Photo Credit: flickr.com
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso (seen with the "Baroness" Catherine Ashton) threatens that an independent Scotland would find it “difficult, if not impossible” to gain EU membership. Democracy? We don't need no stinking democracy…

We tend to think of the European Union as a kind of continental USA, America with a better cuisine: a loosely united group of individual states who continue to run their internal business, but collaborate on issues concerning their neighbors.

But the last few years in which the EU’s less robust economies, such as Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal, to name a few, have experienced a terrifying upheaval whose end is not yet in sight, taught all of us a lesson in freedom of choice a la Union Européenne. Those economies have had to tow the line and impose austerity on their own people, or risk the economic wrath of the big states, most notably Germany.

Advertisement

Over in Israel we’ve observed the bullying methods being employed as we speak by the EU, to produce an outcome palatable to them in a dispute between Jews and Arabs. The kind of relentless, aggressive pressure these Europeans have been using, threatening an academic boycott, a scientific boycott, boycotts on goods, boycotts on tourism – that we know these are not nice people.

But did you know whose neck really gets to be directly under the European Union’s boot, which presses down metaphorically with the same zeal and determination as those great soldiers of the Fatherland used to do? The Europeans themselves. Or rather, the Europeans who wish to change the status quo.

Scotland is about to vote, this coming September 18, on a referendum on whether it should become an independent country. As a result of an agreement between the Scottish Government and the UK, the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill, was passed by the Scottish Parliament on November 14, 2013, and received Royal Assent in December (the equivalent of the president signing a new law). The Scottish parliament wants the referendum question to be: “Should Scotland be an independent country?”

The main issues Scotland would have to deal with should it become independent are the economy, defense, relations with the rest of the UK, and membership of supranational organizations, especially the EU and NATO.

I would think that this would be viewed by any democratically minded person with admiration: a substantial sector within a democratic state wishes to disengage and the process is being handled without bloodshed, through legal channels, with everyone’s rights (well, most everyone) being observed.

Over in Brussels they’re not nearly as excited about the whole thing.

An independent Scotland would find it “difficult, if not impossible” to gain EU membership and obtain the acceptance of other EU member states, declared European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.

In an interview with the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Barroso said, “In case there is a new country, a new state, coming out of a current member state, it will have to apply and… the application and the accession to the European Union will have to be approved by all the other member states of the European Union.”

Seriously? It’s not majority rule, but unanimous now? Is he going royal all of a sudden?

Imagine, a people have decided to change their political direction, and they’ve gone about doing it in the most civilized manner – and this Portuguese bureaucrat says they’ll be boycotted, unless every last member approves their acceptance into the EU. And we know how he’s going to vote.

There’s a good reason why the oligarchs in Brussels don’t want to let Scotland be free, even if the UK accepts it. It’s called Catalonia, an autonomous community at the north-eastern corner of Spain, designated a “nationality” by its own Statute of Autonomy. Catalonia is by far the most economically dynamic region of Spain, and, listen to this: the Catalan government has announced its intention to hold a referendum on possible independence from Spain this year.

Advertisement

4 COMMENTS

  1. I can't fully agree with this analysis. The Scots may just as well be nursing a Skull-Splitter Ale, or ale from one of the other 75 breweries in Scotland, but may have to pay an import fee for Old Peculier, made in Theakston. I can think of much worse fates than that. Go Catalonia!

  2. Go for it Scotland. Who in their right mind would want to "belong" to the EU? Why should EU rules take precedence over ANY MEMBER COUNTRIES laws? The EU seems to think that they are kings, in total charge. Stuff them, we should all revert to National rules of our own countries.

  3. One should take into account where most of the EU offices are situated and who is the so-called "president" of the EU.
    Right, Belgium.
    A big part of the Belgium establishment is "Francophone", which means exactly they want Belgium to continue, as it is now.
    Many in the Dutch speaking part of this non-state want Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of the country, to become independent.
    Now then, the French speaking part of Belgium and the Francophones hope that the EU will eventually take away nationalities, and the wish of the Flemish people to become completely independent of the French speakers, the Francophones and yes, the influence of France.
    Yes, the country that does everything to kill off the Flemish origin and language in the north of France.
    If the Scottish people and Scotland becomes an independent state, it might be understandable that other people in Europe want to become independent, so Spain, France, England, Belgium, and other countries will do anything to use the EU as a threat.
    That is why the EU, the most undemocratic political is getting more and more nervous, helped by the growth of the anti-EU political parties in Europe.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...