web analytics
May 26, 2015 / 8 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
Special Features
Sponsored Post


IDF Strikes on ‘Militarized’ Gazan Homes is Permissible in War

When houses are used for military purposes, they are legitimate military targets under international law.
Hamas terrorists usually fired rockets at Israeli towns from civilian areas in Gaza.

Hamas terrorists usually fired rockets at Israeli towns from civilian areas in Gaza.
Photo Credit: IDF Spokesperson's Unit / IDF Blog

On July 8, the IDF initiated Operation Protective Edge in order to restore security to Israel’s civilian population under constant rocket fire from the Gaza Strip. During the operation, the IDF has struck a number of houses throughout Gaza that were being used for military purposes.

It is essential that those observing and commenting on the military conflict between Israel and Hamas understand that according to the most widely recognized corpus of law governing military conflicts, the use by Hamas of human shields and the placement of their fighters and weapons in residential areas is a flagrant violation of international law.

Hamas conducts its military activities from deep within residential areas in Gaza. By doing so, it exploits the IDF’s desire and efforts to avoid harm to Palestinian Arab civilians. In many cases, Hamas uses its commanders’ own homes, where their families and other civilians may be residing, for military purposes.

Some of these houses are used for weapons storage, command and control centers, or communications.

Watch in this video when after the IDF’s initial strike on a target in a residential area, the explosion is followed by massive secondary blasts. Those “after blasts” reveal that the terrorists in Gaza had stored a large cache of weapons right next to homes of ordinary Gazan civilians.

When houses are used for military purposes, they become legitimate military targets under international law.

The IDF aims its attacks against legitimate military targets as defined under the relevant rules of international law.

For example, Article 58 of the Fourth Geneva Convention requires that combatants “endeavour to remove the civilian population, individual civilians and civilian objects under their control from the vicinity of military objects” and “avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas.”

And Article 51 provides even more authority proving the terrorists in Gaza are the ones in this conflict who are violating international law, not the Israel Defense Force:

The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.

While neither Israel or Hamas are signatories to the Geneva Conventions, that has never stopped Israel’s critics from excoriating the Jewish State for its alleged violations of that military and legal set of rules.

In order to accurately determine military targets, the IDF employs advanced methods, including multiple levels of intelligence, the provision of legal advice, and extensive prior training provided to operational commanders.

Even when a house is considered a lawful military target, the IDF makes great efforts to minimize potential harm to the surrounding civilian population. For example, the IDF may use real-time visual coverage in order to assess the civilian presence at a target. The IDF also carefully chooses weaponry and ammunition that will help to minimize any harm to civilians. In certain instances, the IDF also provides advance warning before striking a target.

Many of the IDF’s efforts in this regard go beyond its legal obligations and the accepted practice of other militaries operating in urban areas. Hamas, however, exploits these humanitarian attempts by the IDF to provide advance warning by using civilians as human shields in order to deter attacks.

Furthermore, IDF commanders routinely abort strikes when they determine that the collateral damage from an attack would be excessive in relation to the military advantage anticipated. This is never a consideration for Hamas, which shoots its weapons indiscriminately at all and any part of Israel no matter what might be hit.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

8 Responses to “IDF Strikes on ‘Militarized’ Gazan Homes is Permissible in War”

  1. They fire rockets from residential areas, even homes, and wonder why these get bombed.

  2. God is great, but Hamas is going to get their neighbors killed –for nothing.

  3. God is great, but Hamas is going to get their neighbors killed –for nothing.

  4. Gene Strong says:

    Destroy Gaza
    Flatten everything..

  5. Then why can’t you turn off their Power and gas supply?

  6. Uzi Kattan says:

    So wipe them out already!! They were targets by Jewish law!!’

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Former Israel Ambassador to the UN Dore Gold.
Bibi Seals Nationalist Policy with Dore Gold Heading Foreign Ministry
Latest Special-features Stories
Fatou 0. Bensouda and the ICC HQ in the Hague

Bensouda suggested it was in “the best interest” of Hamas and Israel to provide the needed information.

Minister and chair of Bayit Yehudi party, Naftali Bennett.

The primary road block is the position that Bayit Yehudi party head Naftali Bennett will receive.

Baruch Marzel.

Marzel not sorry Yachad party’s loss cost Bayit Yehudi seats in Knesset. Bennett accuses Netanyahu of thinking he is a sucker.

Yoav Horowitz

Who is Horowitz? He’s Netanyahu’s eyes and ears. He’s very close to him, literally his personal representative everywhere…

in a new report, Amnesty International charges “Gaza armed groups’ with war crimes in last summer’s Operation Protective Edge.

If there are no surprises, Netanyahu is expected to form a coalition, after some tough negotiations, with the Likud, Bayit Yehudi, Kulanu, Yisrael Beytenu, UTJ and Shas.

One wonders how many Prime Ministers Herzog envisions sitting in that one chair at the same time.

Netanyahu is expected to have 61 recommendations in his favor.

There’s much disappointment within Yesh Atid as they head into the oppositions.

Final voter counts are in, if Yachad doesn’t petition the courts over voter fraud…

“The truth is it’s surprising to us as well, but it turns out each one of us voted their hearts.”

The anti-Bibi campaign’s quiet change in tax status both came too late and constitutes an admission of wrongdoing.

If the media hadn’t been so eager to oust Netanyahu, voter apathy could have made that happen.

Netanyahu said he wants to have a government formed within the next 2 to 3 weeks.

The overwhelming electoral victory by the Likud was nothing less than a revolution, and an absolutely clear mandate from the people.

At 50% of the votes counted, the Likud pulls way ahead… but what will the remaining 50% do?

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
The city of Palmyra in Syria was captured by ISIS on May 21, 2015.

This week ISIS captured two major cities, one in Iraq, one in Syria. Assad’s escape plan revealed.

Avigdor Liberman

Liberman apologizes for describing Netanyahu’s decision to meet with head of Arab Joint Party List as “autistic.”

Was the flub the result of the snub, or was Obama simply inadequately prepared for his meeting with the Saudi princes?

U.S. government documents reveal government knew within days terrorists were behind Benghazi attacks

Shaked: ‘ the judiciary, rather than the elected representatives of the people, wield the power to govern’

Yom Yerushalayim brought out lots of students, adults and supporters of Israel.

ISIS leader killed in raid by U.S. commandos, now ISIS ‘threatening to kill Obama and Christians.’

Iran caught red-handed trying to purchase equipment to pursue nuclear weaponization.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/special-features/israel-at-war-operation-protective-edge/idf-strikes-on-militarized-gazan-homes-is-permissible-in-war/2014/07/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: