web analytics
May 28, 2015 / 10 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


Did Congress Intentionally Remove Iran Military Option?

Did congressional leaders intentionally remove the military option against Iran in the letters they are circulating to send to Obama?
U.S. Capitol.

U.S. Capitol.
Photo Credit: WhiteHouse.Gov

U.S. lawmakers will be sending two letters to President Obama later this week.

Both letters purport to send strong messages regarding Iran. Both disappoint. What’s worse, the Senate’s letter may actually be an admission of retreat.

LETTER FROM HOUSE LEADERS

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) have sent a letter addressed to the president to their colleagues, from whom they hope to collect signatures.

A letter, of course, does not have the power to direct the president to take the action congress wishes. It is of even lesser weight than is a resolution, which the House passed last summer, urging stricter sanctions to be adopted against Iran.

The letter recounts what everyone should already know: that given Iran’s history of deception, lies and delaying tactics, everyone should be worried that the Islamic regime is merely duping the West and will use the lengthy negotiations process as a way to “make progress towards a nuclear program.”

The flaccid language of the letter must be alarming to U.S. allies in the Middle East who recognize the real danger of a nuclear Iran, while providing glee to the Iranian regime.

We are hopeful a permanent diplomatic agreement will require dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear weapons-related infrastructure, including enrichment-, heavy water-, and reprocessing-related facilities, such that Iran will not be able to develop, build, or acquire a nuclear weapon.

We do not seek to deny Iran a peaceful nuclear energy program, but we are gravely concerned that Iran’s industrial-scale uranium enrichment capability and heavy water reactor being built at Arak could be used for the development of nuclear weapons.

This is the strongest language someone with the alleged clout of Rep. Eric Cantor could rustle up?

The lawmakers finally start in with the “must” word about halfway through the letter. Iran must be transparent, allow inspections, provide interviews, and answer questions already issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency, but long left unanswered.

Iran, of course, has been ignoring those requirements for years, even when the U.S. and other western nations girded the requirements with far more stringent language than is found in this letter. The idea that these demands might be met when the U.S. has already signaled its willingness to retreat when met with intransigence borders on an insult to constituents.

SENATE’S LETTER RELEASED BY AIPAC

Over on the Senate side, a somewhat stronger sounding letter is being circulated to colleagues by Charles Schumer (D-NY), , Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.). This letter was released to the public by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee on Sunday, March 2.

AIPAC desperately needed a show of strength, or at least activity, with respect to Iran. This is because its support for tougher sanctions against Iran shamefully petered out in the face of a strong pushback by the administration, with forceful assistance provided by certain members of congress who share the president’s political party.

But despite the rhetorical bravado, there is something very frightening about the way the letter ends.

Should negotiations fail or should Iran violate the Joint Plan of Action, Congress will need to ensure that the legislative authority exists to rapidly and dramatically expand sanctions. We need to work together now to prepare for either eventuality.

Most importantly, Iran must clearly understand the consequences of failing to reach an acceptable agreement. We must signal unequivocally to Iran that rejecting negotiations and continuing its nuclear weapon program will lead to much more dramatic sanctions, including further limitations on Iran’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products.

Do you see it? Now the greatest threat Iran faces is that the U.S. may impose strict sanctions. Before, the sanctions were in place in order to bring Iran to the bargaining table, and the ultimate threat was that “all options remained on the table, including the military one.”

Something has been pulled from the table. We’re marching backwards.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “Did Congress Intentionally Remove Iran Military Option?”

  1. I am with drawing and voting for bill gates for president of the world ok/

  2. Bill gates has a plan to Reduce the population. Does that tell you Anything?

  3. the world's greatest deliberative body can't think it's way out of a wet paper bag.

  4. Dede Irish says:

    depopulation is a the goal of our elite and overpopulation is a lie.

  5. H Fragman Abramson says:

    Perhaps that big US threat is why Russia/Putin won't be dissuaded from Empire building too…

  6. Well,,do we even have a military anymore,,go figure.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
FIFA president Sepp (Joseph) Blatter and PM Benjamin Netanayhu
Netanyahu Warns FIFA Palestinian Threats Will Destroy International Sport
Latest News Stories
FIFA president Sepp (Joseph) Blatter and PM Benjamin Netanayhu

PM Netanyahu warns FIFA that Palestinian blackmail will ultimately kill the international soccer federation which hopes to expel Israel from the group.

Site of the terror attack in Gush Etzion on May 14, 2015.

Another surgery is needed. Please daven for Aryeh ben Rina.

French Ambassador Gerard Araud, in his then capacity as permanent representative to the U.N., addresses the U.N. Security Council in May 2014.

Both Westmacott and German ambassador Peter Wittig warned that if the U.S. Congress blocked a deal by not enabling sanctions relief to take place, the international sanctions regime would collapse.

American dollars.

A cyber security breach into the IRS computer system has been traced back to Russia. Cost; $50 million-plus.

The temperature has been scorching hot for the past couple of days. And that’s been setting off brush fires. There have been massive fires, big fires and little fires all over the country. Some homes near Beit Shemesh were evacuated last night due to the approaching fires. As if it wasn’t hot enough outside.

The U.S. State Dept. had a difficult time explaining what the Quartet has ever accomplished except spending money.

Former New York Gov. George Pataki is the latest Republican to throw his hat in the crowed GOP ring of presidential hopefuls. He declared his candidacy in a video post Thursday morning and touted his actions as governor following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. “We need to recapture that spirit, that sense that we are one […]

A former of official of the same FIFA, which is considering expelling Israel, blamed “Zionism” for a bribe charge in 2011.

The South Carolina senator may run to be the Republican presidential nominee but has little chance of winning.

The request comes out to $4.1 billion a year starting from 2017, 10 percent more than the current military aid.

The firm’s Jewish co-founders handed out $1,500 worth of ice cream at Sander’s presidential campaign event in Vermont on Wednesday.

The Hareidi politicians agreed to not protest the country club after the mayor agreed to move it. So much for agreements.

Does the popularity of smoking grass mean that is good for the soul?

The US decides “no more extensions” as international nuclear talks with Iran come down to the wire.

Jewish Agency Chairman Natan Sharansky expresses his firm support for Efrat Chief Rabbi Shlomo Riskin.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister, inside the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, 1948

The Israeli Air Force responded to a rocket attack from Gaza by striking terrorist sites within the Strip.

The city of Palmyra in Syria was captured by ISIS on May 21, 2015.

This week ISIS captured two major cities, one in Iraq, one in Syria. Assad’s escape plan revealed.

Liberman apologizes for describing Netanyahu’s decision to meet with head of Arab Joint Party List as “autistic.”

Was the flub the result of the snub, or was Obama simply inadequately prepared for his meeting with the Saudi princes?

U.S. government documents reveal government knew within days terrorists were behind Benghazi attacks

Shaked: ‘ the judiciary, rather than the elected representatives of the people, wield the power to govern’

Yom Yerushalayim brought out lots of students, adults and supporters of Israel.

ISIS leader killed in raid by U.S. commandos, now ISIS ‘threatening to kill Obama and Christians.’

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/did-congress-intentionally-remove-military-option-from-the-table/2014/03/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: