web analytics
May 22, 2015 / 4 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Letters To The Editor


Letters-logo

I later e-mailed the husband of one of the new maharats, whom I know personally, and asked him how the school could permit Kol Isha. This man, an Orthodox rabbi, replied that the prohibition of Kol Isha does not apply to someone saying a davar she’bikedushah (i.e. Shema, Kedushah, etc.).

The actual wording of the Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 75:3 states otherwise. It says that “one should avoid listening to a woman sing when saying Shema.”

Only later did I realize that since the women were singing the words to a berachah (“Shehecheyanu”), that was the davar she’bikedushah he meant. In other words, listening to a woman sing from the words of Tehillim or anything composed by Chazal, according to Yeshivat Maharat, is permissible.

This attempt to give a halachic stamp of approval to Kol Isha by redefining Chazal’s meaning and usage of the term davar she’bikedushah is disingenuous and tramples on divrei Chazal.

Yeshivat Maharat has crossed a red line and can no longer be considered Orthodox, no matter what prefix is added to the word “orthodoxy” – “open orthodoxy,” “morethodoxy” or some other variant – to make others believe the school is still within the Orthodox camp. In this case, more is less.

Kol hamosif goraya (Sanhedrin 29a).

Rabbi Mordechai Bulua
(Via E-Mail)

Appalled At Administrators’ Attitude

I have been a Jewish educator for 36 years, during which time I’ve taught in public schools, non-Jewish private schools, Jewish day schools and Talmud Torah afternoon schools.

My heart goes out to every parent who has a child with ADD/ADHD, and as I read Michelle Gross’s “Rabbis Denied My Daughter a Jewish Education” (op-ed, Aug. 16) I was increasingly appalled at the way the yeshivot and administrative rabbis handled her case (and who knows how many other cases involving children whose parents don’t write articles).

The “educational professionals” Ms. Gross had to deal with should be ashamed of themselves. ADD/ADHD in nothing new and there is a tremendous amount of written material available on the subject. Have these administrators not read any of that material, or attended any of the numerous professional development classes given on ADD/ADHD?

Every Jewish child is so important and we are losing so many thanks to intermarriage and young people going off the derech. We can’t afford to throw away Jewish children who want a Jewish education just because they have a disability in learning, concentration and focusing.

I once heard a vort that stuck with me as an educator. What is the reason we put both the whole luchot and the broken luchot in the aron of the Mishkan? What benefit was there in keeping the broken ones? The benefit was that they reminded us we are responsible for the broken Jews in the world – the handicapped, the poor, the hungry and even the learning disabled and those children who suffer from ADD/ADHD.

The rabbis and administrators who run these yeshivot with expensive tuitions should get their act together and stop discarding our children. Maybe they could cut back on expenses elsewhere and open special programs in their schools to draw more kids with learning disabilities. I am sure there are plenty of unemployed teachers who would be happy to teach these kids.

Elul is here and Rosh Hashanah is coming. The rabbis/administrators should do a little soul searching and figure out how to help kids with disabilities, because what response will they have when Hashem asks them, “What did you do for those special children who are miracles from Me just like every other child?”

Rochell Weisfogel
Columbus, OH

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

3 Responses to “Letters To The Editor”

  1. hophmi says:

    “The prohibition of a man listening to the singing voice of a woman is clearly spelled out in the Shulchan Aruch”

    Wow, for someone from the haredi frum community to accuse Yeshivat Marahat of kol hamosif goraya – that’s rich. 

    This whole letter takes a halachically complex issue and reduces it to soundbytes.  The same paragraph more or less prohibits any interaction between men and women in public.  And, newsflash, in Modern Orthodoxy, at least, nobody seemed to have a big problem with women singing in public until fairly recently.
    The irony is that it’s people like Mordechai Bulua who are kol hamosif goraya, not Yeshivat Marahat.  The prohibition in the Gemara was interpreted by many to be a prohibition on listening to women while saying the Shema or davening, not a blanket prohibition on listening to women speak or sing, as it has become in some the haredi community. 
    Bulua is on a crusade of Motzei Shem Rah against Yeshivats Chovevei and Marahat; http://www.bill613.com/opinion/opinion-shaar-hashomayim-congregation/

  2. hophmi says:

    “The prohibition of a man listening to the singing voice of a woman is clearly spelled out in the Shulchan Aruch”

    Wow, for someone from the haredi frum community to accuse Yeshivat Marahat of kol hamosif goraya – that’s rich. 

    This whole letter takes a halachically complex issue and reduces it to soundbytes.  The same paragraph more or less prohibits any interaction between men and women in public.  And, newsflash, in Modern Orthodoxy, at least, nobody seemed to have a big problem with women singing in public until fairly recently.
    The irony is that it’s people like Mordechai Bulua who are kol hamosif goraya, not Yeshivat Marahat.  The prohibition in the Gemara was interpreted by many to be a prohibition on listening to women while saying the Shema or davening, not a blanket prohibition on listening to women speak or sing, as it has become in some the haredi community. 
    Bulua is on a crusade of Motzei Shem Rah against Yeshivats Chovevei and Marahat; http://www.bill613.com/opinion/opinion-shaar-hashomayim-congregation/

  3. Rabbi Mordechai Bulua says:

    Hophni,
    It’s amazing how you put words in my mouth. I never wrote that public interactions between men and women are prohibited. You yourself admit that even in modern Orthodoxy, listening to women sing is prohibited. You must be living on another planet if you believe that there is a blanket prohibition in the haredi community to listen to a woman SPEAK! That’s ridiculous. Name me even ONE orthodox posek who says as you do; that the prohibition applies only when a man is davening or saying Shema. The Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer 21:1 does not qualify the prohibition for any reason.  I rest my case.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Tzipi Hotovely, new Deputy Foreign Minister.
Foreign Minister Hotovely: Tell the World ‘God Gave Israel to the Jews’
Latest Indepth Stories
Harris-052215

We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.

Shalev and Rabbi Levinger

During my spiritual journey I discovered G-d spoke to man only once, to the Jewish people at Sinai

MK Moshe-Feiglin

20 years after the great Ethiopian aliyah, we must treat them like everyone else; no better or worse

Sprecher-052215

Connecting Bamidbar&Shavuot is simple-A world without Torah is midbar; with Torah a blessed paradise

Many Black protesters compared Baltimore’s unrest to the Palestinian penchant of terrorism & rioting

She credited success to “mini” decisions-Small choices building on each other leading to big changes

Shavuot 1915, 200000 Jews were expelled; amongst the largest single expulsions since Roman times

Realizing there was no US military threat, Iran resumed, expanded & accelerated its nuclear program

“Enlightened Jews” who refuse to show chareidim the tolerance they insist we give to Arabs sicken me

Somewhat surprisingly, the Vatican’s unwelcome gesture was diametrically at odds with what President Obama signaled in an interview with the news outlet Al Arabiya.

The recent solid victory of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party produced something very different.

The reaction is so strong that nine times out of ten, parents engage in some form of coping mechanism before arriving at a level of acceptance of a special-needs diagnosis.

“…his neshamah reached out to us to have the zechus of Torah learning to take with him on his final journey.”

The gap isn’t between Israeli and American Jews-it’s between American Jews and the rest of the world

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-266/2013/08/28/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: