web analytics
March 29, 2015 / 9 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


IRS: We Targeted Supporters of Israel’s Disputed Territories

On Monday the IRS provided the 'smoking gun' pointed at its own head, in reports and information showing that the government agency made decisions based upon the views of pro-Israel groups which disagreed with the administration about the 'Disputed Territories.'
IRS documents revealed the Service had been targeting pro-Israel groups whose view on the territories differed from the administration's.

IRS documents revealed the Service had been targeting pro-Israel groups whose view on the territories differed from the administration's.

Ever since the beginning of the scandal concerning the United States Internal Revenue Service and the claims that it had a policy of treating differently – as in worse – organizations seeking tax exemptions if those organizations held positions in conflict with this US administration, there have been doubters.

And, of course, the way the story has been spun fans the flames of doubt – yes, the IRS finally admitted, after years of denial, that it had targeted certain groups and subject some groups to extra scrutiny, but there was no political impetus for the inappropriate action, there was just poor oversight of overworked civil service employees who were just trying to streamline their jobs.  Heck, the claim went, that was wrong, but what we now recognize as inappropriate actions weren’t taken for political purposes. That was the claim.

The IRS is trying desperately to make glib admissions, have some heads roll, even parade some of those heads around to show how seriously the IRS takes its need to be punished.  But now, it’s time to move on.  The IRS is even providing a kind of amnesty for many of the politically conservative groups that complained – they are getting hand-delivered approval letters, and future applicants will be assured of an easier time going forward.

So, maybe it is time to move on?

Well, one little organization (the one this reporter founded and of which she is the president) refuses to go flying no matter how hard the IRS is shaking its leg to free itself.

Z STREET claimed when it filed its lawsuit for viewpoint discrimination against the IRS in August, 2010, that the IRS treated Z STREET differently subjecting it to additional scrutiny, because of its ideological views.

Two things happened on Monday, June 24, that proved, finally, that Z STREET – and others similarly situated – was correct.

First, the IRS released its 83 page document, “Charting a Path Forward at the IRS,” in response to the Treasury Department’s Inspector General who found that the IRS had engaged in inappropriate targeting of certain groups which had sought tax exempt status from the IRS.

The IRS Path Report begins:

The IRS used inappropriate criteria that identified for review Tea Party and other organizations applying for tax-exempt status based upon their names or policy positions instead of indications of potential political campaign intervention.

Well, there you have it.  The IRS admitted that it made decisions based on policy positions, rather than on prohibited activity.  That is exactly what Z STREET claimed – that it had been discriminated against because it holds positions that “contradict the Administration’s public policies.”

The second revelation was one made by Bloomberg News.  That media agency obtained IRS documents revealing that, in addition to the terms Tea Party and 9/12, other terms were used in flagging organizations seeking tax exempt status for additional scrutiny.  While the headline of the article, and what was the object of most media attention, was that terms that suggested not just conservative groups, but also liberal or progressive groups were given the IRS evil eye – words such as “occupy” and “progressive” were allegedly triggers, as was the word “Israel.”

But far down in a long article the Bloomberg reporter explains that, “Disputed Territories” was considered problematic.  To wit:

‘Disputed Territories”

The November, 2010 [BOLO – Be On the Look Out] list also has terms that could be related to Israel, looking for applications that ‘deal with disputed territories in the Middle East’ and ‘may be inflammatory.’

Well, golly!  What kind of a group calls a particular area of land “disputed territories,” which the vast majority of people, either for ideological or simply conformity refer to as the “West Bank?”  Yes, that would be strong Zionist groups such as Z STREET.

That the IRS chose to handle Z STREET’s application in a particular way on the basis of our organization’s position on this issue, and the fact that someone within the IRS even took the time to think such a position might ‘be inflammatory,’ is about as close as can be to a smoking gun revealing the IRS engaged in naked viewpoint discrimination.

That foul activity cannot be waved away.  Its stench is one that will only dissipate after there is a thorough investigation into how the  decision was made to use this particular criterion for evaluating an application.  Who approved that decision?  How many people knew about it?  How many organizations were subjected to it?

And now there are other delicate issues which demand attention.  If this was the basis for a decision, why were three IRS agents allowed – or were they forced? – to suggest under oath that there was another basis for delaying Z STREET’s application? First there was the claim that perhaps Z STREET was really an “action” organization whose mission could only be accomplished by legislation.  Then there was the claim that Israel is a country where there is a “heightened risk of terrorism,” and of course Z STREET required special scrutiny because it might be providing funds to terrorist groups.  Except, of course, Z STREET doesn’t fund anything, and then there is the little matter of Israel being the object of terrorism, not the source of terrorism.

And, further, on the subject of Israel and terrorism – how is it that the IRS felt comfortable making the argument, presenting as a legitimate basis for giving special scrutiny to pro-Israel organizations the likely possibility that it meant those groups might engage in supporting terrorism, is an additional cause for alarm.  Where was the so-called “Israel lobby” and why weren’t its members screaming at the top of their lungs that such an explanation was being offered?

The IRS scandal certainly isn’t over.  But with respect to the portion that has to do with the Service’s treatment of pro-Israel organizations, it looks like the IRS no longer has much basis for denying it engaged in viewpoint discrimination.  Now the question becomes how to make sure the prior wrong behavior is ferreted out, the wrongdoers are punished, and mechanisms are put in place that ensure such wrongdoing does not continue.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “IRS: We Targeted Supporters of Israel’s Disputed Territories”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Please let us know when we can finally donate to Z street.

  2. Paul McGowan says:

    We need to rid our self of the irs and institute the FAIR TAX!

  3. Cody Flecker says:

    We need a Fair Flat tax that everyone should pay. No deductions or exemptions. Do away with political shananigans, and hocus pocus. Most of all do away with the entire Obama Administration and provide psychiatric treatment for all those 70%+ Jews who voted for a known anti semite, and most probably will vote for another one in 2016.

  4. Cody Flecker says:

    We need a Fair Flat tax that everyone should pay. No deductions or exemptions. Do away with political shananigans, and hocus pocus. Most of all do away with the entire Obama Administration and provide psychiatric treatment for all those 70%+ Jews who voted for a known anti semite, and most probably will vote for another one in 2016.

  5. it all came from the very top corrupt Gov.

  6. What we "need" to do is get rid of the Federal Reserve and it's fiat money system.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
obamatargetiran-275x167
Iranian Journalist Defects, Says US Team Speaking for Iran
Latest News Stories
obamatargetiran-275x167

“The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with
other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal.”

Aftermath of Saudi air strike on Yemen.

Saudi Arabia withdraws personnel from Aden. Iran calls Saudi strike a “strategic mistake.”

“The tone of #US officials’ background comments on #Iran talks is getting progressively more dreary, like the weather in #Lausanne,” Associate Press reporter Matt Lee tweeted Saturday night. Lee is a veteran journalist who has a keen eye and ear that cuts through the double talk and dishonest smiling faces of American diplomats. If he […]

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

It is a long tradition in the Muslim world never to agree to anything at an agreed time.

Hamas test fired a rocket on Saturday, the rocket landed within the Gaza Strip.

Israel was aware of the report’s impending release and did not object.

The PA hasn’t changed anything on their end, so why did Netanyahu suddenly change his policy?

Obama’s “two-state” phobia shows how much he and his experts do not understand the Middle East.

Kosher for Passover? Depends who you ask.

The main suspect confessed to passing on information to Syria through the Internet.

Has anyone asked Obama why Netanyahu should even think about agreeing to a Palestinian Authority country?

A U.S. Air Force F-15 warplane dropped approximately 60,000 leaflets over the Syrian city of Raqaa to discourage people from joining the Islamic State (ISIS), the Pentagon revealed Thursday. The “Military Information Support Operations,” propaganda campaign was carried out last week and was the first time the United States has used the tactic in Syria. […]

Israel reportedly wants to change the names to Hebrew, which would affront Muslim sensitivities.

The non-binding vote approves funds for imposing sanctions if Iran violates a deal.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow is in an underground bunker.

Congress is ‘fed up’ with being left in the dark on the Iran negotiations

Saudi Arabia has begun airstrikes on neighboring Yemen, which has been overtaken by Iranian-backed rebels.

Saudi Arabia began airstrikes on neighboring Yemen which has been taken over by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.

Obama says Bibi has to prove he supports a “two-state solution.”

Obama’s Chief of Staff chides Netanyahu at the J Street Conference for refusing to embrace fantasy as reality.

A Cruz presidency as antidote to Obama: repeal Obamacare, dismantle the IRS, strong support for Israel.

The anti-Bibi campaign’s quiet change in tax status both came too late and constitutes an admission of wrongdoing.

V15 is barred from attempting to achieve its stated goals: defeat Bibi and create a Palestinian State.

US Embassy and consulates in Saudi Arabia closed due to ‘heightened security concerns.’

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/irs-we-targeted-supporters-of-israels-disputed-territories/2013/06/25/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: