web analytics
July 30, 2015 / 14 Av, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


House Bill to Slap Financial Penalties on anti-Israel Boycotts

The proposed legislation would prevent American taxpayers from having to subsidize the views of those seeking to marginalize and to penalize Israeli scholars and academic institutions
Cong. Peter Roskam (R-IL) introducing the Protect Academic Freedom Act on Tues., Feb. 4, 2014

Cong. Peter Roskam (R-IL) introducing the Protect Academic Freedom Act on Tues., Feb. 4, 2014
Photo Credit: Cong. Roskam screen capture

This week the “Protect Academic Freedom Act” was introduced into the U.S. Congress. If passed, the legislation will block universities from receiving federal funds if they engage in the boycott of Israeli academic institutions or scholars.

The Bipartisan Protect Academic Freedom Act (H.R. 4009) was introduced on Tuesday, Feb. 4, by Reps. Peter Roskum (R-IL) and Dan Lipinski (D-IL). The measure would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965.

The congressmen said the bill was introduced in order “to address the growing threat of unjustified boycotts against the Jewish State of Israel,” according to a statement they released on Thursday.

By introducing the proposed legislation, Roskam and Lipinski seek “to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to fund bigoted attacks against Israel that undermine the fundamental principles of academic freedom.”

The much-maligned boycott resolution passed by the American Studies Association in December, 2013, was specifically mentioned as an impetus for the bill. The ASA was the second academic association to pass boycott measures in 2013.  It is anticipated that many more academic associations may consider similar measures this year.

On the floor of the House, Roskam described the ASA boycott as a “shameful thing” which was “clearly an act of anti-Semitism” on the part of those voting in favor of the boycott.

Former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren is quoted in the statement released by the congressional co-sponsors announcing the proposed legislation.

“The Protect Academic Freedom Act represents the first legislation that defends Israel against discriminatory boycotts which impede rather than advance the peace process and that seek to deny Israelis the right to free speech on American campuses,” said former Ambassador Michael Oren.

“As a citizen of Israel and its former ambassador to the United States, as well as an historian and visiting professor on leading American campuses, I strongly support this courageous initiative. It can be the turning point in the struggle against the delegitimization of the Jewish State,” was Oren’s strong endorsement of the bill.

“This bipartisan legislation seeks to preserve academic freedom and combat bigotry by shielding Israel from unjust boycotts. It is ludicrous for critics to go after our democratic friend and ally Israel when they should be focusing on the evils perpetrated by repressive, authoritarian regimes like Iran and North Korea,” said Congressman Roskam, the Chief Deputy Whip and co-chair of the House Republican Israel Caucus.

Roskam explained that academics are protected by the First Amendment to have and to express their views against Israel, “but the American taxpayer doesn’t have to participate in it, the American taxpayer doesn’t have to be complicit in it, and the American taxpayer doesn’t have to take any part in it.”

“As a former university professor, I appreciate the value of academic exchanges involving universities and individuals, particularly between strong international allies with robust academic programs like the United States and Israel. Scholarship and research should be about the pursuit of knowledge, and universities have been and always should be a community where different opinions and ideas are encouraged and nourished,” said Congressman Dan Lipinski.

HOW THE BILL WOULD WORK IN PRACTICE

The language in the proposed bill states that any institution of higher education shall not be eligible for federal funds if the Secretary of Education “determines that such institution is participating in a boycott of  Israeli academic institutions or scholars.”

The way to determine whether a university is participating in a boycott – which is not necessarily obvious as, for example, the ASA is not a part of a specific university – is “if the institutions or any significant part of the institution, or any organization significantly funded by the institution adopts a policy or resolution, issues a statement, or otherwise formally establishes the restriction of discourse, cooperation, exchange, or any other involvement with academic institutions or scholars on the basis of the connection of such institutions or such scholars to the State of Israel.”

In other words, for example, with respect to the ASA boycott: first the secretary of education would determine whether there is an American Studies Department at a given university. If there is, and that AS department or the parent university has not withdrawn from the ASA, the university’s federal funding will be at risk. The same would be true for any other association that passes an academic boycott measure.

HARVARD STUDENTS PUBLICLY ASKED THEIR UNIVERSITY TO WITHDRAW FROM THE ASA

Harvard students Sara Greenberg and Yoav Schaefer applauded Harvard University President Drew Faust for condemning the ASA boycott in a letter written to Faust published in the Harvard Crimson earlier this month. The students urged Faust to go the next step, demonstrating “moral leadership and immediately withdraw Harvard’s institutional membership from the ASA.”  The students pointed out that other universities had done exactly that, in the wake of the ASA boycott. Brandeis Univesity, Penn State Harrisburg, Kenyon College and Indiana University have all already withdrawn from the ASA.

The Harvard students asked its university “to uphold its values and set an example for other universities around the country, showing that organizations promoting such boycotts will not only be denounced, but will also lose support from America’s leading academic institutions.”

Now Greenberg and Schaefer can add a financial basis to their moral basis for encouraging Harvard to withdraw from the tainted American Studies Association.

Last month, Congressman Roskam led a bipartisan letter signed by 134 Members of Congress, including Congressman Lipinski, to the American Studies Association (ASA) condemning its academic boycott of Israel.

Congressman Roskam announced this initiative on the House floor on Tuesday morning. Watch the video of his announcement, below. The bill will be referred to the House Committee on Education.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

8 Responses to “House Bill to Slap Financial Penalties on anti-Israel Boycotts”

  1. Romi Itzik says:

    nicht neu Nothing New

  2. Dan Silagi says:

    This is a stupid law, and is blatantly unconstitutional. If the BDSholes are proscribed from boycotting Israel, then it would only be fair to extend the law so that, for instance, American educational institutions can't boycott Italy for what the Italians are trying to do to Amanda Knox. This law would have to be extended to all academic boycotts because a law only forbidding boycotts of Israel would be a bill of attainder (a law affecting only one person or group of people). Even then, it would be a violation of the First Amendment.

  3. Jane Smith says:

    American universities aren't boycotting Italy over the possible extradition of Amanda Knox, so your analogy is ludicrous. The majority of US taxpayers do NOT want to participate in the persecution of the State of Israel or the Jews, and they should not be forced, through taxation, to do so.

  4. Terry Beals says:

    I am for the bill. However, I would say that if they want freedom to "boycott" or anything else, they should not be receiving government funds. Then again, can the government be totally without bias when in comes to spending our tax dollars? Government needs to get TOTALLY OUT of the subsidizing business and let business and institutions operate on their own, the way our nation worked a grew for 200 years. They need to go back to the constitution and do their responsibility stated there and get back to our sure foundations.

  5. How is it unconstitutional? It puts no restrictions on individual rights to say what they want or to boycott who they want. It does not restrict the rights to assemble. It does not promote or discourage any religion. It just prevents government money from being used to prevent others from practicing their rights to practice free speech and to assemble. Really, this bill does more to enhance the first amendment by preventing entities that take government money from promoting their own ideals at the expense of others. Your boycotts are both unconstitutional and anti-intellectual, and anybody supporting them has no interest in furthering the collective knowledge of mankind. Government grants should only go towards expanding our understanding of the universe around us, not as tools of pseudo-intellectuals to destroy part of that universe and understanding. If you still want to boycott Israel, start or join your own movement without government money or join the neo-nazis… this bill doesn't restrict your freedoms to do either.

  6. Lynn Bianca Baronti says:

    So glad something is being done about this.

  7. Maynard Miller says:

    I'll keep my fingers crossed that the bill will pass. Who ever came up with the idea to boycott Israel, our friend? Why not boycott our enemies i.e. North Korea and Iran? We are over run by dummies in this country.

  8. Lani Lowell says:

    Stopping The libel and slander against the State of Israel is hardly preferential treatment. This bill is preventing the unfair singling out of Israel by special interests groups who have no interest in acknowledging or presenting facts , simply because they want to block the development of Jews.When does free speech turn into attack, libel and slander with untruths? I think this bill is a great advancement exactly because it addresses that issue. When Jewish students feel intimidated on campuses across the country! it is simply time to address the anti semitic elephant in the living room.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Dore Gold.
Foreign Ministry Calls Sunni Arab Nations ‘Israel’s Allies’
Latest News Stories
Dore Gold.

Dore Gold pointed out to American Jewish Leaders that Israel and Sunni Muslims agree on Iran.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan  with U.S. President Barack Obama

Turkey paradoxically accuses the outlawed Kurdish PKK terror group of collaborating with ISIS.

Hebron.

Israeli military medics rescued a Palestinian Authority Arab girl in Hebron on Thursday.

Israelis visit the former northern Samaria town of Sa-Nur.

At least 2 Border Guard officers refused early Thursday to expel families from the ruins of Sa-Nur.

A Jewish bride has been arrested at the Temple Mount on her wedding day.

Hamas in Gaza is calling for an “uprising” against the Palestinian Authority security force.

This will allow the ministers to quit their Knesset positions and concentrate exclusively on their ministerial jobs.

Kerry justifies keeping Iran deal “side deals” from the American public, while skipping Israel on ME trip.

The exhibition “A blessing to one another: Pope John Paul II and the Jewish People,” opened on Tuesday in the Vatican.

Rio De Janeiro’s Jewish community will open two synagogues to accommodate Jewish visitors at the 2016 Olympics.

Israel said the report is “fundamentally flawed in its methodologies, in its facts, in its legal analysis and in its conclusions,” and one-sided, bringing “into serious question Amnesty’s professional standards.”

“I think what Mike has done has hit a nerve and he’s made people think a little bit.”

The Prime Minister approved construction of the homes after the High Court ordered demolitions of homes under construction.

The White House said Pollard’s serious crimes’ preclude his being allowed to travel abroad.

“Those who were highly connected to Israel were more likely to perceive their campus environment as hostile toward Jews and Israel and to report being blamed for Israel’s action.”

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. July 29, 2015.

Kerry justifies keeping Iran deal “side deals” from the American public, while skipping Israel on ME trip.

US Secy of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif shake hands.

A poll suggesting American Jews support the Iran deal is flawed, while a new poll reveals the opposite.

Netanyahu called Pollard’s wife over news of his impending release from prison.

12,000 people filled Times Square at the Stop Iran Now rally in NY’s Times Square.

The NYC rally against the Iran deal must show Congress, which must show the world, that Americans don’t support this deal.

Read “Catch the Jew” to learn the truth about Israel, Israelis, Arab Palestinians and the havoc-wreaking NGOs in the region.

Kuwaiti-American 24 year old murdered four US marines in a drive-by shooting on Thursday.

AIPAC, Take 2: Tell Congress to stop this Iran agreement.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/house-bill-to-slap-financial-penalties-on-anti-israel-boycotts/2014/02/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: