Photo Credit: Jewish Press

World Jewish Congress president Ronald Lauder continued his unfortunate recent trend of criticizing the State of Israel’s policies in The New York Times this week.

When he warned in a March op-ed in The Times that settlements endangered the two-state solution, and in his view, Israel’s future, he wrote that he was speaking out as “a friend expressing an inconvenient truth.”

Advertisement

This time, he wrote in the same newspaper “as a loving brother.”

A true friend or brother would speak directly, as Lauder can, due to his closeness to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders, and then leave it up to them to make their choices about Israel’s future, as their voters elected them to do.

Unfortunately, but that is not what Lauder chose to do. Why is it friendly or brotherly to malign Israel on the pages of a newspaper with a long track record of criticizing Israel not only in its editorials but also in news fit and unfit to print?

This was out of character for Ambassador Lauder, who has defended Israel in countries around the world for decades as the leader of the World Jewish Congress, Jewish National Fund, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. There is no gainsaying that Israel owes Lauder a debt of gratitude for all he has done for the Jewish state.

One reason for his criticism, Lauder wrote, is the much-maligned Jewish Nation-State Law. But in the same newspaper, former Jerusalem Post editor-in-chief Bret Stephens pointed out that the bill’s “most controversial provisions were stripped from it before passage” and that it is not “remotely as noxious as what is happening in other Western democracies wrestling with competing claims between national identity, civil liberties and cultural pluralism.” He brought to attention worse legislation in Denmark and said the international community should reserve its outrage for Syria torturing hundreds of people to death.

Falling into the trap of opposition politicians in Israel and international media with an anti-Israel agenda, Lauder accuses the Knesset majority that passed the bill of “tarnishing equality,” because that key word is not in the new law. It is also not in any of the other Basic Laws passed by Israel, including Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom, where it belongs more than in a law about Israel being a Jewish state.

Does Lauder believe that the administration of the late Yitzhak Rabin, which amended Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom without adding the magic word also tarnished Israel’s equality?

However, the main target in Lauder’s piece was “the Orthodox,” who he paints with one brush, as if there are not huge differences within Israel’s vibrant modern Orthodox, nationalist religious Zionist and charedi communities.

Lauder refers to Orthodoxy as “a radical minority” and suggests that it alienates millions of Jews worldwide.”

In truth, Orthodox Judaism is the fastest growing branch of our faith in the United States. While Reform synagogues are closing, and the Conservative Movement is struggling to attract young people, Orthodox synagogues are full and expanding.

Perhaps Lauder should use his pulpit in America’s top read newspapers to fight against assimilation and intermarriage and ensure that America’s other movements are as successful in invigorating their people as the Orthodox.

Far from “crushing the core of contemporary Jewish existence,” when members of Israel’s government encourage Orthodox traditions, they are carrying out policies supported by their people. Our Orthodox traditions have kept the Jewish people going for 3000 years.

Orthodox politicians in Israel have expressed support for compromises, including Naftali Bennett, who heads the Orthodox Bayit Yehudi party and boasts that he built an egalitarian prayer site at the Western Wall, and Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the late spiritual mentor of the Sephardi haredi Shas party, who endorsed and enabled the passage of the Oslo Accords that Lauder championed.

Lauder warned that if Israel continues its policies, future leaders of the West will become hostile or indifferent to the Jewish state. Such threats ring hollow, considering that after two decades of Israel being told it would be shunned if there is no diplomatic process with the Palestinians, Netanyahu is being warmly welcomed on six continents.

What Lauder gets right in his piece is his call for unity. Clearly, Israel needs solidarity as it enters its eighth decade of existence.

I agree that we must “stop sowing division among ourselves.” I hope that in his next submission to The New York Times, Lauder will do just that.

Advertisement

Loading Facebook Comments ...