web analytics
March 2, 2015 / 11 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Why Do We Daven?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Gemara in Berachos 26b brings a dispute regarding the origin of our obligation to daven.

Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina says that the avos where misaken the tefillos. The Gemara quotes a braisa that supports this view and cites pesukim from which we derive that Avraham was mesaken Shacharis, Yitzchak was mesaken Minchah, and Yaakov was mesaken Ma’ariv. Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi disagrees, saying that tefillah was instituted to correspond to the korbanos.

There were two korbanos that were brought daily, the tamid shel shacharis and the tamid shel bein ha’arbayim. Shacharis and Minchah correspond to these two korbanos while Ma’ariv corresponds to the burning of the eimurim from the korbanos – which was performed at night. The tefillos of Musaf were instituted to correspond to the korban musaf that was brought on specific days. The braisa adds that the times to daven these tefillos correspond to the times that the korbanos were brought.

The Rambam (Hilchos Tefillah 1:5) seemingly brings down the opinion of Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi. The Rambam writes that the tefillos were mesaken to correspond to the korbanos. However, in Hilchos Melachim (9:1), the Rambam writes that Avraham davened Shacharis, Yitzchak davened Minchah, and Yaakov davened Ma’ariv. This implies that the Rambam sides with Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina’s opinion, namely that the avos were mesaken tefillah.

The Kesef Mishnah, in Hilchos Tefillah, says that the Rambam paskens like Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi, that is to say that the tefillos were instituted to correspond to the korbanos. But the Lechem Mishnah there disagrees, opining that there is no indication from the Rambam that he paskens like the view that tefillos were instituted to correspond to the korbanos. This is because the Gemara in Berachos there says that even the opinion that holds that the avos instituted tefillah is in agreement that the rabbanan relied on the pesukim of the korbanos when they instituted the halacha that one must daven. Based on this we can suggest that there is no contradiction by the Rambam. The Rambam may pasken like Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina that the avos instituted tefillah; yet the rabbanan relied on, and based the times on, the korbanos.

The Ohr Somayach, in Hilchos Tefillah (3:9), suggests another solution to this contradiction. He says that in fact we pasken like both opinions. The Gemara cites two braisos, both ruling in accordance with each opinion; thus we pasken like both of them. The Ohr Somayach says that according to the opinion that the tefillos were mesaken to correspond to the korbanos, if one forgot to daven Minchah he would not be able to daven two Shemoneh Esreis during Ma’ariv. Why? Because the halacha by korbanos is that once the day has passed one cannot bring that korban any longer. However, since we also pasken that tefillah was instituted by the avos, we pasken that one should daven two Shemoneh Esreis in such a situation.

The Maharitz Chayis, in Berachos 26b, suggests another solution. He says that in fact the Rambam does pasken like Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi that tefillah was instituted to correspond to the korbanos. Everyone agrees, though, that the avos davened these tefillos. The dispute in the Gemara only concerns the institution of the tefillos that we daven. Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi agrees that Avraham davened Shacharis, Yitzchak davened Minchah and Yaakov davened Ma’ariv. He disagrees on the issue of the reason why we daven, saying that that is not the reason. Therefore the Rambam, while writing in Hilchos Melachim about the avos, mentions that they davened. He did not mean to indicate that this is the reason why we daven today. The reason is, as the Rambam writes in Hilchos Tefillah, because the rabbanan instituted tefillah to correspond to the korbanos.

This is in accordance with what the Rambam writes in Pirush HaMishnayos in Chullin (end of the seventh perek). The Rambam writes there that we do not do any of the things that were done before mattan Torah unless it was commanded to us at mattan Torah. For example, the Rambam says that we do not refrain from eating gid hanasheh because Yaakov Avinu was banned from eating it. Rather, this is because we were commanded to do so at Har Sinai. The Maharitz Chayis explains that this applies to tefillah as well; we do not daven because our avos did, but rather because we were commanded to do so thereafter.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Why Do We Daven?”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and many of the Bibicotters
Want to Tell the BibiCotters What You Think? Here’s How You Can.
Latest Judaism Stories
Hur and Aharon holding up Moshe's hands as Joshua battled Amalek.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Esther Denouncing Haman

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

Niehaus-022715

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

Mendlowitz-022715-Basket

The mishloach manos of times gone by were sometimes simple and sometimes elaborate, but the main focus was on the preparation of the delicious food they contained.

Does Hashem ever go away and not pay attention to us?

In other words, the Torah is an expression of the Way that we must follow in order to live a divine-like life and to bond in the highest way possible with God or Being Itself.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The avodah (service) of the kohen gadol is vital and highly sensitive; the world’s very existence depends on it.

Moreover, even if the perpetrator of the capital offense is never actually executed, such as when the fatal act was unintentional, Kam Lei applies and the judge cannot award damages.

Forever After?
‘Obligated for Challahh and Not Terumah’
(Kesubos 25a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

This was a spontaneous act of rest after the miracle of vanquishing their respective foes. The following year they celebrated on the same days as a minhag.

The way we must to relate to our young adult children is to communicate with genuine loving-kindness

Jewish prayer is a convergence of 2 modes of biblical spirituality, exemplified by Moses and Aaron

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

He suggests that the general admonition only dictates that a father may not actively enable his son to perform an aveirah.

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/why-do-we-daven/2013/10/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: