Haaretz ‘Apartheid’ Survey is False and Biased, Charges Israeli Media Watch Dog ‘Presspectiva’
Latest update: October 31st, 2012
print
tell a friend
A recent survey conducted and presented by Haaretz newspaper claimed that the majority of Jews in Israel advocates the instating of an apartheid regime, and further claimed that most Israel is believe that currently there are areas in which apartheid measures are already exercised.
The survey relied on a sample of 503 respondents, and was published in the media all over the world, allegedly revealing a series of racist views and extreme nationalist opinions among the Jewish citizens of Israel. An in-depth analysis of the survey performed by the Israeli media watch dog ‘Presspectiva’ presents a different depiction of Israeli opinion. Presspectiva was able to obtain a full copy of the survey, enabling them to take a close and accurate look at the survey’s findings.
According to their analysis, the conclusions in this survey were misrepresented by the Haaretz article, details were omitted, and Gideon Levy’s coverage of the survey was not objective and contained information that was intentionally distorted.
Presspectiva’s study provides many examples of inconsistencies between the survey’s data and the information presented by Haaretz newspaper. The first example is the question in which respondents were asked for their opinion regarding the roads permissible for Israeli use only. Parenthetically, it should be noted that these roads exist as a result of security necessities. Respondents were asked whether they think the existence of such roads is good or bad, and is there a way to stop such instances. 24% of the respondents viewed this situation as positive, while 50% said it is bad, but there’s nothing to do about it, and 17% claimed that the phenomenon must be stopped. Despite these clear details, the reporter chose to publish that 74% of respondents support the existence of such authorized roads for Israelis only – in stark contrast to the respondents’ answers.
Furthermore, respondents were asked several questions about racism and a possible preference of the Jewish sector over the Arab one. In this sequence of questions most respondents gave answers which expressed their desire to integrate the Arab sector into general society, and their support of equal rights to all. For example, 49% of the respondents stated that they would not be bothered by an Arab student in their children’s class. In addition, 60% of respondents (compared to 33%) claimed that Israeli Arabs should be allowed to vote for the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament), in contrast to what Gideon Levy wrote in his article.
Throughout the article, it seems, the text highlights negative data, ignoring the details which depict a different picture.
On the subject of apartheid, which was used as the article’s title, there were also some distortions, according to Presspectiva’s research. In the question regarding apartheid, respondents were asked about a scenario in which Israel would annex Judea and Samaria, a situation which could lead to two and a half million Palestinians voting for the Knesset. 69% of respondents said they would oppose such a reality. However, Levy decided to conclude from their reply that the respondents support the existence of apartheid in Israel, a very broad interpretation of this data.
It should be noted that in the article itself, the reporter points out that it seems that the respondents did not fully understand the term ‘apartheid’, however, it did not prevent the reporter from remarking on the respondents’ opinion on the subject, despite their lack of understanding. According to Presspectiva, it seems that the answers given by the respondents were based on the understanding of the term ‘apartheid’ as synonymous with ‘discrimination’. Another element that contributed to the confusion was the surveyors’ question whether there is “some” apartheid in Israel, or is the phenomenon prevalent. Apartheid policy is a political phenomenon and cannot be quantified.
Presspectiva published its reaction to the Haaretz article because its suspicion of the facts presented in the Haaretz article, allegedly showing extreme racism among the Israeli Jewish population. In-Depth examination of the facts presented by the survey shows that the reality is different. The results do not reflect a racially motivated society in Israel that supports apartheid, as it was presented in Haaretz newspaper.
After being attacked by several sources, Haaretz published a clarification stating that their headline and article were misleading. Gideon Levy published an apology as well. However, the article has already been published by the British Guardian, the British Independent, the Canadian Globe and Mail and tens of other sites, causing extensive damage to the image of Israel and its citizens.
tell a friendAbout the Author: Tom Nisani is a contributor to Tazpit News Agency.
You might also be interested in:
You must log in to post a comment.
No Responses to “Haaretz ‘Apartheid’ Survey is False and Biased, Charges Israeli Media Watch Dog ‘Presspectiva’”
1
Loading ...
absolutely disgusting! it may well be that some people wouldn't give credence to such a report – after all, there are 'lies, damend lies and statistics'. But headlines like that stick in people's minds and become truth to them. When one of our own chooses to publish such a skewed view of our reality to the world at large, it's frankly unforgivable! When defamation like this is published in an international forum there's no way to correct the damage that has been done, short of hunting down each person who has read it and sitting down with them to explain the actual truth. Gideon Levy's apology is frankly worthless.
Well put Judy, words fail me when I see such slanderous rants.
Any time the gaza based nazi owned haaretz publishes any article about Jews and Israel, one must dig deeper. Any one reviewing the paper will see clearly that 90% of their articles are designed to attack the State and Jews. Gideon Levy would have been knighted by goebbles. And schocken, the publisher, once penned an editorial that stated the "cure for world peace" would be if all Jews inter-married thereby eradicating Judaism. The Israeli public has finally woken up and reacting to the schocken/levy Jew hatred by refusing to purchase the paper or pay for on line content a result of which is that haaretz is now heading to bankruptcy having laid off a large chunk of their staff.
I understand shocken has already sent a resume to hezbollah and hamas looking to be hired as their press spokesperson and that levy is looking forward to balancing his future "career" between ma'an and al jazeera.
Any time the gaza based nazi owned haaretz publishes any article about Jews and Israel, one must dig deeper. Any one reviewing the paper will see clearly that 90% of their articles are designed to attack the State and Jews. Gideon Levy would have been knighted by goebbles. And schocken, the publisher, once penned an editorial that stated the “cure for world peace” would be if all Jews inter-married thereby eradicating Judaism. The Israeli public has finally woken up and reacting to the schocken/levy Jew hatred by refusing to purchase the paper or pay for on line content a result of which is that haaretz is now heading to bankruptcy having laid off a large chunk of their staff.
I understand shocken has already sent a resume to hezbollah and hamas looking to be hired as their press spokesperson and that levy is looking forward to balancing his future “career” between ma’an and al jazeera.