web analytics
October 2, 2014 / 8 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



BIG LIE EXPOSED

Letter Reveals Rav Ovadia Retracted ‘Land for Peace’ Ruling in 2003

Another Big Lie is exposed. Rav Ovadia favored giving up land for peace in 1993. But when the PA blew up the Oslo Accords 10 years later, the rabbi ruled, “Oslo is null and void. This is not the peace I meant.”

Israeli bus after suicide bombing

Israeli bus after suicide bombing
Photo Credit: Flash90

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef reversed his famous “Land for Peace” ruling of 1993 after the Palestinian Authority literally exploded in Israel’s face a decade later with large-scale terrorist attacks, including suicide bombings.

The revelation of the letter, seen below, explains Rav Ovadia’s incredibly strong statements in recent sermons, such as one of the most famous ones three years ago when he said of the Palestinian Authority, “All these evil people should perish from this world. God should strike them with a plague, them and these Palestinians.”

In 1993, when the prospect of peace turned into a mantra that mass media used to blind themselves and wishful-thinkers, the idea of Israel’s surrendering Judea, Gaza and Samaria for peace with Yasser Arafat was pushed by U.S. President Bill Clinton.

The Israeli government was split, and the Shas party, which obeyed whatever Rav Ovadia said, withstood arguments from nationalists and kept the Rabin-Peres coalition government alive with his famous ruling in favor of giving up “land for peace” because it is a matter of “pikuach nefesh,” saving the lives of Jews.

After Rav Ovadia died, Israel’s populist but rather ignorant media turned the funeral into a peace festival that obliterated the greatness of the rabbi, who wrote 50 books and who was cited all over the world as one of the greatest Torah sages ever.

The “expert analysts” on Israel radio and in the mass media explained that Rav Ovadia was a great man, but not because of  his brilliant mind that lived and breathed Torah and not because of the Shas party that he founded and turned into a kingmaker in Israeli politics.

“Land for peace” was the reason 800,000 Jews from all sects of Israeli society came to the funeral.

What they did not say is that 10 years after Oslo, during the Second Intifada that also is known as the Oslo War, Rav Ovadia ruled exactly the opposite.

Instead of “land for peace” being an issue to save the lives of Jews, it had become clear that it was a concept that endangered Jews.

Arafat’s “peace,” which murdered more than 1,000 Jews, wounded thousands others and which continues until today under the invisible hand of Mahmoud Abbas, is not the peace Rav Ovadia had in mind.

He wrote, “My dear brothers of Israel, residents of Judea and Samaria:

“It is my intention to make clear my position concerning Judea and Samaria. I have explained more than once since my Halachic ruling, that giving up land for peace has no validity in light of the current situation.

“I intended there be a true peace, in which Jerusalem and its surroundings will be secure in peace and quiet. But now, our eyes see that surrendering our holy land causes a danger to life.

“This is not the peace for which we prayed. Therefore, the Oslo Accords are null and void.”

Rav Ovadia then cited the verse form Psalms that states, “I speak peace and they speak war.”

Just as populist media falsified Rav Ovadia’s ruling, it has turned Jews in Israel and all over the world into victims of ignorant and slanderous reporting of Rav Ovadia’s Saturday night sermons. They took phrases out of contact and without any understanding that the rabbis was speaking the language his constituents understood, which is not the style of the pseudo-sophisticated Ashkenazi elite and certainly not that of the bleeding-heart media.

The Aish HaTorah website once quoted Rav Ovadia with comments that stated much clearer his idea of land for peace.

It quoted Rav Ovadia as saying, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated: “If the heads and commanders of the army, together with the government, state that saving of life is involved; that if areas of Israel are not given back, the danger exists of immediate war on the part of our Arab neighbors;

“And if the areas are returned to them, the danger of war will be averted; and that there is a chance of permanent peace; then it seems that according to all opinions it is permitted to return areas of Israel in order to achieve this aim, since nothing is more important than the saving of life.”

The Palestinian Authority war or terror on Israeli in the 1990s, after the Oslo Accords did not satisfy Arafat’s appetite to swallow up Israel, took a breather towards the end of the decade when the Barak government was on the verge of giving Arafat almost everything he wanted.

However, 97 percent of the land of Judea, Gaza and Samaria was not enough for the Palestinian Authority, and he launched the Oslo War that clearly made Rav Ovadia’s ruling irrelevant to the new reality of “land for terror.”

Rav Ovadia's letter in 2003 in which he reversed his "land for peace" ruling and said that is is forbidden because it endangers Jews..

Rav Ovadia’s letter in 2003 in which he reversed his “land for peace” ruling and said that is is forbidden because it endangers Jews..

About the Author: Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu is a graduate in journalism and economics from The George Washington University. He has worked as a cub reporter in rural Virginia and as senior copy editor for major Canadian metropolitan dailies. Tzvi wrote for Arutz Sheva for several years before joining the Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

13 Responses to “Letter Reveals Rav Ovadia Retracted ‘Land for Peace’ Ruling in 2003”

  1. Daas Torah says:

    Rabbi Ovadia wrote in his book, “Yabia Omer,” that saving lives is more important than territorial claims.

    http://1daastorah.blogspot.com/2013/10/bdh-rabbi-ovadia-yosef-ztl.html#more

  2. Daas Torah says:

    Rabbi Ovadia wrote in his book, “Yabia Omer,” that saving lives is more important than territorial claims.

    http://1daastorah.blogspot.com/2013/10/bdh-rabbi-ovadia-yosef-ztl.html#more

  3. Vogelgesang Sylvie says:

    this is important information for the temporal , vital information for eternity is found in Daniel 9 , it is there one find the precise timing of the coming of Messiah ?

  4. it is not only the left wing who are angry about rav ovadia and oslo. also all the victims of oslo and do not tell me a rabbi who knows torah, does not know the verses that say you cannot make peace with the wicked. no he was wrong and people died. why should we rejoice because he said whoops mistake years later. the dead are still dead.

  5. This article is misleading. Rav Ovadia z"l ruled that, theoretically, it would be permissible to give up land to achieve peace if the military and political leadership truly believed that a peace agreement would enhance the security of the state and save lives in both the immediate and long term. He did not rule that the government must at that time sign the Oslo accords. His later statements indicate that he did not believe that the P.A. could be trusted and that he believed that the P.A. were enemies of the Jewish People and needed to be fought as an enemy. That does not contradict his original ruling that, in theory, land can be given up for peace. His original ruling was to counter a prevailing opinion in the National Religious camp that it is sinful to give up land under any circumstances and that it was ontologically impossible to achieve piece by giving up land. I believe that this article is both incorrect and irresponsible. It is not, in fact, "eye opening" at all.

  6. Yechiel Baum says:

    The land of Israel was NOT Rav Ovadya's to give up to begin with.
    Did he stand higher than Hashem who decreed that all of the land of Israel belongs to the Jews and to no one else.

  7. Rav Ovadia z"l did not believe ch"v that he "stood higher than G-d." He believed that the halakha in our times does not prohibit forfeiting land for the sake of piece and he believed that this was what the Torah actually sanctioned. The fact that the prophets promise that ultimately there will be a return of the shvatim and the land will all be in our control does not, in the opinion of Rav Ovadia, mean that we are prohibited from surrendering land if we believe that a peace agreement will increase the security of the state. Later, Rav Ovadia expressed the opinion that peace with the Palestinians was not presently possible, but that does not mean he retracted his halakhic ruling. His halakhic ruling was not applicable to a situation where we believe that a territorial compromise would decrease security and lead to greater loss of life. His ruling applied only to situations where one believes that a territorial compromise would lead to increased security and would save lives. Whether a peace plan will work is a political question and not a halakhic question. Whether, in theory, one can give up land in certain scenarios is a halakhic question. One needs to separate halakhic rulings form political opinions. I believe if you would read his teshuva on this you would not ask such questions. Again this news article is entirely misleading and you appear to be among those misled by it.

  8. What a load of crap this article is. We judge a man by his actions not his words, and Ovadia Kesef was ready to support Oslo up to the day he died. In fact, he was ready to support the "Peace" process even after the most recent elections a couple of months ago, in return for Sha$ being in the government. In the end, Sha$ didn't make it into the government, not because of anything having to do with the "Peace" process, but because Yair Lapid of the Yesh Atid party declared that he would not sit in the same government as any Haredi party, so Bibi chose Lapid over the Haredi parties. This is the same reason that Degel HaTorah is not in the government this time either.

  9. What a load of crap this article is. We judge a man by his actions, not his words, and Ovadia Kesef was ready to support Oslo up to the day he died. In fact, he was ready to support the "Peace" process even after the most recent elections a couple of months ago, in return for Sha$ being in the government. In the end, Sha$ didn't make it into the government, not because of anything having to do with the "Peace" process, but because Yair Lapid of the Yesh Atid party declared that he would not sit in the same government as any Haredi party, so Bibi chose Lapid over the Haredi parties. This is the same reason that Degel HaTorah is not in the government this time either.

  10. Zvi Zimri says:

    Christians, [lease go away. This has no relation to your supposed messiah, the J-idol on the stick.

  11. Zvi Zimri says:

    Christians, please go away. This has no relation to your supposed messiah, the J-idol on the stick.

  12. I have always been against the concept of land for peace. One of the reasons is Israel is a tiny country who has already given up land that was rightfully theirs religiously, politically, and morally. The other reason is, it simply does not work. Land for peace has never achieved peace, all it does is embolden the enemy to become even more violent and less rational. Land for peace is a form of appeasement and as history has shown on multiple occasions, appeasement fails miserably. This is the reason why I am also against other forms of appeasement like releasing Palestinian terrorists from prison, what did it achieve in the latest round of “peace talks.” Is Israel any closer to peace with the Palestinians now than they were before they released the terrorists from prison? Have the Palestinians reciprocated by making any concessions of their own? If anything, things have gotten worse because of increased violence against innocent Israelis. The same holds true with settlement freezes. It has become a popular cliché for the international community to claim that settlements are the obstacle to peace. If this is the case, why has there been no peace when Israel stopped settlement building in the past? The obstacle to peace has been the unwillingness of the Arabs to live as responsible, normal neighbors with Israel and no amount of appeasement will change this fact.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Tapuach Junction. (archive)
Border Police Stop Terrorists at Tapuach Junction
Latest News Stories
Tapuach Junction. (archive)

Border Police blocked two terrorists from Samaria from infiltrating and carrying out a terror attack in pre-1967 Israel on Thursday.

State Dept. Spokesperson Jen Psaki at Daily Briefing on June 2, 2014.

The OU criticized White House and State Dept. Spokespeople for suggesting Jews buying houses in Jerusalem is ‘provocative.’

Car Smashed in A-Tur 2

A woman and three girls miraculously escaped an Arab lynch mob on Thursday afternoon while driving through the Jerusalem A-Tur neighborhood on the Mount of Olives.

Israeli PM Netanyahu and US Pres. Obama met in the Oval Office on Oct. 1, 2014.

The subtext in an Obama and Netanyahu press conference continues to be a disagreement over the role of Iran.

“How then, can anyone say that, the practice of Islam is protected by the U.S. Constitution?”

Why doesn’t Obama also label Jerusalem Arabs as “illegitimate settlers?”

Israel’s President Ruby Rivlin recites Slichot, the prayers for forgiveness that are said leading up to Yom Kippur. This slichot prayer session was held at the President’s official residence. Speaking of presidential pardons, it would be good if this were the year that Jonathan Pollard was let free.

American university campuses have become fertile ground for seeds of evil.

Letter of protest charges SJP with “harassing and intimidating Jewish students.”

Biden’s new national security adviser dissed Israel in the Democratic party platform and mocks Iran’s danger.

PA leader Abbas demands UN force Israel back to 1949 Armistice Line by Nov. 2016.

Car fires are car fires,” said the Atlantic City fire chief. But the car was parked!

US admits its ‘no-strike if any civilians might be hit’ policy does not apply to its airstrikes against ISIS.

Israeli police revealed on September 30 that they are now investigating the possibility that a fellow Arab worker may have cut the cable that held Arami as he was doing exterior work on a building.

A 14-year-old Dutch Muslim high school student is suspended after posting a video saying he is “from ISIS” and wants to “behead Jews.”

More Articles from Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu
Jan Morgan, owner of the Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range.

“How then, can anyone say that, the practice of Islam is protected by the U.S. Constitution?”

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat puts cement on the official cornerstone celebrating the reopening of the Tiferet Israel Synagogue in Jerusalem's Old City.

Why doesn’t Obama also label Jerusalem Arabs as “illegitimate settlers?”

Car fires are car fires,” said the Atlantic City fire chief. But the car was parked!

Israel talks with building blocks. The Palestinian Authority throws them.

The Palestinian Authority continues to remove its mask and show it is Hamas in sheep’s clothing.

Netanyahu had a lot to say to Ban, but there is no indication if anyone listened.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/letter-reveals-rav-ovadia-reversed-land-for-peace-ruling-in-2003/2013/10/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: