014/08/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: