Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
For the second time in two months, President Bush has pledged that if necessary the United States would militarily defend Israel against Iran.
Bush continued, “I made it clear, and I’ll make it clear again, that we will use military might to protect our ally, Israel.
The president’s statements echoed those he made aboard Air Force One the first week of February when he told reporters that the U.S. would respond militarily if Israel were threatened by Iran.
“I am concerned about a person [Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] that one, tries to rewrite the history of the Holocaust, and two, has made it clear that his intentions are to destroy Israel,” the president said then.
“Israel is a solid ally of the United States [and] we will rise to Israel’s defense if need be.”Asked at that point if he meant the U.S. would come to Israel’s defense militarily, Bush said, “You bet, we’ll defend Israel.”
Political observers were hard pressed to recall a similarly explicit declaration by an American president regarding American military intervention on behalf of Israel.
In fact, after Bush’s initial statement seven weeks ago, there was expectation in some quarters that either the president himself or an administration spokesman would seek to tone down the implications of the remarks.
No such clarification was forthcoming, and the fact that the president felt comfortable expressing similar sentiments this week would seem to indicate that he views his pledge as more than mere rhetoric.
Bush, embattled as never before in his presidency, with plummeting approval numbers and a steady stream of criticism coming from Republicans as well as Democrats on issues ranging from the war in Iraq to the Dubai ports fiasco, has sought in recent days to bolster his image as a strong leader and regain support for his policies.
In the speech in Cleveland, and at a press conference in Washington on Tuesday, the president reiterated his determination to see the war in Iraq through to a successful conclusion.
On Iran, Bush stressed that he was hoping to “solve this issue diplomatically” with a “united message” from the world to Iranian leaders that “your desire to have a nuclear weapon is unacceptable.”
About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Almost immediately the audience began singing and clapping and continued almost without stop throughout the rest of the concert.
As of late, vintage has definitely been in vogue in the Orthodox community.
One minute you’re shaving shwarma off a pit, then the shwarma guy tells you he read a (fake) WhatsApp that the boys are dead.
I probe a little deeper and Shula takes me into the world of phantom pains and prosthetic limbs.
This went on until she had immersed eighty times, and then Hashem at last took pity upon her.
Shame is often confused with guilt and humiliation.
Because Menachem lives in Israel, he can feel the ruach in the air.
Perhaps you can reach a compromise during this news frenzy, whereby you will feel more comfortable while he can still follow the latest events.
Leon experienced the War of Independence from a soldier’s perspective, while remaining true to his Jewish ideals and beliefs.
Chabad of Arizona centers recently hosted an evening of remembrance to mark the 20th yahrzeit of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.
What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.
With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.
As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.
George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.
Readers who’ve stuck with the Monitor over the years will forgive this rerun of sorts, but as we approach the fortieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War – and with the stench of presidential indecisiveness hanging so heavily over Washington these days – it seemed only appropriate to revisit Richard Nixon’s role in enabling Israel to recover from the staggering setbacks it suffered in the first week of fighting.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/magazine/news-magazine/bush-again-vows-u-s-military-action-on-israels-behalf/2006/03/22/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: