Across Israel, Meir Panim responds to the growing needs of the country’s 1.75 million impoverished residents through various food and social service programs.
This past June we noted here that the “stunning news that the Claims Conference secured a four-year $1 billion infusion of funds from the German government to aid Holocaust survivors has been largely overshadowed by criticism that those leading the conference mishandled an internal investigation into the embezzlement of $57 million by some employees over a fifteen-year period.”
As we said, “This is not to suggest that the theft of $57 million is an insignificant thing or that those who have been key to the conference’s achievements should be exempt from criticism or inquiry. It is to lament, though, that public discourse seems more and more driven by those with narrow perspectives and a penchant for ‘gotcha’ journalism.”
We went on to note that the new $1 billion funding had followed the securing over the years of the “staggering total of $70 billion” and questioned why there was the exclusive focus in some parts of the media on the $57 million, “particularly when several conference employees went to jail for embezzlement following a federal investigation materially aided by the assistance of the very conference leadership now being attacked.”
In an opinion piece last week in The Jerusalem Post, Julius Berman, the chairman of the Claims Conference (its full name is the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany) charged, among other things, “that the Claims Conference is being hounded by a few individuals who have been ‘careless with the truth’ – to put it mildly – during recent months.”
Mr. Berman further asserted that “These individuals have fed the media in general, and The Jerusalem Post in particular, a web of lies and distortions” and noted that “US Attorney Preet Bharara repeatedly and publicly thanked the Claims Conference for bringing the matter to the FBI’s attention…for their outstanding ongoing assistance and for its extraordinary continued cooperation in this investigation.”
He went on to say that “Unfortunately few, if any, bothered to ask for first-hand evidence, preferring instead to ride a wave of sensationalism….”
In a largely inexplicable editorial mea culpa, the Post said, in pertinent part:
We reject Berman’s claim that the Post was “careless with the truth.” We regret any harm done to his good name or to that of his organization….
If we omitted salient facts, we accept responsibility for this oversight. One such fact is that not one Holocaust victim was deprived of any funds.
The role of the Claims Conference in uncovering and investigating the misappropriation of funds was for the most part unacknowledged.
All parties that meticulously investigated fraudulent acts in the organization, including the FBI and the United States Attorney’s Office, have determined that the Claims Conference acted appropriately….
Additionally, the German government – the only party to have lost out as a result of the fraud – has given the Claims Conference a consistent vote of confidence. It continued working closely with the Claims Conference for the benefit of survivors, even while the investigation was ongoing. During negotiations with the Claims Conference last May, the German government agreed to provide an extra $1 billion over four years….
The Post prides itself on independent investigation and fair coverage. As much as we try in good faith, we do not always get the balance completely right, and when we err we are prepared to admit our mistakes and apologize as we do for any wrongdoing in our coverage of the Claims Conference.
So after saying they “reject the claim that the Post was ‘careless with the truth,’ ” the Post’s editorial writers proceed to acknowledge that the paper in fact “omitted salient points,” that it takes “responsibility for this oversight,” and that it permitted important aspects of the case to go “for the most part unacknowledged.”
At any rate, we trust this mealy-mouthed about-face will allow the Claims Conference to go about its important work free from at least some artificial roadblocks.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
The answer is an emphatic no.
The meaning of “God’s watch” here is not entirely clear.
Don’t Israelis and Arab Palestinians deserve more than this? Is it not time to stop the insanity?
At age 104, my mother was still concerned about her relationship with Hashem.
Obama’s incompetence, the way his naive worldview and credulity have made a fool of him, are equally frightening
“The only difference between this world and the time of Meshiach is our bondage to the gentile kingdoms.”
You’ve discovered our little secret!
Klein’s challenger has demonstrated a propensity to unleash poisonous vitriol, even to other Zionists
President Obama’s foreign policy is based on fantasy.
Welcome the book of Leviticus!
If the nationalist Knesset members don’t provide the answer, the Arab MKs will do so in their place.
International Agunah Day falls annually on Ta’anis Esther, this year on March 13.
Yeshiva University Museum recently hosted an exhibit titled “Threshold to the Sacred.”
Even a foxhole Yid has to admit that antisemitism is on the upswing.
One can almost imagine a shocked Mr. Kerry thinking to himself, “How could he?” Yet not only did Mr. Putin do what he did, China, one of the three major international players along with the U.S. and Russia, agreed with him, not with Mr. Kerry.
We are not unmindful that generally appropriate governmental initiatives may have some inappropriate aspects in execution.
Al Qaeda, despite President Obama’s claims to the contrary, is newly resurgent and no doubt salivating at the prospect of a severely diminished U.S. military capacity.
Last month, after the Israeli government published plans for new construction, the State Department promptly repeated its longstanding refrain that the settlements were “illegitimate” and that “It is never helpful to have steps taken that are not conducive to our efforts to move forward on peace.”
While the thrust of the proposed law is easily understandable, there is a problem as well. The current draft requires claimants to prove malicious intent on the part of the present holder of the property, which some legal authorities say would be extremely difficult.
Recent stories in the Israeli media, citing “unnamed sources,” indicate that Mr. Kerry failed to get backing from President Obama to confront Israel over its rejection of his peace proposals
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/claims-conference-controversy-the-jerusalem-post-apologizes-almost/2013/10/16/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
No related posts.