web analytics
April 23, 2014 / 23 Nisan, 5774
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘MK Michael Ben Ari’

Poll: Many Who Stayed Home in 2009 Will Vote Left

Wednesday, January 16th, 2013

A new poll examining the anticipated voter turnouts among different segments of the population, predicts significant changes in the modes of voting this year, Ha’aretz reported Wednesday. This could mean the transfer of 3 to 4 votes from the right to the left, as compared with the regular polls which do not take into account the “unlikely voters” and their political leanings.

Now, before we dig into these claims, we have to consider both sources: Ha’aretz, which is directly involved in promoting left-wing politicians, and Proyect HaMidgam (the Sample Project), operated by Dr. Ariel Ayalon, which conducted the poll, and which is an Internet pollster. Those two factors weigh heavily on the numbers being provided, but they may still be correct about the trend.

Incidentally, Ha’aretz fails to mention the part about this being an online survey, as opposed to being conducted by the pesty and the jobless.

Based on the responses of a sample of 1200 Israelis who participated online, it turns out that right wing voters who took part in the last elections are showing “a lack of enthusiasm” about voting for the right wing block this time around. On the other hand, leftist voters are more charged and eager to vote for their parties’ lists.

The reluctance is most prevalent among those who voted Likud, Israel Beitenu, and Shas.

According to the survey, 62% of voters who skipped the polls in 2009 say they will vote this year (30% for sure, 32% positively considering it). Many of those have tied their decision to the 2011 summer of protests, saying that’s what shaped their decision to vote again. And 70% of those intend to vote left, only 30% right.

On the other hand, the same survey discovered that 5% of those who did vote in 2009 said explicitly that they intend not to vote this year. This represents some 160 thousand voters. Another 24%—about 750 thousand voters, said they’re undecided about voting this year.

And, according to the pollsters, the vast majority of those come from the right.

A few senior pollsters have commented on these results saying they show things are much more liquid than we’ve been anticipating. One result of this, they say, might be increased voting for the small, niche parties, which could either end up helping those parties cross the blocking percentage threshold (a party must win two full seats to enter the Knesset)—or it could cause the waste of a large percentage of the votes.

Israel’s election rules permit parties to sign agreements on sharing excess votes between them, meaning a party with more than, say, the number of votes needed for 5 seats, can contract to receive a second party’s extras, which might award the first party a sixth seat. But in order for that deal to be sanctioned, both parties must first cross the blocking percentage.

The poll was conducted on January 13 and 14, among 1200 participants, and was ordered by the Institute for Israel’s Future leadership, a think tank located in the souther town of Sderot.

As a right-wing voter who speaks to other right-wing voters in shul, in the supermarket, in public transportation—I must sadly state that anecdotally I can confirm this survey’s findings. Right wing voters in Israel have been swindled so many times by the elected representatives, that they’ve moved beyond cynicism, to a kind of apathy. We list our parties not according to what we expect them to do for us, but rather according to how fast they’ll betray us once we gave them our vote.

Shas must be the least trusted of all the right-wing parties (based on my personal, strictly anecdotal observation). Likud-Beitenu is next, with the average right-wing, National religious voter expecting it to form a left wing coalition. Jewish Home might score a little higher in our eyes, but watching its chairman, Naftali Bennett, flip-flopping, and refusing to answer some very important questions, especially on how he intends to deal with a Knesset list that combines culturally modern liberals such as himself and Uri Orbach, with others who advocate not renting to Arabs. And each new day brings new flips and flops, it appears.

And so, at least among people I talk to in shul, there’s a growing tendency to pick MKs Michael Ben Ari and Aryeh Eldad, about whom there’s a broad consensus that they will not vote for the 2-state solution, come hell or high water. And just like the nice pollster warned, this could end up with thousands of our votes ending up on the election committee’s floor.

Power for Israel’s Message of Responsibility in Arab Village

Tuesday, January 15th, 2013

In the spirit of their party slogan, “No privileges without duties,” on Tuesday morning the party Otzma L’Israel – Power for Israel – began their tour aka march of the village of Musmus, in the largely Arab Wadi Ara section of “green line” Israel. The marchers are demanding the enforcement of the law in all villages of Galilee and the Arab Triangle, Srugim reports.

The tour was accompanied by a heavy police entourage, which permitted only one bus full of activists to enter the village. The remaining activists have camped at the Megiddo junction and are being transported by police minibuses to the village.

Both party leaders, MKs Mordechai Ben Ari and Aryeh Eldad are leading the tour, walking the village streets with maps and the “No privileges without duties” banners.

MK Ben Ari told the accompanying press: “This has been our message throughout the campaign. It cannot be that entire cities and many villages, especially in the Negev and Galilee, life would go on as if they’re in a separate country. Anyone who wants privileges must pay municipal taxes, must obey the laws governing construction, and must be loyal to the State of Israel. Just as we have the Talya Sasson Outposts Law controlling settlements in Judea and Samaria, so we must have reporting of illegal construction in the Negev and Galilee.”

The Musmus village council announced that the police alone would bear responsibility for the consequences of the visit, no matter what those might be.

“Musmus will not behave in any lesser way than other Arab villages which kicked out the right-wing Zionist human garbage from their lands. There’s no Ahlan and no Sahlan (hello and welcome) for you, foreign, rootless orphans,” the announcement declared.

In Israel’s Election Campaign Telling the Truth Is against the Law

Tuesday, December 18th, 2012

A few weeks ago, our Power to Israel movement launched campaign signs on buses and billboards. We used a number of words in Arabic that we thought the Arabs in Israel were familiar with: “taxes,” “border,” “planning and construction laws,” “traffic laws,” and “loyalty,” and we stated that “without responsibilities you have no rights,” meaning that if Arabs don’t obey state laws, they shouldn’t claim any rights either.

A number of radical leftists approached the chairman of the Central Election Committee, Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, and showed him a photo of a bus ad that read, in large Arabic letters: “Fidelity,” and below that: “Without responsibilities you have no rights – Power to Israel.” They claimed that the publication was racist and offensive and demanded to disqualify the campaign. Justice Rubinstein approved their claim.

The offending campaign ad, with the word "Fidelity" written prominently in red Arabic letters.

The offending campaign ad, with the word “Fidelity” written prominently in red Arabic letters.

Beyond the legal questions (the Attorney General believes that the chairman of the Election Committee lacks the authority to intervene in outdoor advertising, and may only disqualify propaganda broadcasts on radio and television), Justice Rubinstein’s decision is highly problematic.

The Tax Authority data show that the rate of income tax payments for Israeli Arabs is far lower than their share in the population. The gap in Social Security data is even more extreme, even when compared with Jewish populations of similar socioeconomic segment. It is also well known that the rates of municipal tax collection in Arab communities are minuscule.

However, the representation of Arabs in the prison population is twice their proportion in the population at large and the proportion of Arabs involved in road fatalities is similarly high. The facts exist and are well know, but Justice Rubinstein decided that saying it in an election campaign, and in Arabic – amounts to racism

Power to Israel intends to enact in the next Knesset the “Law of the Hebrew language,” written by Ruth Gavison, the former chairperson of the Association for Civil Rights. The law will determine the status of Hebrew as the only official language in Israel. But until the law is enacted — Arabic is Israel’s other official language. It is difficult to understand the justice’s determination that the prominent use of this language indicates that we address Arabs and that it is racist. If the very use of an official language in Israel in an election campaign is racist – what remains of the freedom of speech the left is so proud of? Does it cover speech that contradicts the left’s position?

It may be the conceptual difference between strength and power. Israel had the strength to topple Hamas in operation Pillar of Defense, but it lacked the determination and the moral conviction to do it. Tens of thousands of illegal homes are being built by Israeli Arabs in the Negev, in Galilee and in Jerusalem. Israeli police have enough power to enforce the law equally, but the government has no inner strength and determination to instruct them to do so.

To that end, we launched Power to Israel, led by myself and by MK Dr. Michael Ben-Ari. Together we will empower the national camp.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/in-israels-election-campaign-telling-the-truth-is-against-the-law/2012/12/18/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: