web analytics
July 23, 2014 / 25 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



NYT Gets US Position on Israel Wrong, Reveals Additional Animus

Two New York Times journalists get their facts wrong about Israel, and Wall Street Journal reporter prefers inaccuracies to corrections
NYT Jerusalem correspondent Jodi Rudoren wrote that the US believes the "settlements" are illegal. That has never been the US position.  The NYT had to issue a correction.

NYT Jerusalem correspondent Jodi Rudoren wrote that the US believes the "settlements" are illegal. That has never been the US position. The NYT had to issue a correction.
Photo Credit: Lori Lowenthal Marcus

The New York Times recognized that its correspondent in Jerusalem, Jodi Rudoren, had gone too far this time in blithely vilifying Jews who live and breathe beyond the so-called Green Line.

Rudoren ascribed a position to the United States government about Israeli policy which was flat out wrong. That was the only part of the otherwise slanted and deceptive article which merited a slap on the wrist.  Rudoren wrote that the position of the U.S. is that Israeli towns and cities beyond the Green Line are illegal, when in fact this government has taken no position on the legality of Israeli Jewish towns in that region.  The actual correction appears at the end of this article.

Before we get to the begrudging but still humiliating factual correction, take a stroll through the rest of her article.

In this article headlined, “Israeli Decree on West Bank Settlements Will Harm Peace Talks, Palestinians Say,” Rudoren not only originally falsely stated that the United States believes the “settlements” are illegal.  Her language throughout the piece makes clear her hostility to Jews daring to live beyond what the esteemed Israeli statesman Abba Eban had termed the “Auschwitz borders,” the lines drawn in 1949 at the end of the war against the newly-reborn Israel, when surrounding Arab states attacked it rather than permit a Jewish State in their midst.

For one thing, she described the early stage approval of subsidies to homeowners in various places including in “Jewish settlements in the West Bank territory that Israel seized in the 1967 war.”  You’d never know that in 1967 Israel (again) fought a defensive war and gained the land in a battle for its existence.  The verb Rudoren chose, “seized,” suggests an aggressive action by the belligerent in military hostilities.

Given that the New York Times is treated like Torah from Sinai by most American Jews, no wonder they and the organizations those Jews tend to support believe that Israel should give away that territory to people who never possessed it,  and never – until Israel legally acquired the land – expressed any interest in owning or governing it themselves.

And it was not until the sixth paragraph of a 10 paragraph story that Israel is even permitted a voice to counter what Rudoren already set up as a move by the Israeli government to expand “settlements” which upset the Arab Palestinians and may now torpedo the “fragile peace talks.”

In the sixth paragraph the reader – if he is still reading – learns that all that happened is the Israeli government has made a completely routine and preliminary decision to provide assistance to homeowners in authorized towns and villages for things like “education, housing, infrastructure projects, cultural programs and sports, along with better mortgage rates and loans for new homeowners.”  Isn’t that what governments are supposed to do?  Take care of their citizens?

Rudoren distances her readers from identifying with Israelis who might otherwise be considered normal homeowners. She points out that, “Among the newcomers to the list are three formerly illegal outposts — Bruchin, Rachelim and Sansana — that obtained government recognition last year.”  Rudoren chose not to more concisely and correctly refer to those three towns as “legal and legitimate villages.”

But before Israel was permitted to offer a different point of view, Rudoren first ran condemnations of the move by the infamous Hanan Ashrawi, whose latest evidence of Jew and Israel hatred was the promotion on the website of an NGO she founded which claimed that Jews drink Christian blood on Passover.

In the space of three sentences, Rudoren paints a clear picture with Ashrawi’s words.  Ashrawi describes Israel’s move as a “confidence-destruction measure,” “attempts to grab more Palestinian land,” “provide settlers with preferential treatment” and the announcement that “the decision would have ‘a destructive impact’” on the current Israeli-Arab Palestinian talks.

Of course, Mark Regev was given a cameo appearance in the sixth paragraph.  But not to worry, because in the concluding three paragraphs of the article there is plenty to ensure that the lasting impression is one of an intransigent Israeli government filled with “many right-wing settlement supporters” which “refused to formally freeze settlement construction” in order to induce the oh-so-compliant, peace-supporting Arab Palestinians to even sit at the table with the Israelis.

Nowhere in Rudoren’s article is there any mention of the horrific sacrifice Israel was forced to make just for the pleasure of “negotiating” with the Arab Palestinians – the agreement to release 104 convicted murderers of Israeli children, women and men, despite the promises made to the families of victims through the years by every Israeli prime minister that those prisoners would never ever be released.  That measure didn’t merit a single word.

No, Rudoren continued to harp to the very end about the failure of Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu to institute a “settlement freeze.” That failure, combined with the steps he has taken, such as the one around which this whole article was constructed, “have raised questions among Palestinians, Americans, and left-leaning Israelis over his seriousness about negotiations.”

His seriousness is what is at issue, and no one who reads her articles could think anything else. Really.  Increasing funding for education, infrastructure, cultural programs and sports is what will deliver the death knell to any forward movement in the elusive quest for peace in the Middle East. You can read that in the modern progressives’ official Torah from Sinai.  Believe it – they do.

As it happens, it turns out that Tuesday, July 7 was not a particularly good day for New York Times reporters who write about Israel. See Adam Kredo’s Washington Free Beacon report which explains that columnist of long-standing Thomas Friedman, in an effort to reinforce his personal brand of vilification of Israelis who live and breathe beyond a mythical Green Line, made this statement in a column: “One should never forget just how crazy some of Israel’s Jewish settlers are. They assassinated Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin when he tried to cede part of the West Bank for peace.”

But Rabin’s assassin lived in Herzliya, which has been a recognized part of Israel since 1948. Oops.

The New York Times is not the only mainstream media organ that exposed itself on August 7.  Many people believe the Wall Street Journal to be centrist leaning towards right wing.  But in what can only be considered a gallant effort to support his comrade-at-arms in the mainstream media plum post of Jerusalem, the Journal’s Charles Levinson gave us the Full Monty.

Levinson tweeted a defense of Maid Rudoren against another article critical of Rudoren’s errors in the Washington Free Beacon.  But you can just hear Rudoren putting her hands over her ears and saying, “please, with more help like that who needs right wing critics?”

This is what Levinson tweeted: “NYT’s @rudoren has done great work here. This attempted takedown alleges bias, but reads like written by @camera: http://bit.ly/1cv0sy2”  Got that?  Levinson thinks it’s a witty insult to compare a newspaper article to something written by CAMERA.

Newsflash: CAMERA corrects factual errors.  There is nothing embarrassing about being compared to CAMERA.  Far more embarrassing to be caught writing factually incorrect news articles.  Or even tweets.

♦     ♦     ♦     ♦ Three days after the article was first published and two days after the article ran in the print version, The New York Times placed the following comment beneath its online version:

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: August 7, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated the United States’ view of the West Bank settlements seized by Israel in the 1967 war. While much of the rest of the world considers them illegal, for several decades the United States has not taken a position on the settlements’ legality; In a statement on Tuesday, the State Department said, “We do not accept the legitimacy of continued settlement activity.”

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

Please use the Facebook Tab below to leave your comment:

9 Responses to “NYT Gets US Position on Israel Wrong, Reveals Additional Animus”

  1. Oh, and the NYTimes could have added this:

    In 1997, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright already stated the Jewish communities are legal in an interview with Matt Lauer on NBC’s "The Today Show" on October 1, 1997, and asked in relation to building in Yesha and said: “I wasn't happy…I felt that going forward with those kinds of buildings was not helpful. Mr. Lauer pressed her and stated: “ It's legal. “, and Albright admitted: “It's legal.”.

    http://myrightword.blogspot.co.il/2011/12/perry-settlements-legal.html

  2. We've done a perfectly lousy job explaining that no, international law does NOT forbid the return of the Jews to the Jewish Holy Land. The truth is that the truth is not crystal clear, you have to read the Geneva Convention – which the State of Israel legally affirmed – with carefully, but a careful reading with some historical context definitely shows that the legal opinion of the vast majority of, e.g., Europe, that Jews living in Judea are outlaws, is bunk.

  3. What news? Israel always guilty, cow died too…

  4. I do not think it was a mistake, she did it on purpose with NYT knowing and supporting what she wrote. You can't take it back with corrections! It is out there and will be referenced and repeated.

  5. Alan Kardon says:

    Wrong, if we pressure our government and the times we can get them to publish the truth.

  6. Alan Kardon says:

    This article refers to "Private Palestine Property". Please identify what is Private property that is being built on?

  7. Rudoren showed an insensitivity to the victims of stone-throwing that is immoral. She showed a sympathy for those who do violence and an emotional identification with them.
    As a supposedly objective reporter she has not done her job.

  8. Marsha Roth says:

    This photo..Jodi Rudoren looks DRUNK!

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Loading Disqus Comments ...
Current Top Story
Israel Air Force bombed a Hamas terrorist command center based in a hospital. The UN confirmed the hospital was evacuated before the raid.
UN Confirmed No Patients in Terror-Hospital that IAF Bombed (Video)
Latest News Stories

Tomer Sargon of Netivot heard that IDF soldiers haven’t been able to bath in days, for lack of water and showering facilities out in the field. So he took it upon himself to help, by driving down to the Gaza border with a truck filled with huge water containers, just so the soldiers could have […]

Hundreds of Arabs gathered near Kever Rachel Wednesday to attack IDF soldiers with stones and firebombs. Riots were also reported in Beit Omar, near Hebron.

A man was shot outside the Hadar Mall in Jerusalem Wednesday. According to a report on the Hebrew-language Ynet website, two individuals opened fire from a moped outside the mall this evening. No injuries or property damage was reported. Police said Wednesday night that a man suspected of having staged the attack was arrested in […]

Hamas terrorists fired mortar rounds Wednesday at an IDF field hospital on the Israeli side of the Gaza border, according to a report on Israel Radio. The Israeli army set up the hospital last week to treat Palestinian victims of Hamas’ “human shields” policy, but the report indicated that the terror gang has prevented wounded […]

The Al-Wafa hospital located near Shajuayia in Gaza City was a Hamas military compound.

US extends ban on flights to Israel despite lack of such precaution in similar or worse situations.

Hamas terrorists took over Waffa hospital in Gaza and were using it as a terror base. The IDF communicated with the medical staff to ensure no patients or staff were inside before blowing it up.

Hamas lunched a new massive barrage or rockets and missiles at southern Israel and as far north as Kiryat Malachi, near the southern edge of metropolitan Tel Aviv, shortly after 6 p.m. (11 a.m. EDT) Wednesday. The Iron Dome shot down two rockets aimed at Kiryat Malachi, which has a large industrial area. Sirens also […]

Did El Al intentionally spike prices, or was the sudden jump in air fares the normal function of airline economics?

Military spokesman: We’ve been trying for years to deal with tunnels, with no success.

Chicago 18-year-old to enlist in IDF; New Jersey woman to marry IDF Paratrooper fiance

IDF soldiers are receiving care packages from citizens all over Israel.

Rubio: Civilian deaths in Gaza “100 percent” responsibility of Hamas

Foreign Minister protests UNRWA storage of missiles, equipment in UN facilities.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Ben Gurion Airport

US extends ban on flights to Israel despite lack of such precaution in similar or worse situations.

Wounded Golani commander returns to his troops on July 22, 2014.

Golani brigade commander was hospitalized after being wounded, but he returned to the battlefield to complete the mission.

The Ruderman Family Foundation rewards Jewish organizations for promoting inclusion of those with disabilities.

Israel’s transportation minister said cancelling flights to Israel is like handing a prize to terrorists.

Turkey is attempting to be seen as the protectorate for the Palestinian Arabs.

Members of congress should experience Israelis’ lives. Bomb Shelter Museum will be in D.C. July 22.

Protesters became violent in several anti-Israel/pro-terror rallies in Europe over the weekend.

Not an altogether terrible day for Israel at the UN, given there were no riots or demands that Israel surrender unilaterally.

    Latest Poll

    Israel's Iron Dome Anti-Missile System:





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/nyt-gets-us-position-on-israel-wrong-reveals-additional-animus/2013/08/08/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: