web analytics
January 25, 2015 / 5 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


NYT Gets US Position on Israel Wrong, Reveals Additional Animus

Two New York Times journalists get their facts wrong about Israel, and Wall Street Journal reporter prefers inaccuracies to corrections
NYT Jerusalem correspondent Jodi Rudoren wrote that the US believes the "settlements" are illegal. That has never been the US position.  The NYT had to issue a correction.

NYT Jerusalem correspondent Jodi Rudoren wrote that the US believes the "settlements" are illegal. That has never been the US position. The NYT had to issue a correction.
Photo Credit: Lori Lowenthal Marcus

The New York Times recognized that its correspondent in Jerusalem, Jodi Rudoren, had gone too far this time in blithely vilifying Jews who live and breathe beyond the so-called Green Line.

Rudoren ascribed a position to the United States government about Israeli policy which was flat out wrong. That was the only part of the otherwise slanted and deceptive article which merited a slap on the wrist.  Rudoren wrote that the position of the U.S. is that Israeli towns and cities beyond the Green Line are illegal, when in fact this government has taken no position on the legality of Israeli Jewish towns in that region.  The actual correction appears at the end of this article.

Before we get to the begrudging but still humiliating factual correction, take a stroll through the rest of her article.

In this article headlined, “Israeli Decree on West Bank Settlements Will Harm Peace Talks, Palestinians Say,” Rudoren not only originally falsely stated that the United States believes the “settlements” are illegal.  Her language throughout the piece makes clear her hostility to Jews daring to live beyond what the esteemed Israeli statesman Abba Eban had termed the “Auschwitz borders,” the lines drawn in 1949 at the end of the war against the newly-reborn Israel, when surrounding Arab states attacked it rather than permit a Jewish State in their midst.

For one thing, she described the early stage approval of subsidies to homeowners in various places including in “Jewish settlements in the West Bank territory that Israel seized in the 1967 war.”  You’d never know that in 1967 Israel (again) fought a defensive war and gained the land in a battle for its existence.  The verb Rudoren chose, “seized,” suggests an aggressive action by the belligerent in military hostilities.

Given that the New York Times is treated like Torah from Sinai by most American Jews, no wonder they and the organizations those Jews tend to support believe that Israel should give away that territory to people who never possessed it,  and never – until Israel legally acquired the land – expressed any interest in owning or governing it themselves.

And it was not until the sixth paragraph of a 10 paragraph story that Israel is even permitted a voice to counter what Rudoren already set up as a move by the Israeli government to expand “settlements” which upset the Arab Palestinians and may now torpedo the “fragile peace talks.”

In the sixth paragraph the reader – if he is still reading – learns that all that happened is the Israeli government has made a completely routine and preliminary decision to provide assistance to homeowners in authorized towns and villages for things like “education, housing, infrastructure projects, cultural programs and sports, along with better mortgage rates and loans for new homeowners.”  Isn’t that what governments are supposed to do?  Take care of their citizens?

Rudoren distances her readers from identifying with Israelis who might otherwise be considered normal homeowners. She points out that, “Among the newcomers to the list are three formerly illegal outposts — Bruchin, Rachelim and Sansana — that obtained government recognition last year.”  Rudoren chose not to more concisely and correctly refer to those three towns as “legal and legitimate villages.”

But before Israel was permitted to offer a different point of view, Rudoren first ran condemnations of the move by the infamous Hanan Ashrawi, whose latest evidence of Jew and Israel hatred was the promotion on the website of an NGO she founded which claimed that Jews drink Christian blood on Passover.

In the space of three sentences, Rudoren paints a clear picture with Ashrawi’s words.  Ashrawi describes Israel’s move as a “confidence-destruction measure,” “attempts to grab more Palestinian land,” “provide settlers with preferential treatment” and the announcement that “the decision would have ‘a destructive impact’” on the current Israeli-Arab Palestinian talks.

Of course, Mark Regev was given a cameo appearance in the sixth paragraph.  But not to worry, because in the concluding three paragraphs of the article there is plenty to ensure that the lasting impression is one of an intransigent Israeli government filled with “many right-wing settlement supporters” which “refused to formally freeze settlement construction” in order to induce the oh-so-compliant, peace-supporting Arab Palestinians to even sit at the table with the Israelis.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

9 Responses to “NYT Gets US Position on Israel Wrong, Reveals Additional Animus”

  1. Oh, and the NYTimes could have added this:

    In 1997, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright already stated the Jewish communities are legal in an interview with Matt Lauer on NBC’s "The Today Show" on October 1, 1997, and asked in relation to building in Yesha and said: “I wasn't happy…I felt that going forward with those kinds of buildings was not helpful. Mr. Lauer pressed her and stated: “ It's legal. “, and Albright admitted: “It's legal.”.

    http://myrightword.blogspot.co.il/2011/12/perry-settlements-legal.html

  2. We've done a perfectly lousy job explaining that no, international law does NOT forbid the return of the Jews to the Jewish Holy Land. The truth is that the truth is not crystal clear, you have to read the Geneva Convention – which the State of Israel legally affirmed – with carefully, but a careful reading with some historical context definitely shows that the legal opinion of the vast majority of, e.g., Europe, that Jews living in Judea are outlaws, is bunk.

  3. What news? Israel always guilty, cow died too…

  4. I do not think it was a mistake, she did it on purpose with NYT knowing and supporting what she wrote. You can't take it back with corrections! It is out there and will be referenced and repeated.

  5. Alan Kardon says:

    Wrong, if we pressure our government and the times we can get them to publish the truth.

  6. Alan Kardon says:

    This article refers to "Private Palestine Property". Please identify what is Private property that is being built on?

  7. Rudoren showed an insensitivity to the victims of stone-throwing that is immoral. She showed a sympathy for those who do violence and an emotional identification with them.
    As a supposedly objective reporter she has not done her job.

  8. Marsha Roth says:

    This photo..Jodi Rudoren looks DRUNK!

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends an event held at the International Conference Center in Jerusalem of the Taglit Birthright program, where Netanyahu was the guest speaker. January 14, 2015.
Netanyahu ‘Will Go Anywhere Invited’ to Prevent Iran from Achieving Nuclear Weapons
Latest News Stories
ISIS executioner flanked by his next two victims.

ISIS terrorist murder of a Japanese citizen is terror against the world, says Israeli PM Netanyahu.

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends an event held at the International Conference Center in Jerusalem of the Taglit Birthright program, where Netanyahu was the guest speaker. January 14, 2015.

PM Binyamin Netanyahu says he’ll go anywhere he’s invited to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear weapons.

Argentine Federal Prosecutor Alberto Nisman.

Forensics show Argentina federal prosecutor, Alberto Nisman was murdered over the 1994 Jewish center bombing case.

Beth Israel Synagogue in West Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 'leave Canada' graffitied on its walls

In the Alberta province of Canada, a synagogue was defaced with huge block letters scrawled on its walls: ‘Leave Canada’

The small right-wing parties will hurt their ideological allies and voters, unless they get past their egos and ideological perfectionism and help their side for a change.

Japan is a very resilient nation, and they’ve chosen to respond to ISIS’s threats and blackmail demands with black humor. They’ve taken the photos that ISIS released and reworked them into various memes:

A 13 year old boy was maced by a gang in Paris. He was an easy target due to his kipa and tzitzit. What should the family do?

Miracles were added in France late last week when a soldier accidently fired a volley outside a Jewish center, harming no one.

F-16 fighter jets were scrambled to escort two US airliners faced with bomb threats as they headed to Atlanta airport Saturday afternoon.

The Hezbollah terror group says it will attack Israel with “wisdom” and take Lebanon into consideration.

This is the first time since 2012 that the dollar-shekel rate broke the 4.0 mark.

Most of the victims are showing at least some improvement, but the injuries are serious…

Berlin refuses to name German companies who helped Syria build its chemical weapons program.

Strange. It wasn’t considered as big a deal when it was Shimon Peres who was invited to the White House right before elections in ’96.

Netanyahu will reportedly be offering a spot on the Likud list to Caroline Glick.

Apparently the Arabs believe that all these years they voted for Labor, they were not voting for a Zionist party.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Beth Israel Synagogue in West Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 'leave Canada' graffitied on its walls

In the Alberta province of Canada, a synagogue was defaced with huge block letters scrawled on its walls: ‘Leave Canada’

Armed Palestinian Arabs march in protest against Israel in Qalandiya, on November 29, 2013.

Fatah is calling on Palestinian Arabs to protests against Israel on Jan. 26, and to boycott Israeli products

Seven Americans have volunteered to each take 100 lashes in place of Saudi blogger Raif Badawi.

The waning interest of young Jews in committing themselves either to activism on behalf of the Jewish State or to commitment to observing and learning about their own religion has been a recurrent theme in recent years. One rabbi decided he was going to take a fresh, creative approach to the problem. Rabbi Yosef Wilhelm of […]

Yemeni president and government resigns, shia rebels appear to seize control, al-Qaeda remains big concern

Despite claims the Mossad has gone rogue on Iran, Israel’s spy agency is not opposed to additional Iran sanctions.

Following terrorist knifing attack on Israelis, social media members extol the weapon, with #JeSuisCouteau.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/nyt-gets-us-position-on-israel-wrong-reveals-additional-animus/2013/08/08/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: