Last week I discussed whether a close friend has a right to expect to know everything that is going on in our lives in order for them to be supportive of us. Is the desire to know our pain a selfish act or one of generosity? Must we share our pain in order to get support? When I discussed this topic with some well spouses, they indicated that how a person responds to their pain often determines whether they will open up to them again, or not.
If the support takes the form of questions − uncomfortable information seeking questions, or takes the form of challenging the validity of our decisions; chances are that person will not be someone they would confide in again. The consensus was that questions in a time of pain were obtrusive, not supportive.
Questioning the wisdom of what they had done made many feel the need to justify their actions and just served to undermine a difficult decision. Either way, it forced the person in crisis to deal with a situation they did not want to deal with at that time. It made them sorry they ever confided in the friend in the first place. Here are some of their examples.
Shani lived in a different city than her youngest daughter, Yaeli. Yaeli was no longer religious but since she lived far away, Shani saw no reason to share that painful information with her community. Her daughter’s life style embarrassed Shani. One friend would constantly ask Shani when Yaeli and her family were coming for a Yom Tov.
Shani would invent a reply each time. Not satisfied, the friend would then question Shani as to why she didn’t go to them for the holidays. For two years this repetitive conversation occurred before each Yom Tov. Shani told me that by now you’d think her friend would figure something was up and stop asking.
Therefore, if Shani needed a confidant, it would never be this friend whose constant questioning showed either a lack of insight or inappropriate curiosity. Either way, these questions made her a person Shani would not confide in, no matter how close they were.
Harold’s married son, Avi decided to buy himself a motorcycle. Harold was beside himself. He could not sleep, constantly worrying about Avi’s safety. But Avi was a self- supporting adult. Harold had discussed his concerns with him when he first mentioned buying the bike. The fact that Avi always wore a helmet, took a class before getting his license and stayed within the speed limit helped, but did not take away Harold’s fears for his son’s safety.
He would have felt better if he could share his concerns with a friend, but before he had a chance to do so, his friend called him and questioned how Harold could have “allowed” his son to buy the bike. Didn’t he know a motorcycle was dangerous? Didn’t he care about his family? Etc.
The questions only made Harold defensive. He felt he needed to justify something he was not comfortable with. How he wished his friend had shown concern without the critical, challenging questions. It would have made him a confidant instead of an adversary.
On the way home from a well spouse support group meeting, Rosie confided in Miriam about an argument she and her husband were having about selling their handicapped van and replacing it with a smaller car. Rosie found the van hard to drive. It was getting harder and harder to push the wheelchair in and out of the van. Rosie felt that the money they would save on gas by using a small car would allow her husband to take adaptive transport. This would make Rosie’s life much easier.
But Rosie’s husband wouldn’t hear of it. Rosie felt it was totally selfish of him. Long after the argument was history, Miriam kept making reference to Rosie’s husband as selfish. Every time Miriam used the words. “Your selfish husband,” Rosie regretted ever having said anything.
She told me, “I can beat up my husband verbally, but I hate when anyone else does. I am so sorry I ever told her about the fight. I needed to vent and I certainly picked the wrong person.”
The well spouses concluded that if you want to be a confidant, if you want to support a friend, don’t challenge your friend’s decisions and question the way she is dealing with her problem. Don’t allow your curiosity to be more important than her need for privacy. She may be angry with her spouse or children today, but will still love them tomorrow.
Listen and be supportive without condemning his family, even when he has. Do not confront him with what he has confided in you, once his anger has passed. Do not call her loved ones names or view them negatively. If you want a friend to confide in you, let them take the lead.
If you do not judge, do not question, but just listen or observe without negative comments you have a much better chance at being someone we will share with − if we choose to share. And even if you can do all this, there are still people who may choose not to share and hold their privacy dear. So, if we choose not to share, respect that.
You can reach me at Annnovick@hotmail.com
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.