web analytics
April 19, 2014 / 19 Nisan, 5774
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘Congressman Bob Turner’

A Leading Democrat’s Secret Advice On ‘The Jewish Vote’

Friday, September 21st, 2012

A senior member of President Harry Truman’s own administration secretly gave American Zionist lobbyists advice in 1946 on how to pressure Truman to support creating a Jewish state.

According to a documents I recently found at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem, when Zionist lobbyists needed advice on how to use the 1946 midterm elections as leverage on the White House, they turned to Truman’s own Solicitor General (the official who represents the administration before the Supreme Court), J. Howard McGrath.

A lawyer by profession, McGrath rose quickly in the ranks of the Democratic Party in his native Rhode Island. He was vice-chairman of the state party by 1928 and chairman two years later. After a four-year stint as U.S. district attorney in Providence, McGrath was elected governor in 1940. In 1944, he was one of the organizers of the Democratic National Convention and helped line up the votes to replace Vice President Harry Wallace with Senator Harry Truman. In the process, McGrath forged close ties with both Truman and President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Yet at the same time, he was straying far from the party line on Jewish issues. Starting in 1942, McGrath’s name began appearing among the endorsers listed on newspaper ads by the Bergson Group, a political action committee that criticized the Roosevelt administration on the issues of Jewish refugees and creating a Jewish state. He also served as a sponsor of Bergson’s 1943 Emergency Conference to Save the Jewish People of Europe.

Associating with Jewish critics of President Roosevelt was a risky move for a rising Democratic politician. Certainly McGrath would need to maintain good relations with the White House to advance his political career.

Why McGrath took an interest in Jewish affairs is not clear. Perhaps his Irish heritage and resentment of British control of Ireland created a sense of solidarity with the Jewish struggle to oust the British from Palestine. Other Irish-Americans who were active in the Bergson Group, such as attorney Paul O’Dwyer and Congressman Andrew Somers of Brooklyn, cited their resentment of the British as a factor. The feeling was mutual: in one internal British government memo I located, a Foreign Office staffer slurred Somers as “the less happy type of Irish-American Catholic demagogue.”

It is unlikely McGrath was motivated by pursuit of Jewish votes, since Jews comprised barely three percent of Rhode Island’s population. But McGrath had plenty to say on the subject when Benjamin Akzin, a senior lobbyist for the American Zionist Emergency Council (precursor of AIPAC), came seeking advice on “the Jewish vote.”

Akzin, who in later years would found and chair Hebrew University’s political science department and would serve as president of Haifa University, met with McGrath on March 14, 1946. He began by expressing his distress at “the lag between promise and performance” in the Truman administration’s Palestine policy. “Friendly statements” about Zionism were not matched with deeds.

“I came to ask what he could advise,” Akzin reported afterward to his colleagues, “and what he could do to help us in order to obtain some action.”

McGrath responded that “not being in the Cabinet, he could not raise the Palestine issue.” Moreover, “he has to stick to his own job, and any attempt by him to influence the policy of other Departments would be strongly resented.”

Then he turned around and proceeded to advise Akzin on how best to influence those other departments.

The Zionists’ “technical arguments” about rights and history would not succeed, McGrath said. They needed to adopt “a political approach” that would highlight the likelihood that Jewish voters would turn away from the Democrats in the upcoming midterm congressional elections. “He was very emphatic on this point.”

McGrath suggested organizing “a group of Democratic congressmen in threatened areas” to “take up the [Palestine] matter collectively with the Administration…After all, the real issue in the coming elections concerns the control of the House, rather than that of the Senate.” The administration might take heed if warned that the Democrats could lose control of the House over the Palestine issue.

Another “effective means of pressure on the Palestine issue, McGrath said, would be for the Zionists to contact “the Democratic candidates for governorships and for the Senate in the key states with a considerable Jewish population.” Each of those candidates “is going to have several talks with the President, with [national Democratic Party chairman Robert] Hannegan, and with the other key persons of the Administration.”

‘The UN Is No Longer Serious’: An Interview with Congressman Bob Turner

Thursday, June 21st, 2012

New York City Rep. Bob Turner (R-Queens and Brooklyn) is a candidate for the U.S. Senate Republican nomination in the June 26 primary.

The Jewish Press: In general, should the U.S. tilt toward Israel in disputes with its neighbors? What is the basis for your position?

Turner: The U.S. has an obligation to stand by its democratic allies, and we have no more stalwart ally than Israel. Israel has been the only serious player in the peace process. There is no moral equivalence between the enemies of Israel and the Israeli state, and every American needs to understand that.

Is Israel treated fairly in the UN and its affiliated agencies?

Generally, should the United States support Israel when it is attacked in the UN and other international organizations?

The United Nations is no longer a serious world entity. It is a chronically corrupt organization and a bastion of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism. I wish I could report otherwise. The idea of the United Nations was inspired, but it has atrophied into what it is today.

Do you believe, as does President Obama, that the 1967 borders, with “swaps,” should be the starting point for negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on final borders? Why?

The only starting point for negotiations is the full recognition of the State of Israel. Do Israel’s enemies forget that she was attacked in 1967?

Should Israel halt settlement building as a precondition for negotiations with the Palestinians? Why?

Rockets continue to land on Israeli territory and the Palestinian Authority does nothing about it. The PA openly supports terrorists by supporting the families of convicted terrorists in Israeli prisons. I would begin negotiations by withdrawing all U.S. funding for the PA only until those actions cease for a period of at least six months. If that condition was met and funding were to begin again, we should require a full accounting of every dollar spent.

Should Israel commit, in advance of negotiations, to the release of Palestinians whom it has jailed for violence committed against Israelis?

I would never agree to such an arrangement.

Should American policy favor Israel’s retention of the major Jewish population centers in West Bank settlements? Why?

That decision should be left to the Israeli government.

Do you believe American policy should be to support Israel retaining all of Jerusalem as its undivided capital? Why?

American policy should be to support the democratic decisions of the Israeli people. If that is their wish, we must respect and support it.

Should the United States move its embassy to Jerusalem?

Yes, I would support that. It would be a help if this administration in Washington would begin recognizing Jerusalem as a part of Israel.

Do you believe that parochial school students and their parents are entitled to the same assistance for the secular portion of their education as public school students and their parents?

Yes. In fact, I introduced The Teach Act in Congress to do just that. The Teach Act would give families a tax credit up to $5,000 for children attending religious or private elementary or secondary schools.

Would you support legislation that would require the reasonable accommodation of religious practices for tenants, prisoners and students (e.g., for mezuzahs, sukkahs, electronic keys, kosher food in prisons, tournaments scheduled for Saturday/religious holidays) as it is now required in employment (“reasonable accommodation without undue hardship”) for employees?

Yes.

What is your view about the continued imprisonment of Jonathan Pollard?

Jonathan Pollard has served 27 years. He has paid a disproportionate price for his transgressions when compared to other Americans convicted of treason – for non-allied and enemy nations! I have met with Mr. Pollard in federal prison and have advocated his release. I will continue to do so in the U.S. Senate.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/interviews-and-profiles/the-un-is-no-longer-serious-an-interview-with-congressman-bob-turner/2012/06/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: