web analytics
April 18, 2015 / 29 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


Did Congress Intentionally Remove Iran Military Option?

Did congressional leaders intentionally remove the military option against Iran in the letters they are circulating to send to Obama?
U.S. Capitol.

U.S. Capitol.
Photo Credit: WhiteHouse.Gov

U.S. lawmakers will be sending two letters to President Obama later this week.

Both letters purport to send strong messages regarding Iran. Both disappoint. What’s worse, the Senate’s letter may actually be an admission of retreat.

LETTER FROM HOUSE LEADERS

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) have sent a letter addressed to the president to their colleagues, from whom they hope to collect signatures.

A letter, of course, does not have the power to direct the president to take the action congress wishes. It is of even lesser weight than is a resolution, which the House passed last summer, urging stricter sanctions to be adopted against Iran.

The letter recounts what everyone should already know: that given Iran’s history of deception, lies and delaying tactics, everyone should be worried that the Islamic regime is merely duping the West and will use the lengthy negotiations process as a way to “make progress towards a nuclear program.”

The flaccid language of the letter must be alarming to U.S. allies in the Middle East who recognize the real danger of a nuclear Iran, while providing glee to the Iranian regime.

We are hopeful a permanent diplomatic agreement will require dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear weapons-related infrastructure, including enrichment-, heavy water-, and reprocessing-related facilities, such that Iran will not be able to develop, build, or acquire a nuclear weapon.

We do not seek to deny Iran a peaceful nuclear energy program, but we are gravely concerned that Iran’s industrial-scale uranium enrichment capability and heavy water reactor being built at Arak could be used for the development of nuclear weapons.

This is the strongest language someone with the alleged clout of Rep. Eric Cantor could rustle up?

The lawmakers finally start in with the “must” word about halfway through the letter. Iran must be transparent, allow inspections, provide interviews, and answer questions already issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency, but long left unanswered.

Iran, of course, has been ignoring those requirements for years, even when the U.S. and other western nations girded the requirements with far more stringent language than is found in this letter. The idea that these demands might be met when the U.S. has already signaled its willingness to retreat when met with intransigence borders on an insult to constituents.

SENATE’S LETTER RELEASED BY AIPAC

Over on the Senate side, a somewhat stronger sounding letter is being circulated to colleagues by Charles Schumer (D-NY), , Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.). This letter was released to the public by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee on Sunday, March 2.

AIPAC desperately needed a show of strength, or at least activity, with respect to Iran. This is because its support for tougher sanctions against Iran shamefully petered out in the face of a strong pushback by the administration, with forceful assistance provided by certain members of congress who share the president’s political party.

But despite the rhetorical bravado, there is something very frightening about the way the letter ends.

Should negotiations fail or should Iran violate the Joint Plan of Action, Congress will need to ensure that the legislative authority exists to rapidly and dramatically expand sanctions. We need to work together now to prepare for either eventuality.

Most importantly, Iran must clearly understand the consequences of failing to reach an acceptable agreement. We must signal unequivocally to Iran that rejecting negotiations and continuing its nuclear weapon program will lead to much more dramatic sanctions, including further limitations on Iran’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products.

Do you see it? Now the greatest threat Iran faces is that the U.S. may impose strict sanctions. Before, the sanctions were in place in order to bring Iran to the bargaining table, and the ultimate threat was that “all options remained on the table, including the military one.”

Something has been pulled from the table. We’re marching backwards.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “Did Congress Intentionally Remove Iran Military Option?”

  1. I am with drawing and voting for bill gates for president of the world ok/

  2. Bill gates has a plan to Reduce the population. Does that tell you Anything?

  3. the world's greatest deliberative body can't think it's way out of a wet paper bag.

  4. Dede Irish says:

    depopulation is a the goal of our elite and overpopulation is a lie.

  5. H Fragman Abramson says:

    Perhaps that big US threat is why Russia/Putin won't be dissuaded from Empire building too…

  6. Well,,do we even have a military anymore,,go figure.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
U.S. President Barack Obama
Obama’s Creativity: Signing Bonus Substituting for Sanctions Lifting
Latest News Stories
U.S. President Barack Obama

Obama to maintain phased-in sanctions relief pegged to compliance; he’ll give Iran a huge signing bonus instead!

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat at the scene where a Shalom Yochai Sherki was killed and Shira Klein was injured when an Arab crashed his car crashed into a bus station at the French Hill junction in Jerusalem on April 15.

She is unconscious and on a respirator at Hadassah Ein Karem hospital.

Philanthropist A. Alfred Taubman died on Friday at the age of 91.

Alfred Taubman, who helped shopping in the United States by developing malls, died of a heart attack while at home on Friday, He was 91. Taubman was known for philanthropy, especially in his native Michigan, where was a large contributor to the Detroit Institute of Arts. “Al Taubman changed the way America shops. But his […]

S300

In the past, both Russia and Israel stopped their weapons sales to avoid excess friction between the countries. Not anymore.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara visited on Saturday night the grave of Yoni Netanyahu, the leader and lone IDF casualty in the rescue mission at Entebbe in 1976. They visited the grave at the Mt. Herzl Cemetery at night instead of on Remembrance Day for the Fallen of Israel’s Wars this week […]

Is Afghanistan becoming another country that US has made safe for the Islamic State?

This could be a lead-up to a joint ground operation in Yemen against the Iranian backed Houthis.

Netanyahu’s “humanitarian considerations” are a euphemism for political considerations.”

The hackers used easily downloadable, but sophisticated, hacking tools to do the job, rather than requiring any in-house technical knowledge.

The wannabe terrorist wanted to be arrested more than he actually wanted to stab the soldier.

Israeli workers raise a large Star of David (Magen David) onto the “Harp Bridge” at the entrance of Jerusalem on April 17, 2015, in honor of Israel’s upcoming Israel’s Memorial Day and the 67th Independence Day. Israel will mark its 67th Independence Day on April 22, 2015.

First thwarted at the Israeli polls, now V15 funder’s “healthy” bars are also losers.

She had many names and was many things to many people, but to me she was just Babineni.

The EU wants to label Settler products. Liberman want to remind them of the last time they labeled Jews.

A pro-BDS professor at Sydney University may face disciplinary action over his conduct at lecture where anti-Israelis disrupted a speech by retired British Col. Richard Kemp, who has often praised  the IDF for its morality while fighting terror. The university issued a “show cause” letter to Prof. Jake Lynch, according to The Australian. Jewish students […]

Liberman is adamantly insisting on receiving the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but Netanyahu wants Liberman to step back and take something else.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
U.S. President Barack Obama

Obama to maintain phased-in sanctions relief pegged to compliance; he’ll give Iran a huge signing bonus instead!

Daniel Lubetzky  president of V15 and CEO of Kind "healthy" bars

First thwarted at the Israeli polls, now V15 funder’s “healthy” bars are also losers.

12 Christian Africans ‘thrown overboard’ by Muslim African migrants

Some American Jews continue lobbying Obama to more aggressively undermine Israel

Suspected vehicular terrorist attack in Jerusalem neighborhood; two seriously wounded.

The US is removing Cuba from list of state sponsors of terrorism. But Cuba’s recent BFF, Iran, doesn’t have such a clean record.

Congressional oversight of Iran bill unanimously passes Committee, President no longer threatens veto.

With latest compromises, Congressional oversight of Iran deal believed to be solidly veto-proof.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/did-congress-intentionally-remove-military-option-from-the-table/2014/03/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: