A source close to Aharon Friedman, the estranged husband of Tamar Epstein, is denying a report that he has granted his wife a religious writ of divorce, or get.

This week, the Organization for the Resolution of Agunot, or ORA, issued a flyer and fundraising call announcing that “Tamar is Free,” leading to an erroneous JTA report that Epstein’s case was resolved with the awarding of a get. According to Orthodox law, a divorce is not complete until a husband gives his wife a get; women whose husbands refuse them gets are known as agunot, or “chained” wives.

Advertisement

Though the couple was divorced in civil court years ago, Friedman, an aide to Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Ways and Means Committee, has been the subject of a years-long campaign by Epstein and her advocates to shame Friedman into giving Epstein a get.

On Friday, the source close to Friedman told JTA that he did not give Epstein a get. Friedman declined to speak on the record to JTA.

When contacted by JTA, Meira Zack, assistant director of ORA, pointedly refused to say whether or not Epstein had been given a get and did not explain why the organization considers Tamar “free.” Zack maintains that ORA was authorized by Epstein to make the announcement. Epstein could not be reached for comment.

“All I can say is that Tamar is now free and the case is resolved from our end,” Zack told JTA. “We are not in a position to share more information at this time at Tamar’s request. We have been very careful in saying simply that the case has been resolved. Any other suppositions that people have made have been their suppositions.”

Aside from the granting of a get, the only other means for freeing Epstein from her husband according to Orthodox law would be through an annulment of the marriage by a religious court — an extraordinary move that in Epstein’s case likely would be subject to dispute.

Advertisement

10 COMMENTS

  1. We don’t know the anonymous source, his/her relationship to the story or with Aharon, nor the circumstances of the journalist’s dialogue with any parties involved. If Aharon gave the get, I’m sure there’d be a mutual agreement (and desire for their child’s sake) to cease further press communication. In that case, the divorced couple’s silence and ORA’s refusal to elaborate further would make sense. This leaves an elephant in the room to address, but ORA’s hands are probably tied – they are not really authorized to speak for Tamar at this point. There are people on both sides with great emotional stakes in this case, and the “fake get story” rumor will be too delicious to resist. There will probably always be some frum Donald Trump type out there questioning Tamar’s get and shouting “I want to see the certificate!”

  2. We don't know the anonymous source, his/her relationship to the story or with Aharon, nor the circumstances of the journalist's dialogue with any parties involved. If Aharon gave the get, I'm sure there'd be a mutual agreement (and desire for their child's sake) to cease further press communication. In that case, the divorced couple's silence and ORA's refusal to elaborate further would make sense. This leaves an elephant in the room to address, but ORA's hands are probably tied – they are not really authorized to speak for Tamar at this point. There are people on both sides with great emotional stakes in this case, and the "fake get story" rumor will be too delicious to resist. There will probably always be some frum Donald Trump type out there questioning Tamar's get and shouting "I want to see the certificate!"

Loading Facebook Comments ...