Outposts Committee Report: Judea and Samaria Are Not Occupied Territories
print
tell a friend
Former Justice Edmond Levy's committee report declares Israel's legal right to own Judea and Samaria.
Photo Credit: Photo by Kobi Gideon / Flash90
Judea and Samaria are not under occupation rule. This is the central finding of the “Outposts Committee” which was appointed to examine the legal status of Israel in Judea and Samaria, according to the daily Makor Rishon. The committee members, former Supreme Court Justice Edmond Levy, Circuit Judge Techia Shapira and jurist Dr. Allan Baker, this week have concluded the writing of their report which suggests adopting a new and old judicial framework regarding Israel’s status in Judea and Samaria.
The committee analyzed the historic and legal background of Judea and Samaria and concludes that the belligerent occupation approach must be discarded as reflecting Israel’s status in those areas. According to the committee’s approach, Judea and Samaria were in a judicial vacuum before the Six Day War. The reason was that the Kingdom of Jordan, which held those territories, did so against the rule of international law, and its sovereignty over them was recognized solely by Great Britain. Since Jordan was not the legal sovereign, the report argues, the territories cannot be defined as occupied in the legal sense of the word.
In addition, the committee offers a string of arguments showing that Israel itself has a legal connection to those territories, which is another reason why it is not an occupier.
The 90 page report, including addenda, discusses at length the issue of the outposts. Levy, Baker and Shapira fundamentally reject the legal line used by Attorney Talia Sasson in her report on the outposts. To their understanding, the vast majority of outposts can be defined as legal, since they are within the master planned areas of legal settlements whose establishment was approved by the government.
The committee further recommends that the Nature and Parks Authority declare thousands of acres in the Judea and Samaria as national parks, to facilitate the preservation of their environmental resources.
With the conclusion of the committee’s work the ball returns to the court of Prime Minister Netanyahu and Justice Minister Ne’eman, who ordered the report. Prior to the committee’s appointment the Attorney General informed Netanyahu that the judiciary is not obligated to follow its conclusions. Netanyahu told committee members that he wishes to read the report before deciding on his next steps.
The next phase is expected to include bringing the report before the Ministers Committee on the Settlements, but the main question remains whether Netanyahu and Ne’eman will be able to force the judiciary system to adopt its recommendations.
It should be noted that committee members belong to Israel’s judicial elite. Chairman Edmond Levy was considered unique among Supreme Court justice in his sensitivity to social issues. Techia Shapira is a sitting Circuit Judge in Tel Aviv. Dr. Allan Baker is an expert on international law and served as legal consultant to the foreign office. Among other things, he participated in formulating the Oslo Accords.
tell a friendAbout the Author:
You might also be interested in:
You must log in to post a comment.
No Responses to “Outposts Committee Report: Judea and Samaria Are Not Occupied Territories”
2
Loading ...
http://myrightword.blogspot.co.il/2012/06/liberation-from-aaron-baraks.html more info.
This needs to be read and shared. Anyone who knows history can only reiterate that land held under Jordanian control cannot be considered "occupied" by Israel.
It's written that "According to the committee’s approach, Judea and Samaria were in a judicial vacuum before the Six Day War. The reason was that the Kingdom of Jordan, which held those territories, did so against the rule of international law"…. so how can anyone get from it that the land cannot be occupied by Israel? Prior to that it was a Jewish land.
prior to 1948 when jordan took possession of the west bank, the land was NOT "jewish," it was ENGLISH. and those territories were stipulated to be part of the palestinian partition.
Israel gadol
The land of Israel–is God given–and belongs exclusively to the Jews!
according to the torah, the land belongs to the descendants of abraham, who are not exclusively jews!
The problem is not in the land, but in the people.
Judea and Samaria are the eastern part of the State of Israel!
"the Kingdom of Jordan, which held those territories, did so against the rule of international law, and its sovereignty over them was recognized solely by Great Britain."
This is not entirely true. While only two countries (the UK and Pakistan) recognized the *de jure* annexation of Judea and Samaria by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. But in fact, every country in the world respected the Jordanian passports granted to its residents, and accepted the civilian government there — including Medinat Yisrael, which continued to have Jordanian civil servants perform governmental functions, including schools with Jordanian textbooks. Israel even accepted the Jordanian government's expropriation of private property such as the Rockefeller Museum. Essentially, the world — including Israel — recognized the *de facto* rule by Jordan.
Also, who cares? It's not Israel vs. Jordan, as Jordan no longer claims the WB. It's Israel vs. Palestine and the entire world accepts the Palestinian right to the WB, with Israel's being entitled to some minor territorial modifications.
In 1967, then legal counsel to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs Theodor Meron said that not only was it an occupation, but it was a violation of the Geneva Conventions. My how 45 years of war crimes changes one's tune.
http://southjerusalem.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/theodor-meron-legal-opinion-on-civilian-settlement-in-the-occupied-territories-september-1967.pdf
This ruling also ignores and invalidates every single international agreement relating to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict Israel has ever signed.