In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.
To Err Is Human
Please allow me to use this space to apologize to readers for my faux pas in my Purim front-page essay (“Purim: Agony and Ecstasy,” March 10). The Hebrew year as appears in the opening feature of the essay should have read 5583 rather than 5183 (making it 1823 instead of 1423); likewise, later on in the story the year 5253 should have read 5653 (making it 1893 instead of 1493). A typo led to a miscalculation down the line that went unnoticed.
In the spirit of Purim and v’nahapochu – even though I hadn’t yet uncorked my favorite Chardonnay at the time – I hope to be forgiven.
Holding Rogers Accountable
Kudos to Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver for once again standing up for our community and demanding that architect Lord Richard Rogers be barred from the redesign of the Jacob Javits Center if Rogers’s architectural firm was indeed aiding the Arab boycott of Israel (“The Archbishop of Canterbury, ‘Paradise Now,’ and Lord Rogers,” editorial, March 10). Rogers has now disavowed any pro-boycott activity, but he never would have had to answer for offering a space to anti-Israel advocates without Speaker Silver’s insistence.
At a time when the Bush Administration was prepared to turn over our ports to a Dubai company that refuses to move goods from Israeli companies, the speaker’s renewed focus on the vast economic tentacles of the boycott movement is particularly welcome. With endless mergers and corporate consolidations, local and state governments must make sure that we are not doing business with those who participate in an illegal and immoral boycott of Israel.
Anti-boycott laws have been on the books for decades, but the internationalization of commerce demands increased oversight on compliance by public contractors.
Mum On Imam
The widespread apologias and free speech defenses offered up on behalf of Imam Umar Abdul-Jalil of New York City’s Department of Corrections shows just how much on the money your March 10 editorial was – and, indeed, how right you’ve been in your frequent comments on the differing standards applied to the treatment of religious groups. In today’s politically correct climate, Islam and Muslims are to be handled with the softest of kid gloves, while evangelical Christians, traditional Roman Catholics and, of course, Jews (particularly Orthodox Jews) are fair game for criticism and subject to all manner of denigration.
The imam – he’s actually the senior clergyman in the Corrections Department – in addition to making the outrageous statements that the White House is run by terrorists and that Muslims were tortured in Manhattan prisons after the World Trade Center attack, urged Muslims in America not to allow “the Zionists of the media to dictate what Islam is to us.”
Just imagine the reaction from our liberal politicians and journalists if the imam had included in his diatribe negative comments about homosexuals or feminists – or, on the flip side, imagine the response from his fellow Muslims if he’d condemned the Muslim militias that are targeting the hapless blacks of Darfur.
Will the Israeli electorate be mislead again by defeatist politicians? While tired Israeli officials tirelessly invoke the specter of Arab demography to justify their incremental surrender of the Promised Land to unrepentant terrorists, they conspicuously ignore their duties to boost and ensure a Jewish majority.
Specifically, these individuals refuse to outlaw wholesale abortions, which tragically destroy approximately 50,000 precious Jewish fetuses annually. Neither will they banish missionaries who have deceptively ensnared thousands of innocent and uninformed Jews. Nor have they been able to significantly decrease the vehicular slaughter on Israeli roads which has cumulatively caused more deaths than all the wars and terror attacks combined. Moreover, the absence of effective programs to reduce smoking and drug traffic among Israel’s youth and the rise of violent crime are further examples of serious policy omissions.
Undoubtedly, if the next government swiftly enacts programs to help remedy the above-mentioned problems, Israel’s current 76 percent Jewish majority will increase and many more Diaspora Jews will be attracted to make aliyah.
As Theodor Herzl proclaimed, “If you will it, it is no dream.” Israelis must vote accordingly.
Talking To Oneself
I read Jo Finkel’s March 3 “In Your Corner” column and must tell you I liked it very much. I too talk like that to myself and can tell you that I’ve succeeded so far. I guess that’s the way God talks to us, through our achievements here on earth, and of course He only wants the best for us all.
I am not a Jew but do respect and read a lot about your culture.
The true colors of the movement falsely labeled “Conservative” Judaism (there’s nothing conservative about it – it’s simply a more cautious, less honest version of Reform) were on full display last week when its so-called halacha committee delayed a vote on whether to lift the movement’s ban on gay clergy and same-sex marriage ceremonies.
According to news reports, the committee members are grappling with how to deal with the biblical passage that says, “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; it is an abomination.”
Indeed. The Torah couldn’t be more straightforward. It’ll be most interesting to see how the bright minds of the movement rationalize away the Torah’s clear position on homosexuality – not just the stark prohibition of the Bible, but the interpretations of that prohibition by rabbinical scholars down through the ages.
This isn’t a matter of reinterpreting, purely for the sake of convenience so that their congregants can drive to synagogue on Saturday, the traditional rabbinic understanding of Shabbos prohibitions. This cuts much deeper to the very heart of the Torah’s blueprint for human behavior, for personal sanctity, for the fulfillment of God’s first commandment to Adam and Eve – “Be fruitful and multiply.”
When an American has an unsatisfactory experience in Israel, it is not unusual to find the complaint in American-Jewish newspapers. My wife and I recently completed a wonderful experience in Israel in the purchase and refurbishing of a condominium in Mevasseret Tzion, a suburb just to the west of Jerusalem. It’s a brief story worth reporting.
Because we do not speak Hebrew, we had the good sense and good fortune to hire as our home consultant and manager one Vered Mor, a fluent bilingual real estate manager, consultant, designer and jill-of-all trades.
Mrs. Mor’s expertise, dedication to our best interests, and unceasing hard work turned the usual, almost unavoidable nightmare of purchasing and making a second home in a foreign land into a dream come true.
Find a good lawyer and real estate agent, of course. But, dear reader, if it’s a home in Israel that’s on your agenda, find yourself a Vered Mor first.
I am the one who inadvertently ignited the firestorm in The Jewish Press about evolution; it was not even the main point of my original letter but for some inexplicable reason that is what readers seized upon (Letters, Nov. 25).
At first I was flattered at all the attention and bemused that so many otherwise intelligent people could brush aside mountains of evidence and deny one of the most robust and fructifying theories of science.
The theory of evolution needs no defense in The Jewish Press; it is the cornerstone of modern biology. As all roads lead to Rome, all biological roads lead to evolution. The Jewish Press is not the proper venue to challenge scientific ideas; that is done in the peer-reviewed scientific literature and before one’s colleagues at scientific meetings. None of the readers who’ve assailed evolution in The Jewish Press have published or presented in this way.
The dates and locations of meetings of societies such as the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, the American Institute of Biological Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science are a Google search away for critics of evolution – if the Internet is not yet banned in their homes. And that is what should be aired in The Jewish Press.
Bemusement soon gave way to sadness and anger when I did a Google search and quickly found that I was in very good company. Rabbi Natan Slifkin in Israel had written several books showing with impeccable Torah sources that there is room in Torah for acceptance of modern science, and he was hung out to dry by a Who’s Who of haredi Torah authority in both America and Israel.
Apparently many (but by no means all) so-called gedolim are so small-minded and insecure that any idea that seems to pose the slightest challenge to their view of the world is to be suppressed, and anybody holding such views, no matter how learned, is to be branded an apikoros (heretic) and subjected to the most reprehensible vilification and character assassination. Gentiles in the academic world behave better than that toward colleagues with whom they disagree.
Many of those who signed on to the ban never read the books – and could not because they do not understand English! Nevertheless, they see fit to hold Torah up to the ridicule of the civilized world, which will now see us in the same vein as the Flat Earth Society, and to alienate inquisitive bright young Jews from Torah.
These men have drawn a line in the sand and dared us to cross. For the sake of Torah, we must shed our inferiority complex and cross it. Government in America derives its authority from the consent of the governed, and I for one do not consent to be governed by the signatories to or endorsers of the Slifkin ban and their censoring, book-banning crew – at least one of whom actually had the evolution chapters torn out of biology textbooks in his yeshiva in Brooklyn.
We have been too deferential to them for too long. We will not allow such people to enclose our minds in ghetto walls and send us back to the Dark Ages. With the guidance of American-born, English-speaking, college-educated Torah scholars, we will forge ahead, carrying Torah proudly into a world of intellectual freedom in which we participate fully.
About the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
How far the PA will go to present the lie as the truth and the truth as a lie? Its claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is old hat. But now the “resurrection” also refers to “the Palestinian state.”
The progressive consolidation imagines that organization can contain the messier side of man.
The Russian Yakhont missiles already delivered to Syria threaten Israel Navy ships carrying out vital missions in the Mediterranean.
America could be said to be building a united front against Iran, but at what price?
The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.
Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.
Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.
The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.
Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.
The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.
We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”
Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.
Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.
Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.
Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.
Let’s think what OUR interest is, and act according to it.
This past Friday, I went shopping at a local supermarket and noticed a piece of paper on the floor with what looked like Hebrew lettering. On closer examination, I was shocked to see that this small pamphlet with some form off advertising contained the full text of “Krias Shma al Hamitta,” (the Shma Israel recited [...]
Dear Editor, I read with interest Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu’s February 24, 2013 article entitled, Women of the Wall Rabbi Calls Knesset Achashverosh. In 2003, the Israeli Supreme Court issued a decision that allows Women of the Wall to pray at the Kotel once a month on Rosh Hodesh. That is why Women of the Wall only [...]
Today is my brother’s second yartzheit and a Torah was dedicated in his memory.
I know that some people in heterosexual families see themselves as underdog victims harassed by threatening gays.
In Praise Of Marc Shapiro (I) I thoroughly enjoyed Elliot Resnick’s interview with Professor Marc Shapiro (“Things Once Taken For Granted Are Now Considered Unacceptable,” April 27). It’s a real credit to The Jewish Press that the article ran at all, which is a sad commentary on the state of Orthodoxy today and the fearful, [...]
Correct Distinctions Kenneth Levin’s April 20 front-page essay (“The Empty Rage of Jewish ‘Progressives‘“) makes precisely the correct distinctions between Alvin Rosenfeld’s monograph and the responses of his detractors. If they don’t want to be lumped together with self-styled progressives who delegitimize Israel, they should watch the company they keep. Richard Sherwin(Via E-Mail) No Debate Lately there [...]
Independence Day The celebration of Yom Ha’atzmaut is a declaration that the Nazis failed to obliterate four millennia of Jewish life. But while we’ve earned the right to rejoice, let there be no illusions. Once again, the very nations that stood idly by while millions of innocent Jews were slaughtered are jeopardizing Israel’s survival. The [...]
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-128/2006/03/15/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: