web analytics
May 1, 2016 / 23 Nisan, 5776

Posts Tagged ‘Boycott’

Best Response to EU Product Labeling: Buy Labeled Products

Tuesday, December 1st, 2015

(JNi.media) The Zionist Foundation For Israel in collaboration with My Israel have issued a list you may want to print out and stick on you fridge, or re-post to your email and Facebook friends (and all your other friends and apps): All the settlements products some poor folks in Europe aren’t able to purchase because their local supermarket obeys the Brussels’ issued directives.

And if you are an enterprising individual, we highly recommend you start an online shop dedicated to EU labeled products.

The endeavor is titled “Europe Marks- Israel Buys,” but with a little bit of effort, Europe and the US, too, could start shopping Judea and Samaria.

EUROPE MARKS- ISRAEL BUYS

Food and Beverages

Abadi Bakery – Atarot Industrial park
Achiya Farm- excellent olive oil
Achva- Achdut Chalva and Candies- Barkan Industrial park
Adumim Fish- Adomin Industrial park
Alchoham- alchoholic bevreges- Barkan
Anis House of Nature, milk products- Itamar
Atlas Candies- Atarot
Barkan Candies- Barkan Industrial park
Better and Different, vegan foods- Adumim Industrial park
Etz HaSade Flour- Yitzhar
Gila’ad Spices- Elon Moreh
Givot Olam Goat Milk- Itamar
HaAretz Milk, goat milk products- Susya
HaGolan Brewery- Bazelet Beer
Harduf Eggs- Itamar Givot Olam
HaShomron Meats, Inc.- Karnei Shomron
Israeli Salts- Oz Salts, HaHaretz Salts production
Keshet Natural Drinks- Ramat HaGolan
Kfar Eggs, excellent foods- Barkan Industrial park
Lebell- bakery products- Gush Etzion
Louiza Tea- Elon Moreh
Maya- Adumim Industrial park
Meshek Tzuriel milk production- goat milk and goat milk yogurt
Michveret Negohot- excellent honey- Negohot
Netanel Spices- Barkan Industrial park
Nimrod Dairy Products- Nimrod
Openhimer Candies- Atarot Industrial park
Pomerantz Juices Inc., soft drinks- Mevo Horon
Ramat HaGolan Cheeses- Ani’am
Ramat HaGolan Milk Production, milk products- Katzrin Industrial park
Riko Empanadas, South American foods- Rimonim
Sakemach- Whole Weat- Jordan Valley
Sde Bar Foods- Nokdim
Shamir Salads- Barkan Industrial park
Sharp delicacies, sausages- Elon Moreh Industrial park
Shel Gal- pilsbury- Atarot Industrial park
Shemesh Spices- Karnei Shomron
Shimurei Motola, canned goods- Emannuel Industrial park
Super Drinks- Atarot Industrial park
Ta’aman- snacks and bevreges- Mishor Adumim
Tekoa Mushrooms- Tekoa
T’marim Organic Food- Tomer
T’vuot Bary- Israeli cakes and cupcakes
Zehavi- Yemenite delicacies

 

Jewelry and Cosmetics
Ahava Cosmetics- Mitzpeh Shalem
Esbei Kedem, Carmel Cosmetics- Mt. Hevron South
Hlavin- Barkan Industrial park
Olah Soaps- Dolev
Sabon BeAlma- natural soaps- K’far Tapoach
Sboneto- home made natural soap- Kokhav HaShahar
Shefa Briut- Jordan Valley

 

Wines

Ahava Cosmetics- Mitzpeh Shalem
Esbei Kedem, Carmel Cosmetics- Mt. Hevron South
Hlavin- Barkan Industrial park
Olah Soaps- Dolev
Sabon BeAlma- natural soaps- K’far Tapoach
Sboneto- home made natural soap- Kokhav HaShahar
Shefa Briut- Jordan Valley

 

Miscellaneous

Beitili Furniture- Barkan Industrial park
Falik Plastic Bags- Mevo Hama
Flatfut- Photography Products- Karnei Shomron
Frid Blankets- Ariel
Irit Prints- Adumim Industrial park
Josef Kaufman Camping- Karnei Shomron
Keter Plastics- Barkan Industrial park
Kravitz Office Supplies- Nili
Modan Bags- Shaked
Spideshe Plastic Grass- Gilgal
Sus Etz Toys- Adumim Industrial park

JNi.Media

Businessmen Want Rabbinic Boycott of Palestinian Authority Food Items

Wednesday, November 25th, 2015

Food industry executives are calling for a boycott of Palestinian Authority items, some of which carry a stamp of approval as kosher by respected rabbis.

One food manufacturer told Globes Business newspaper:

They stab us. The world boycotts us, and we act like idiots and help them [Arabs] make a living.

One of the products on the potential boycott list is the Medjool date, a high-quality and relatively expensive date.

The Medjool dates in packages stamped as “Made in Palestine” carry a kosher certificate of high standing under the approval of “Rabbi Efrati.”

The Gatestone Institute reported this week that Palestinian Authority farmers in the Jordan Valley are able to grow Medjool dates thanks to a Jewish resident in the area whom they told that salty soil was not suitable for growing the fruit.

The farmer, Inon Rosenblum, used techniques to improve the soil so that it produces dates, grapes and herbs for export. His employees are Palestinian Authority Arabs, and he gave date palm seedlings to his Arab neighbors so they could grow them

Jews and Arabs living in the Jordan Valley account for approximately 40% of Medjool dates around the world.

Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu

Economic Cooperation Pact between Italian Region and Samaria Defies EU Labeling

Friday, November 20th, 2015

(JNi.media) Despite the EU’s decision to label products from the settlements in Judea and Samaria, an economic cooperation agreement has been signed Wednesday between the Valtellina valley in the Sondrio province in northern Italy and the Shomron Regional Council in Samaria, Walla reported. The signing ceremony, in the city of Sondrio, at the heart of the Valley, was attended by vintners from both regions.

Valtellina is home to 180 thousand inhabitants, the Shomron Council boasts 29 Jewish towns and villages, with an estimated 25 thousand residents. The ceremony was held by Shomron Council Chairman Yossi Dagan and Province of Sondrio President Luca della Briotta. The signing of the cooperation agreement was made possible with the mediation of the Vice-Chair of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, Dr. Fiorello Provera MEP, formerly the president of Valtellina.

“With great pleasure, We, the undersigned, Regional Directors of Valtellina and Shomron respectively, announce our agreement for bilateral relations between our two regions, which will begin immediately with the signing of this agreement,” reads the pact. “The goal of this declaration of cooperation is to promote culture, science, industry, trade, tourism, agriculture and technology between leaders in each field in ​​our communities.”

After the signing, President della Briotta said “the friendship between the region of Valtellina and Samaria has lasted a long time, and we hope that this friendship will grow stronger, and will gain ground. I am convinced that these days the world needs to cooperate, and sign covenants of peace, so that in the end we will reach a true peace.”

The vintners from both regions said they were looking forward to cooperation in technical knowledge and marketing, despite the EU Commission’s decision, which seeks to limit them, Walla reported. Dr. Provera said, “I think the EU’s decision to boycott Israeli products is a mistake and it would hurt both industry and the common people, including thousands of Palestinian families who actually make their living from working for Israelis in these plants.” He said “it’s a decision that will affect the common people, not the rich.”

Sondrio-and-Samaria-pact

JNi.Media

Israel Weighs Suing EU Over Settlement Product Labeling

Thursday, November 19th, 2015

(JNi.media) The Israeli government is considering filing a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization against the European Union, in response to the latter’s decision to mark Israeli products originating in the settlements at retail chains in Europe. A senior Israeli official told Ha’aretz that the push for a suit comes from Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan and Minister of Justice Ayelet Shaked. The move is opposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of the Economy.

Shaked and Erdan met recently to coordinate the promotion of their move in the cabinet. According to Ha’aretz, the two agreed on hiring a major international legal firm specializing in international trade to make a recommendation regarding the feasibility of a WTO suit and the chances of success.

According to Ha’aretz, senior officials in the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of the Economy say that chances for the success of such a move against the EU are very low and may cause more harm than good. They argue the move could cause a counter-mobilization of Arab countries against Israel at the WTO, and to end up with a decision making the products from the settlements illegal according to international law, which would mean they must be seized, not only labeled. A Foreign Ministry official said the move was one of those things that you “know how to get into, but not how to get out.”

International law professors Avi Bell of Bar Ilan University and Eugene Kontorovich of Northwestern University have written a position paper urging the filing of a lawsuit against the EU, and met with Shaked and Arden. Both have argued that one of the main principles of the WTO is no discrimination between member countries. Bell and Kontorovich say the EU decided to select products from the settlements for labeling, but isn’t labeling products from other conflict areas in the world where there is an occupation or a territorial dispute, such as the Moroccan Sahara products or products from the Turkish occupied area of Cyprus.

Meanwhile, it has been reported that cosmetics company Ahava has manages to get around the labeling for the time being, arguing that although its main factory is located at Kibbutz Mitzpe Shalem in Judea, most of the raw materials come from the parts of the Dead Sea that are within 1949 Israel; also, it argues that not all its products are manufactured in that main factory.

JNi.Media

International Law Expert Kontorovich: EU Breaking EU Laws Against Product Labeling

Friday, November 13th, 2015

(JNi.media) Eugene Kontorovich, a legal scholar whose specialties include international law, on Friday published an op-ed in the NY Times that could stir up a backlash over in Brussels. Titled, “Europe Mislabels Israel,” Kontorovich’s piece rebukes the EU Commission for breaking EU laws in its zeal to attack the Jewish State.

“Diplomats in Brussels and NGOs have made clear that more coercive measures will follow,” Kontorovich writes, suggesting the EU has initiated a “process of building a legal ghetto around Israel, within which a special set of rules applies.”

“The European Union allows Morocco — which has extensive trade ties with Europe, but has occupied Western Sahara since 1975, and populated it heavily with settlers — to export products from its occupied territory labeled ‘Made in Morocco,’” Kontorovich notes, pointing out that, “when challenged, the commission formally declared that labeling such goods as ‘made in’ Morocco is not misleading, and is consistent with European trade agreements.”

But wait, there’s so much more: European courts have already examined and rejected the EU Commission’s notion about extending “consumer protection” to shoppers deciding whether or not to buy Israeli products. “Just last year, the British Supreme Court ruled, in a case involving Ahava beauty products produced in the West Bank, that ‘there was no basis for saying that the average consumer would be misled’ by a ‘Made in Israel’ label.” Just as the EU decided in the case of Moroccon product from occupied Western Sahara, so did the UK court hold that the labeling “was not deceptive as a matter of both British and European Union law,” Kontorovich states.

“The problem is not that the European Union fails to live up to its standards in some cases, like that of Morocco,” he argues, “Rather, in these other cases the union explicitly denies the existence of these standards.”

This, in Kontorovich’s opinion, “is a legal violation in its own right. The European Union’s foundational treaties require regulatory ‘consistency.’ And discrimination against trading partners represents a core violation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other treaties of the World Trade Organization.”

How should the US respond to this obvious violation of the EU’s own trade laws, never mind the international trade agreements to which the EU is a signatory?

On Wednesday, Mark C. Toner, US State Department Deputy Spokesperson told reporters: “We understand the objective is to provide EU consumers correct information on the origin of products, as required by EU law. … The EU has made clear that measures are not a boycott, and the EU has also made very clear that they oppose boycotts against Israel. EU guidelines for products that are sold in EU countries are for the EU to determine.”

Not true, writes Kontorovich, who believes “the European Union labeling threatens to establish a precedent that would allow politicization of the system, undermining United States economic interests in broad and unpredictable ways. Thus it is not surprising that earlier this year, the United States passed a law opposing such European Union measures against Israel.”

Indeed, Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD) in late June introduced Amendment 20 into President Obama’s Fast Track bill, which reads:

A) IN GENERAL.—With respect to an agreement that is proposed to be entered into with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership countries and to which section 103(b) will apply, the principal negotiating objectives of the United States regarding commercial partnerships are the following:
(i) To discourage actions by potential trading partners that directly or indirectly prejudice or otherwise discourage commercial activity solely between the United States and Israel.

(ii) To discourage politically motivated actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel and to seek the elimination of politically motivated nontariff barriers on Israeli goods, services, or other commerce imposed on the State of Israel.

(iii) To seek the elimination of state-sponsored unsanctioned foreign boycotts against Israel or compliance with the Arab League Boycott of Israel by prospective trading partners.

(B) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term “actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel” means actions by states, non-member states of the United Nations, international organizations, or affiliated agencies of international organizations that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with Israel or persons doing business in Israel or in Israeli-controlled territories.

In reading both Kontorovich’s well founded opinion, and the Cardin amendment, it appears that the EU Commission’s ruling is actionable, both in the US and in Europe.

JNi.Media

Some Settlement Businesses See Potential Lemonade in EU Commission’s Lemons

Thursday, November 12th, 2015

(JNi.media) Tura, a family owned, boutique winery located in the village of Rehelim, in Samaria, produces 56 thousand bottles a year, 40% of which are shipped for export. According to winery owner Vered Ben Sa’adoun, the boycott movement against Jewish products from Judea and Samaria has achieved the opposite effect of the one intended: “For five months we were stuck without wine on the shelves thanks to [customers] who didn’t like the violence of the boycott movement,” she told Israel’s Channel 2 News Wednesday.

The EU Commission’s new regulations requiring member states to label products from the settlement stops short of actually making them illegal, and it has been argued that the regulations are not mandatory, meaning that individual states can decide to ignore them. But in all the discussion about the labeling requirement, it has been taken for granted that European consumers would shun products they know were made by Jews on the “wrong” side of the 1949 armistice line. Few have suggested that the European consumer’s sense of fair play, their admiration for the underdog and, yes, their general distaste for things pro-Islamic, might spell a boon for settlement-produced exports.

“The EU wants to boycott us, but I want to tell them that this boycott will not lead us [to any concessions],” said David Daniel, who owns beehives in the Jewish enclave in Hebron. “This attempt to harm us will not succeed. Our clients are very satisfied and happy with our products, and we are happy to market them to the world.”

PR firm Marketing Team Houston, actually recommends negative marketing to some of its clients, as a strategy to gain market share. “Be controversial,” they advise. “Nothing gets people buzzing like a little controversy. However, you’ll need to be prepared to manage the conversation – and the emotions that are sure to arise. … Choose a topic related to your brand that people are passionate about. When handled correctly, this negative marketing tactic can generate buzz and traffic.”

On February 7, 1962, President John F. Kennedy imposed a trade embargo on Cuba to sanction Fidel Castro’s communist government. As a result, until the ban has been lifted recently, in the US, authentic Cuban-made cigars were seen as “forbidden fruit” for Americans to wish to purchase at any cost. The boycott didn’t turn off anyone, it only made the product more desirable. Of course, it had to be a great product to start with—which is also the case with many settlement-grown and produced goods.

“We believe that we must fight back and call on all of Israel’s supporters around the world, Jews and non-Jews, to buy Israeli products,” said Jacob Berg, of the Psagot winery in Benjamin region. “The best way to fight this European boycott is let the numbers prove it, that a year from now we will sell 2 to 3 times more. If we cry and say it’s unfair, it’s racist, that won’t defeat them, because their goal is hurt the nation of Israel.”

Here are a few ideas we delineated from marketing websites and blogs that preach negative campaigns, most notably, hubspot.com:

1. Exclusionary Personas, the Other. The EU is siding with the Islamists you and I fear so much — show them the right way by purchasing settlements goods.

2. Leverage and Exclusivity. We may not be carried in all the stores, you may have to walk the extra mile and spend the extra five minutes to find our products — but it’s worth it, because they’re delicious. Remember the Cuban cigars? Make the settlement goods a Cuban cigar.

3. Come up with Negative Headlines. There’s a reason why you’re seeing more bad news than good — it’s the undeniable correlation between page views and negativity.

“The people who made this gadget are fearless Jews who guard all night and work all day. ”

“The man who baked this cake just shot a terrorist last night.”

“Taste our bananas and you, too, will want to settle here.”

4. Create a Bond Over a Shared Negative Experience. You think you got Muslims? You should see our Muslims. Here, have an apple cider.

5. Cast Villains. There’s no shortage of that — Arabs, faceless EU bureaucrats, far-left politicians. The Marxists in Brussels don’t want you to taste our grapes — they just ordered a container of them for themselves.

6. Self deprecation. If you don’t buy this Camembert, we’ll burn down this poor Palestinian’s olive grove. It acknowledges the anti-settlements myths and cuts across them with a joke.
Yesha Council, the umbrella body for the half-million plus Jews in Judea and Samaria, might consider this direction. They could call it chutzpah marketing.

JNi.Media

Israel Initiates Partial Suspension of Diplomatic Talks with EU

Thursday, November 12th, 2015

Israel has partially suspended diplomatic talks with the European Union — at least for now — over a decision by the EU to issue guidelines on labeling goods produced by Jews in Judea and Samaria.

Earlier in the day the European Commission, which is the political arm of the EU, issued the guidelines that have been in preparation since 2012, and are a clarification of the EU’s basic position:

“The European Union, in line with international law, does not recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, namely the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, and does not consider then to be part of Israel’s territory, irrespective of their legal status under domestic Israeli law.”

The guidelines are to “ensure the respect of the union positions and the commitments in conformity with international law on the nonrecognition by the union of Israel’s sovereignty over the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967.”

Each member state has the right to make its own decision on whether to place the “warning” consumer labels on products produced in Judea and Samaria by Jewish manufacturers, or not.

The bilateral dialogue to be abandoned by Israel relates primarily to areas of human rights and issues affecting Israel’s relationship with the Palestinian Authority, according to Foreign Ministry spokesperson Emanuel Nachshon.

Bilateral dialogue in areas such as education, agriculture, science and culture will continue, he said.

However, the ministry pointed out that “product labeling strengthens the radical elements advocating a boycott against Israel and denying Israel’s right to exist.

“It does not advance any political process between Israel and the Palestinians. The opposite is the case; it is bound to reinforce the Palestinian Authority’s refusal to conduct direct negotiations with Israel, negotiations that the EU claims to support.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded harshly to the move, telling journalists in an on-camera statement:

“The labelling of products of the Jewish state by the European Union brings back dark memories. Europe should be ashamed of itself. It took an immoral decision. Of the hundreds of territorial conflicts around the world, it chose to single out Israel and Israel alone, while it’s fighting with its back against the wall against the wave of terror.

“The European Union is not going to hurt the Israeli economy. It’s strong enough to weather this, but it’s the Palestinian workers in Israeli enterprises in Judea and Samaria that will be hurt. This will not advance peace; it will certainly not advance truth and justice. It’s wrong. Europe should be ashamed of itself.”

Some member states are not participating in the decision, however; the UK is one country that has chosen to ignore the ban.

There has also been a backlash in the Jewish State: News 0404 reported Wednesday on a supermarket in northern Israel that removed all the products from Europe, leaving only blue and white merchandise on the shelves. The supermarket owner, who is not religious, has chosen to remain unnamed and said the “blue-and-white” initiative was strictly a patriotic move and not intended for publicity.

Hana Levi Julian

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/israel-initiates-partial-suspension-of-diplomatic-talks-with-eu/2015/11/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: