web analytics
October 30, 2014 / 6 Heshvan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Why Do We Daven?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Gemara in Berachos 26b brings a dispute regarding the origin of our obligation to daven.

Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina says that the avos where misaken the tefillos. The Gemara quotes a braisa that supports this view and cites pesukim from which we derive that Avraham was mesaken Shacharis, Yitzchak was mesaken Minchah, and Yaakov was mesaken Ma’ariv. Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi disagrees, saying that tefillah was instituted to correspond to the korbanos.

There were two korbanos that were brought daily, the tamid shel shacharis and the tamid shel bein ha’arbayim. Shacharis and Minchah correspond to these two korbanos while Ma’ariv corresponds to the burning of the eimurim from the korbanos – which was performed at night. The tefillos of Musaf were instituted to correspond to the korban musaf that was brought on specific days. The braisa adds that the times to daven these tefillos correspond to the times that the korbanos were brought.

The Rambam (Hilchos Tefillah 1:5) seemingly brings down the opinion of Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi. The Rambam writes that the tefillos were mesaken to correspond to the korbanos. However, in Hilchos Melachim (9:1), the Rambam writes that Avraham davened Shacharis, Yitzchak davened Minchah, and Yaakov davened Ma’ariv. This implies that the Rambam sides with Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina’s opinion, namely that the avos were mesaken tefillah.

The Kesef Mishnah, in Hilchos Tefillah, says that the Rambam paskens like Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi, that is to say that the tefillos were instituted to correspond to the korbanos. But the Lechem Mishnah there disagrees, opining that there is no indication from the Rambam that he paskens like the view that tefillos were instituted to correspond to the korbanos. This is because the Gemara in Berachos there says that even the opinion that holds that the avos instituted tefillah is in agreement that the rabbanan relied on the pesukim of the korbanos when they instituted the halacha that one must daven. Based on this we can suggest that there is no contradiction by the Rambam. The Rambam may pasken like Rabi Yosi ben Rabi Chanina that the avos instituted tefillah; yet the rabbanan relied on, and based the times on, the korbanos.

The Ohr Somayach, in Hilchos Tefillah (3:9), suggests another solution to this contradiction. He says that in fact we pasken like both opinions. The Gemara cites two braisos, both ruling in accordance with each opinion; thus we pasken like both of them. The Ohr Somayach says that according to the opinion that the tefillos were mesaken to correspond to the korbanos, if one forgot to daven Minchah he would not be able to daven two Shemoneh Esreis during Ma’ariv. Why? Because the halacha by korbanos is that once the day has passed one cannot bring that korban any longer. However, since we also pasken that tefillah was instituted by the avos, we pasken that one should daven two Shemoneh Esreis in such a situation.

The Maharitz Chayis, in Berachos 26b, suggests another solution. He says that in fact the Rambam does pasken like Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi that tefillah was instituted to correspond to the korbanos. Everyone agrees, though, that the avos davened these tefillos. The dispute in the Gemara only concerns the institution of the tefillos that we daven. Rabi Yehoshua ben Levi agrees that Avraham davened Shacharis, Yitzchak davened Minchah and Yaakov davened Ma’ariv. He disagrees on the issue of the reason why we daven, saying that that is not the reason. Therefore the Rambam, while writing in Hilchos Melachim about the avos, mentions that they davened. He did not mean to indicate that this is the reason why we daven today. The reason is, as the Rambam writes in Hilchos Tefillah, because the rabbanan instituted tefillah to correspond to the korbanos.

This is in accordance with what the Rambam writes in Pirush HaMishnayos in Chullin (end of the seventh perek). The Rambam writes there that we do not do any of the things that were done before mattan Torah unless it was commanded to us at mattan Torah. For example, the Rambam says that we do not refrain from eating gid hanasheh because Yaakov Avinu was banned from eating it. Rather, this is because we were commanded to do so at Har Sinai. The Maharitz Chayis explains that this applies to tefillah as well; we do not daven because our avos did, but rather because we were commanded to do so thereafter.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Why Do We Daven?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Abbas and the Temple Mount: "It's mine, all mine. No Jews allowed.
Abbas Declares Closure of Al Aqsa Mosque a ‘Declaration of War’
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

Why does Hebrew refer to mothers-in-law as “sunshine” when society often calls them the opposite?

Rabbi Avi Weiss, head of theYeshivat Chovevei Torah. Rabbi Asher Lopatin will be replacing him as head of the school.

Having herself been victimized by Pharoah, Sarah should have been more sensitive to Hagar.

The-Shmuz

Avram’s father was not impressed with the cleverness of his son. In fact, he was so unimpressed that he took him to Nimrod the king, who pronounced him an enemy of the state and attempted to execute him.

Lech Lecha Thumbnail

How do the stories in Lech Lecha help us understand the central tension of Abraham’s life, legacy?

Abraham did not govern society but instead was the representative of God’s kingdom on earth.

Hagar grossly miscalculated her own merits and demonstrated a serious lack of gratitude for Sarai.

Noach was the lonely man of faith living in a depraved world, full of wickedness.

Avraham became a great man during the 175 years of his life, while his predecessors became increasingly wicked, despite staggering knowledge, during their lifetimes of hundreds of years.

Shem realized that he owed his existence to his father who brought him into the world.

Law-Abiding Citizen
‘That Which Is Crooked Cannot Be Made Straight…’
(Yevamos 22a-b)

The flood was not sent to destroy, but to restore the positive potential of the world.

Question: I recently loaned money to a friend who has been able to repay only part of it. This was an interest-free loan. We exchanged a signed IOU, not a proper shtar with witnesses, since I have always trusted her integrity and only wanted a document that confirms what was loaned and what was repaid. Now that shemittah is approaching, what should I do? Should I forgive the loan? And if my friend is not able to repay it, may I deduct the unpaid money from my ma’aser requirement?

Name Withheld

Why is there is no mention of dinosaurs, and other prehistoric animals, in the Torah?

Strict din demands perfection. There is no room for shortcomings and no place for excuses; you are responsible.

Surprisingly, my husband and one son arrived home over half-an-hour earlier than usual. I excitedly shared my perfect-timing story, but my better half one upped me easily.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Others suggest that one cannot separate Shabbos from Yom Kippur by accepting Shabbos early.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

While women are exempt from actually learning Torah, they are obligated in a different aspect of the mitzvah.

The Chafetz Chaim answered that there are two forms of teshuvah; teshuvah m’ahava and teshuvah m’yirah.

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

They ask, how can Rabbeinu Gershom forbid marrying more than one wife, when the Torah explicitly permits it in this parshah?

First, how could a beis din of 23 judges present a guilty verdict in a capital punishment case? After all, only a majority of the 23 judges ruled in favor of his verdict.

According to Rabbi Yishmael one was not permitted to eat such an animal prior to entering Eretz Yisrael, while according to Rabbi Akiva one was permitted to eat animals if he would perform nechirah.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/why-do-we-daven/2013/10/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: