web analytics
July 25, 2014 / 27 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
Sections
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



It’s All In How It’s Said, Or Not Said

(Names changed)


 


         We all have our favorite charities. We tend to give more money to those charities that are close to our own experience, that have helped us or someone we know, or have touched our heartstrings in some way. Most of us give to as many charities as we can, even if it is a small amount. Non-Jewish door-to-door canvassers for secular charities like the Cancer or Heart Foundation have told me that they love collecting in Jewish neighborhoods, because almost every door they knock on responds with something, and with a smile.

 

         In our hearts, when we give tzedakah, we hope we will never need to call on the charities to help us but, as well spouses know, that isn’t the reality. Charities like the MS Society, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Cystic Fibrosis, etc., become all too familiar in the life of well spouses who often look to them for the support and help they need. In most Jewish communities, our own support charities often come to our aid as well. But asking for help is painful. You feel fragile and vulnerable. And that is why it is so very important, how the charity representative responds to you, whether with help or the inability to help. Rightly or wrongly, it can even affect future donations.

 

         Leah was trying to get help with an air ambulance transport. She desperately needed to transport her ailing husband and normal air travel was out of the question. Many of her friends were calling their contacts to see what assistance they could get. Leah was beyond desperate as she wondered how she would pay the $16,000 bill that she would have to put on her charge card.

 

         Through a mutual contact, she received a call from a gentleman who told her that “for sure” he could help her. He gave her two numbers to call. He told Leah to say he referred her to them. One had access to private air transportation that often transported people like her husband. The other would probably help with the bill if the transport option didn’t work out. The man gave Leah his three personal phone numbers, and told her to get back to him. If by some slight chance these charities couldn’t help, he had other contacts. Leah was beyond delighted. Help had finally come.

 

         Leah called the first number and using the gentleman’s name got right through to the appropriate person. Leah told her story and explained her need. In response she was coolly told that that organization only helped transport people with a certain type of disease and not others, like her husband’s. And then the phone went dead.

 

         Leah was hurt. There was no “I’m sorry for your plight,” or “I really wish we could help.” There was no “Maybe you should call…” or any words of support or encouragement. She told me a few kind words would have helped ease the disappointment. It had been so hard to ask for charity in the first place. But just being treated in this manner was devastating. She felt worse now than before making the call.

 

         Summoning her courage, she tried the next number. She was told the same thing in much the same manner. To make matters worse when, as per his advice, she called back the gentleman who “was sure” he could get her help – he did not take her call. After leaving several messages telling him what had happened, and again asking for his help, Leah was pained when he never returned her call.

 

         Having no other places to try, she finally gave up. She told me that, as panicked as she had been before, she felt worse now. The coldness and apparent lack of caring of the people she had spoken to, along with being ignored by the person who promised to get her help, left her feeling more deserted, alone and more helpless than she had been before looking for charitable help.

 

         Years have gone by since the incident, but Leah and her friends refuse to give to the charities that treated her so coldly. “A kind word, even while telling me they couldn’t help, would have made all the difference. Don’t these people realize how hard it is to even ask for charity? I know it’s wrong, but I can’t bring myself to give to these causes.”

 

         When Chaya Sarah’s husband was transferred, she wanted to move her ailing father to her new city so that she could continue to care for him. As a new resident, she had no knowledge of the facilities available. Many people told her to speak to the head of a specific charity that they felt could direct her and give her guidance. When Chaya Sarah called, she was told, “Oh we don’t do that!” No further referral or assistance of any kind was given. Not even a word of support.

 

         Now, years later, Chaya Sarah volunteers for many agencies, but not this one. She gives generously to many charities but only a token to this one. She told me she prioritizes her tzedakah dollars and the agency that treated her so heartlessly is not on her priority list. Like Leah, she felt fragile and vulnerable when she called for help. A kind word – even without their ability to help, would have made things less unbearable.

 

         Not every agency can help with all the needs and requests they receive. But, the manner in which their inability to help is expressed, can mean so much to the state of mind of the person asking for help. It may also affect the support the agency receives later.

 

         You can reach me at annnovick@hotmail.com

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “It’s All In How It’s Said, Or Not Said”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
John Kerry
Entire Israeli Cabinet Rejects Kerry’s Proposed Ceasefire, Talks Continue
Latest Sections Stories
Respler-072514

The real solution to bullying is to empower the bullied child.

Schonfeld-logo1

Time outs increases compliance and positive behavior far more than other forms of discipline

Schild-Edwin

Interestingly, sometimes people who have a very high self-awareness may experience intense reactions to circumstances that others might respond to more mildly.

“You Touro graduates are automatically soldiers in [Israel’s] struggle, and we count on you,” Rothstein told the graduates.

The lemonana was something else. Never had we seen a green drink look so enticing.

On his marriage, he wrote: “This is what I believe: something of the core, of the essence of this meaningful and life-affirming Judaism will not be absent from our home” (1882).

With the recent kidnapping by the Hamas and the barbaric murder of three children – Gilad Shaar, Eyal Yifrach and Naftali Frankel, we believe that the best answer to honor the memory of those murdered is to continue building those very communities – large and small – that our enemies are trying to destroy.

Written entirely through Frayda’s eyes, the reader is drawn by her unassuming personality.

Adopting an ancient exegetical approach that is based on midrashic readings of the text, thematic connections that span between various books of the Bible are revealed.

While Lipman comes from an ultra-Orthodox background and is an Orthodox rabbi, he offers a breath of fresh air when he suggests that “polarization caused by extremism and isolationism in the religious community may be the greatest internal threat to the future of the Jewish people”

The Joys of Yiddish, Leo Rosten defines a mentch as “someone to admire and emulate, someone of noble character.”

Certainly today’s communication via e-mail, Facebook, Twitter and the like, including the ubiquitous Whatsapp, has reduced the need to talk with people and communicate at length.

More Articles from Ann Novick

When one is blind one learns to use Braille to read. When one cannot walk, a wheelchair gives mobility. Sign language allows a mute person to speak and ocular implants assist in hearing when one is deaf. These are all compensatory strategies that help a person function despite his disability. But compensatory strategies are not just for physical problems. Understanding our psychological weaknesses and setting up our lives to ensure that we are not tempted to repeat our past mistakes, is as necessary as any aid to the disabled.

Well spouses have often discovered that their friends and relatives, despite their closeness to the situation, often don’t realize the tremendous emotional impact living with chronic illness has on the family. With the best intentions, suggestions, ideas and criticism are offered, based on the non-experience of those with healthy families. Even when the good intentioned get a taste of the difficulties, it is sometimes not enough for them to then identify and understand what the family of the chronically ill must face on a constant basis.

Over the past two weeks I have shared letters from a therapist and a well spouse. Both of the letters gave personal insights into the process of losing hope, how we react when that happens and some ways of coping when test scores, diagnosis and just simple repetitive behavior indicate that change for the better is impossible.

Dear Ann,

I’ve read your last few articles on psycho-neurological testing (Oct.8-22) with interest. As a therapist who has counseled couples dealing with chronic illness, I’d like to give you another perspective.

Dear Ann,

Your articles on the Neuro-Psychological Testing were right on (October 8-22). My husband underwent testing twice and your articles explained it things exactly the way they were. Besides the test, we also tried therapy.

Very often when we can’t face our big hurts or big loses we focus on the little ones. We can discuss those. We can cry over the small loses, be angry at the smaller hurts even though it may look trite and sound ridiculous to others.

Over the last two weeks we have been discussing one way in which well spouses can determine whether behavior displayed by their ill partners is caused by their illness or is a way they have chosen to act. We have focused on Psycho-Neurological testing, what it can tell us, as well as its pros and cons.

Last week I discussed a question that haunts many well spouses: not knowing if the difficult and often inappropriate behavior frequently displayed by their partners are caused by the disease and therefore not-controllable, or if the behavior is a choice the spouse makes and can therefore be changed. This doubt can be the source of much frustration and many marital disagreements. One way of alleviating this doubt is by having a psycho- neurological work up done. But that path is not so simple.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/magazine/its-all-in-how-its-said-or-not-said/2007/07/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: