Photo Credit: Liz Kaszynski / Flash 90
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Not even off the lot, the Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet is turning into an even bigger lemon than first anticipated by Israeli politicians who fought the deal forced on the Jewish State with a U.S. military aid package by the White House.

A story published over the weekend on the U.S. Air Force website revealed “the F-35 has a fuel temperature threshold, and may not function properly if the fuel temperature is too high.”

Advertisement

The problem was troubling enough that seven USAF bases are testing new ways to “mitigate any possible aircraft shutdowns due to high fuel temperatures in the future,” according to the report” quoted by Defense Aerospace.com.

So far, one fuel tanker has been painted white – at a cost of $3,900 – at Edwards Air Force Base, California, in an attempt to “ensure the F-35 is able to meet its sortie requirements.”

The same idea was tried at Luke AFB shortly after, according to the report, because at Luke, “temperatures can reach beyond 110 degrees (Farenheit).” It was believed that painting the tanks white would “help prevent fuel stored in the tanks from overheating.”

But some technicians came up with an even better idea: “This is the short-term goal to cool the fuel for the F-35; however, the long-term fix is to have parking shades for the refuelers,” according to Chief Master Sgt. Ralph Resch, the 56th LRS fuels manager for the 56th Logistics Readiness Squadron at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.

Bright white paint may cool off the fuel tankers but it will heat up a conflict in the Middle East faster than you can say “hot target in sight!”

Moreover, many areas of the Middle East reach beyond 120 degrees Farenheit during the summer months. Needless to say, a summer war is also much easier to fight than one in the winter, even without such encouragement. Add in the disadvantage of a fighter jet whose fuel broils in the sun, and the average enemy force would be silly not to plan for a summer conflict.

Nevertheless, Israel ordered its first lot of 19 of the F-35s in 2010 for $2.75 billion, to be delivered in December 2016.

Earlier this month, the cabinet voted to approve a reduced order to buy an additional 14 of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter jets. Also approved was an option to order another 17 of the warplanes in 2017.

A final deal to purchase a total of 50 of the warplanes for two squadrons was approved by the Israeli government cabinet in October of this year, at a cost well above the original price tag.

A ministerial panel headed by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and then-Defense Minister Ehud Barak made the initial approval in September 2010 for the purchase of 20 F-35 fighter jets.

That decision was made despite intense opposition from a number of senior defense officials over the high cost of the deal. For a price of nearly $3 billion, Israel would receive the 20 F-35s in 2016, with an option to buy another 75 of the aircraft.

The F-35 already had numerous design compromises at that point that irked Israeli leaders. Many Israeli systems were rejected by the U.S. government, which refused to allow Lockheed Martin to install them on the aircraft.

Because Israel does not have full control over the design and modifications on the F-35, including access to the aircraft’s software codes, its use to the IDF is limited.

By May 2011, Israeli defense officials told the World Tribune the problems with the F-35 were “much worse than we had been told.”

Two months later, the U.S. agreed to allow F-35s purchased by Israel to be rewired in order to accommodate the installation of Israeli electronic warfare system and eventual additions of other sensors and other systems.

Advertisement

1
2
SHARE
Previous articleThe King and the Court Jew
Next articleLate Entertainer Joan Rivers Enriches Jewish Causes
Hana Levi Julian is a Middle East news analyst with a degree in Mass Communication and Journalism from Southern Connecticut State University. A past columnist with The Jewish Press and senior editor at Arutz 7, Ms. Julian has written for Babble.com, Chabad.org and other media outlets, in addition to her years working in broadcast journalism.

15 COMMENTS

  1. USA military engineering process sucks, that’s why defects, which can be fixed in a snap, accumulate, and field technicians, lacking solutions, invent “creative” workarounds. That’s why it’s crucial for Israel to have an ability to fix things in place, like it’s done for most US military equipment.

  2. I very Sorry to say this but The Israeli Government Deserves this for cancelling the Lavi Project. The Next Generation of the Lavi would have been an equivalent of the F-35. Unfortunately The Government is built up of Politicians Who Sit in a Parliament in Israel Called The Knesset. A Large group of Baboons is called a Parliament of Boboons.

  3. Because the F-35 was designed (intended) to be all things for all services—the big selling point Lockheed used to reel in the contract—it is one of the most complex fighter jets ever to take to the air, and yet will not be the universal-roll aircraft promised. It will likely set records for post-production development fixes, which might not be so bad in any arms system if the manufacturers suffered the cost of the difficulties governments pay so dearly to absorb.

    But for the F-35, this fuel problem is yet another reason it CANNOT begin to replace the A-10 for close-air support of front-line troops and tank units, where special provisions for aircraft complexities cannot be met and at the same time provide timely support in mission- and life-critical situations for soldiers aircraft are tasked to support.

  4. Some problems can't be solved with technical fixes, if the problems are built into the basic design. According to the Rand Corporation a "Think Tank" based in California that work closely with the US military, made the following statements with regards to the F35. The aircraft is overweight and underpowered, has serious design and structural problems, can't turn, can't climb and the stealth shape and coating doesn't work very well ! In conclusion in wargame scenarios this plane was unable to hold its own against older fighter designs that are currently serving in the Chinese and Russian air forces. Words used to describe this aircraft by pilots and engineers working with a machine are as follows: A Dog, a Lemon, Double Inferior !! The Last comment is pertaining to its inability to climb and turn in a dogfight.

    To purchase this machine would be extremely unwise.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...