web analytics
July 29, 2014 / 2 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



Whither Israel: After Lebanon And Gaza? Finally, Time To Reject A Suicidal “Peace Process” (Part Three of Four)


Beres-Louis-Rene

Defenseless under the night,

Our world in stupor lies.

W. H. Auden

Part Three

The rights of both Jews and Christians were openly trampled on by the Muslim conquerors of Jerusalem. Churches were made into mosques. Slaughterhouses were deliberately established near Jewish places of worship. Mosques were built next to churches and synagogues so that their minarets could literally “over-tower” them.

In the 2,554 years between 587 B.C.E. and 1967 C.E. Jerusalem was conquered more than 20 times, and as part of many empires, was ruled from different and distant capital cities. Only for the Jews (for more than 650 years), for the Crusaders (for 188 years) and for the State of Israel (since 1949) − has Jerusalem served as a capital city.

The official map of “Palestine” issued by the “moderate” Palestine Authority (PA) shows the State of Palestine as comprising all of the West Bank (Judea/Samaria), all of Gaza, all of the State of Israel and a slice of the Kingdom of Jordan. Additionally, it excludes any reference to a Jewish population, and lists holy sites of Christians and Muslims only. Initially, an official cartographer, Khalil Tufakji, was commissioned by the PA to design and to locate a proposed Capitol Building, which he drew to be located on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, on top of an ancient Jewish cemetery.

From the Oslo Accords very beginnings, on September 1, 1993, Yasir Arafat reaffirmed that the “peace” agreements are an intrinsic part of the PLO’s 1974 phased plan for Israel’s destruction: “The agreement will be a basis for an independent Palestinian state in accordance with the Palestinian National Council resolution issued in 1974. The PNC resolution issued in 1974 called for the establishment of a national authority on any part of Palestinian soil from which Israel withdraws or which is liberated…” Later, on May 29, 1994, Rashid Abu Shbak, a senior PA security official, remarked: “The light which has shone over Gaza and Jericho will also reach the Negev and the Galilee.”

Speaking of maps, it will be instructive to consider the following: The Arab world is comprised of 22 states of nearly five million square miles and 144,000,0000 people. The Islamic world contains 44 states with over one-billion people. The Islamic states comprise an area 672 times the size of Israel. Israel, with a population of about 5-million Jews, is − together with Judea/Samaria and Gaza − less than half-the-size of San Bernardino County in California. The Sinai Desert alone, which Israel transferred to Egypt in the 1979 Treaty for no tangible quid pro quo, is three times larger than the entire State of Israel.

What about Palestinian compliance with the so-called Peace Process? Incontestably the PA/PLO − and now especially Hamas − are guilty of multiple material breaches of the basic Oslo Accords. For example:

1) PA/Hamas still fails to confiscate arms and to disarm militias. The Palestinian police (still drawing upon terrorists for recruitment) are legally obligated to disarm all militias acting in areas under its jurisdiction, to confiscate all weapons other than pistols, and to license pistols in accordance with regulations to be established by the two sides (Annex I, Art. II, 1 and art. XI). In fact, all of the militias which were operating when the PA assumed control over Gaza and Jericho − Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Fatah − remain armed. In total violation of the Oslo Accords and the successor Road Map, the current Palestinian Authority/Hamas is now establishing a thriving military industry in Gaza, complete with extensive cross-border smuggling from Egypt. Even before Prime Minister Sharon’s ill-fated “disengagement” from Gaza, the PA had established multiple factories for manufacturing various kinds of ammunition. Following the recent war against Hizbullah in Lebanon, the IDF must still plan for intermittent operations in Gaza. These operations are needed to compensate for the PA’s own incessant, juridical Oslo failures.

2) The PA/Hamas still steadfastly refuses to present Israel with lists of Palestinian policemen. To enable Israel to prevent terrorists from joining the Palestinian police force (an expectation that Israel has consistently been unable to satisfy), the PA/Hamas is obligated to submit the list of all potential recruits for Israel’s approval (Annex I, Art. IV). This requirement is especially critical regarding those Palestinians who were initially recruited from the territories, where Hamas and Islamic Jihad influence has always been strong. Notwithstanding, the PA/Hamas has not submitted any of the names from when it recruited forces for Gaza and Jericho. The PA/Hamas repeated its commitment concerning recruitment for the additional areas governed by the Interim Agreement, but continued and enlarged its policy of systematic noncompliance.

3) The PA/Hamas has long exceeded the permissible number of policemen. The early Gaza-Jericho Accords of May 1994 limited the number of Palestinian policemen to 9000 (Annex I, Art. III, 3), but during the period when the PA controlled these two areas, they enrolled approximately 20,000 people in their so-called security forces. The Interim Agreement expanded the PA’s jurisdiction to additional parts of Judea/Samaria and increased the permissible number of policemen to 24,000 in areas A and B − including Gaza (Annex I, Art. IV, 3). Early on, however, the PA police signed on more than 30,000 men, and perhaps as many as 40,000 or even 50,000. This would suggest that the PA police have always been recruited, not as a police agency, but as an army.

4) The PA/Hamas still refuses to extradite suspected terrorists. The PA/Hamas is obligated to turn over to Israel for trial, all individuals for whom Israel provides an arrest warrant and proof of terrorist activity (Annex IV, II, 7). Yet, to date, Israel has requested several hundred suspects in mass murder, murder or attempted murder of Israelis, and not one has been handed over to Israeli authorities. Leading PA/Hamas officials have made it perfectly clear that they have absolutely no intention of honoring the extradition provisions of the Oslo Accords, and they will continue their illegal intransigence under the Road Map. (Reciprocally, it should be pointed out that Israel has no right under international law to free terrorists – an egregious practice that has been accepted by several successive Israeli governments, always with deeply regrettable human outcomes).

5) The PA and its successor Hamas “government” have failed entirely to use their respective court systems for the punishment of terrorists. The Palestinian police are obligated to “arrest and prosecute individuals who are suspected of perpetrating acts of terror and violence” (Annex I, Art. II, 1). Yet, for years, not one of the top leaders of the military wings of Hamas or Islamic Jihad has been sentenced − a policy of flagrant Palestinian law-violation that continues without apology and assuredly without any sanctions from the so-called “international community.”

6) The PA/Hamas leadership has become more complicit in its incitement to terror. The leadership of the PLO and PA/Hamas is obligated to refrain from incitement to terrorism (Art. XXII). Yet, there have been many statements by Hamas government officials stridently calling for Jihad and praising those who have brought unspeakable death to Israeli men, women and children.

The list of PA/PLO/Hamas violations of Oslo (foundation of current Road Map) goes on and on. There is the incontestable failure to prevent incitement (codified at Annex 1, Art. II, 35); harassment of suspected former collaborators (codified at Art. XVI); failure to provide information on Israeli MIAs (codified at Art. XXVIII of the Interim Agreement and at Art.XIX of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement); the failure to change the PLO Covenant (codified at Art. XXXII), a failure that means that the PLO/PA (let alone Hamas) has still not renounced its intent to annihilate the Jewish State; the abuse of human rights and the rule of law (codified at Art. XIX); the failure to control PLO/Hamas police activity in Eastern Jerusalem (codified at Annex I of both agreements − the Gaza-Jericho Accord and the Interim Agrement − which carefully delineate the areas in which the Palestinian security forces may operate).

(To be continued)

Copyright The Jewish Press, September 22, 2006. All rights reserved.

LOUIS RENE BERES (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres, strategic and military affairs columnist for The Jewish Press, is professor of Political Science at Purdue University. Educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), he lectures and publishes widely on international relations and international law and is the author of ten major books in the field. In Israel, Professor Beres was chair of Project Daniel.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Whither Israel: After Lebanon And Gaza? Finally, Time To Reject A Suicidal “Peace Process” (Part Three of Four)”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Bibi: ‘Death From Above, Death From Below’ Will Not Continue
Latest Indepth Stories
Young children 'recruited' by the Al Qaeda-inspired Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) terrorist group for a Shari'a jihadist army in Iraq and Syria.

ISIS poses a great threat to the entire civilized world in general and liberal democracies in particular.

kerry clown

Kerry is preoccupied with pressuring Israel, notwithstanding the transformation of the Arab Spring .

journalism

With no shortage of leftist media that seek to distort the news, what should our Torah response be?

Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett

Because let’s face it: Hamas obviously can’t defeat the IDF in the field, soldier against soldier

As Peres retires, Israel fights sour legacy: Insistence on setting policy in line with hopes, rather than with reality.

Our capital was not arbitrarily chosen, as capitals of some other nations were.

UNHRC High Commissioner Navi Pillay accuses the IDF of possible war crimes in Gaza again, cutting slack to Hamas.

There is much I can write you about what is going here, but I am wondering what I should not write. I will start by imagining that I am you, sitting at home in the Los Angeles area and flipping back and forth between the weather, traffic reports, the Ukraine, Mexican illegals and Gaza. No […]

Should Jews in Europe take more responsibility in self-defense of community and property?

It is time for a total military siege on Gaza; Nothing should enter the Gaza Strip.

Germany’s The Jewish Faith newspaper ominously noted, “We Jews are in for a war after the war.”

The truth is we seldom explore with kids what prayer is supposed to be about.

Almost as one, Jews around the world are acknowledging the day-to-day peril facing ordinary Jews in Israel and the extraordinary service of the IDF in protecting them.

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres
Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Louis Rene Beres

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

An undifferentiated or across-the-board commitment to nuclear ambiguity could prove harmful to Israel’s’s overall security.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/whither-israel-after-lebanon-and-gaza-finally-time-to-reject-a-suicidal-peace-process-a-column-in-four-parts-3/2006/09/20/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: