web analytics
August 22, 2014 / 26 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘Achille Lauro’

Holder Won’t Prosecute Palestinian Killers of 54 U.S. Civilians

Sunday, March 10th, 2013

News broke out last week that the US has captured Osama Bin-Laden’s son-in-law, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith. It appears that the former Al-Qaeda spokesman was picked up as he was traveling from Turkey to Amman.

But in Amman, capital city of Jordan, resides a woman who was far more active than Abu Ghaith in killing and maiming American citizens. Ahlam Tamimi, described as a university student and part-time journalist, planned the Sbarro massacre of August 2001 in Jerusalem, and personally led the guitar-case carrying bomber to the crowded destination.

President Obama is planning to visit Israel, the Palestinian Authority, and Amman, Jordan this month. He could do a great service in the fight against terrorism by publicly committing his administration to the active prosecution of Palestinians who willfully murdered and wounded American citizens. U.S. terror victims are not asking for favors; we are asking our government to bring justice to those who have been devastated by wanton Palestinian terror funded by U.S. tax dollars.

Fifteen people were murdered in the Sbarro massive explosion, including two American citizens, and another four Americans were wounded. Tamimi was arrested, tried, and sentenced to sixteen life sentences in Israeli jail. But in October, 2011, she went free as part of the deal Israel made to release captive soldier Gilad Shalit. Today, Tamimi sits in Amman where she has her own talk show. As to her role in the bombing, one can hear it in her own words:




The story of Tamimi is the story of failed U.S. law enforcement as it should apply to Palestinian terrorists. After the murder of Leon Klinghoffer on the Achille Lauro, in 1985, the U.S. passed a set of laws to make a terror act against a U.S. citizen anywhere in the world an offense prosecutable in U.S. federal court. A summary of the laws may be found here. These laws form the basis for the extradition of terrorists and pirates, but, to date, the U.S. has never applied these laws to a Palestinian terrorist involved in the death or injury of an American citizen.

This state of affairs is not due to a lack of information: from the 1993 signing of the Oslo Accords to 2006, the tail end of the “Second Intifada,” Palestinian terrorists have murdered 54 American citizens and wounded another 84—including this author and his son—a total of 72 separate terror attacks. The FBI dutifully opened files on every attack and a new office was opened in the Department of Justice to “monitor” such cases: the Office of Justice for Victims of Overseas Terrorism (OJVOT).

If anything should be abolished during the present “sequester,” it is this office: the number of Palestinian terrorists tried since this OJVOT came into existence in 2005 is equal to the number prior to that date: Zero.

While no Palestinian terrorist has ever been extradited by the U.S., the DoJ has been busy coordinating with Israel the transfer to the U.S. of accused drug dealers and wanted criminals. Since 2004, two years after my son and I were the recipients of Palestinian shrapnel from a suicide bombing, I have begged and pleaded with U.S. officials to prosecute Palestinian terrorists. While their responses have uniformly been of sincere concern and determination (“The United States is committed to seeking justice for our citizens victimized by terrorism whether at home or abroad…”—AG Holder to this author), no Palestinian terrorist has ever been prosecuted.

When Israel was set to release hundreds of convicted terrorists in the aforementioned Shalit deal, I frantically contacted officials in the US government: the two women who brought “our” bomber to downtown Jerusalem were on the launch pad for release. The U.S. belatedly passed along to the Israeli government that no terrorist with American blood on his or her hands should be released. This note was given the day before the prisoner exchange. Needless to say, Israel ignored the request and not a word was said in Washington about the matter.

The reason is simple: Washington never expected Israel to comply, because our cases are irrelevant to the FBI and the DoJ. When the terrorists were released in exchange for the Israeli soldier, the FBI could not even figure out who got out: they could not translate the names because identity numbers were missing digits. Finally, an American lawyer who has worked harder than all of the various governmental agencies combined for U.S. terror victims, informed the FBI that 15 terrorists directly involved in the murder and maiming of American civilians walked free.

In The Matter Of The United States Of America Against Abu Abbas

Sunday, May 25th, 2003

The Palestinian Authority’s call for the United States to release captured Achille Lauro thug Abu Abbas is not only the height of cynicism but is also a virtual declaration that they are free to target anyone and anything, at a time and place of their choosing, in the name of Palestinian nationalism.

With straight faces, Senior PA official and Arafat confidant, Saeb Erekat and others, argued last week that since President Clinton was a signatory to an interim Oslo amnesty agreement covering unlawful acts committed by PLO members before the signing of the Oslo treaty in 1993, Abbas cannot be prosecuted for the 1986 killing of American Leon Klinghoffer on the Achille Lauro.

Surely this is not the first time that Arafat and the Palestinians have tried to gain the benefits of the Oslo agreements on the one hand while having scuttled them by refusing to comply with their substantive terms. But it is the most outrageous. In view of the history of persistent Palestinian noncompliance, the breakup at Camp David and the continuing intifada, the notion of the continuing applicability of Oslo is just laughable. And the Arafat crowd knows it.

Moreover, Leon Klinghoffer was an American citizen killed on the high seas on an Italian ship! What can that conceivably have to do with an amnesty agreement covering acts against Israel? If Abbas had gone to New York City in 1985 and murdered an American citizen on line at an American Airlines terminal, could he now not be prosecuted because of some interim Oslo agreement?

This also cannot not elude Arafat, et al., who usually go to great lengths to at least publicly deplore terrorist violence.

Why then the obviously foolish call for the release of Abbas?

Abbas was caught last week in Iraq, where he has lived for years under the protection of Saddam Hussein. Israeli intelligence reports, based upon information gathered through interrogations of prisoners taken during Operation Defensive Shield, say he continued as head of the Palestine Liberation Front and regularly interacted with other expatriate terrorists given safe harbor in Iraq. In addition, the reports maintain that the PLF was employed by the Iraqi government with the aim of carrying out terrorist attacks in Israel. And, although little known, Abbas remains on the PLO Executive Committee, its highest body.

It would seem that Mr. Arafat has a real need to stay on the good side of Mr. Abbas, a former and doubtless still, comrade-in-arms, with quite a story to tell. Say, as in turning state’s evidence?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/in-the-matter-of-the-united-states-of-america-against-abu-abbas/2003/05/25/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: