$gJD = gregoriantojd(date('n'),date('j'),date('Y'));
list($hebrewMonth, $hebrewDay, $hebrewYear) = split('/',jdtojewish($gJD));
$hebrewdate = "$hebrewDay ".jdmonthname( $gJD,4 ).", $hebrewYear";
$hebrewdate = preg_replace('/Adar/','Adar ',$hebrewdate);
$hebrewdate = preg_replace('/Iyyar/','Iyar',$hebrewdate);
Because they’ve developed a conception that certain views are to be adopted, and you can’t depart from them. And this applies to views regarding secular studies, Zionism, all sorts of issues, and certainly with regard to what’s come to be regarded as
[principles of faith]. Therefore, anything that shows that matters have not always been so clear, and that there were disputes about these things, is controversial.
In your writings and speeches, you reveal many little known facts such as: 1) Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch asked Rabbi Dovid Tzvi Hoffman to remove his hat (thus leaving him bareheaded) when visiting him at his school so that the non-Jewish teachers shouldn’t think him disrespectful; 2) The Akeidas Yitzchak (15th century Spanish scholar) maintained that non-Jews need not observe the seven Noachide laws; 3) Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook called Tolstoy a “great man who is full of holiness”; and 4) Rabbi Israel Moshe Hazzan (Sephardi sage, 1808-1862) wrote that one should incorporate church tunes into the davening since they lead to love of God. Why are things like these so unknown? Because yeshivas today don’t teach Jewish philosophy or theology. They teach hashkafa and emunah, which is fine, but that’s more like indoctrination. And whereas people are very sophisticated when it comes to Talmud study and they’ll look at all the different shittos, when it comes to philosophical study of Judaism – its history, its ideas – they’re not sophisticated and they’re not interested.
This prevents us from being able to respond to ideological challenges. Just as we assume that someone who approaches halachic issues without having a firm grasp of responsa literature, Shas and poskim is not doing his job, the problem here is that many people who approach the non-halachic matters don’t really have any background. It’s a serious discipline, Jewish philosophy and theology – just as serious as halacha, but not taken so.
In one of your recent works you mention that you are writing an article discussing many laws found in the Shulchan Aruch that were not or are not kept by Jews. Can you elaborate? It’s just another misconception people have that the Shulchan Aruch is always the last word in halacha, when there’s plenty of things we do which are not in accordance with it.
According to the Shulchan Aruch, when you lend money to someone, you need to do it in front of witnesses. Despite that ruling, however, nowadays if you lend your friend 50 dollars, you don’t do it in front of witnesses. Already the acharonim want to know why we don’t follow the Shulchan Aruch.
There are loads of examples. Some halachos in the Shulchan Aruch didn’t become accepted because other poskim argued or there was a tradition predating the Shulchan Aruch; others, because they were too difficult to keep, and then later poskim came and found justifications.
I think this sounds more explosive than it is. Everyone who knows halacha knows that there’s plenty of stuff we don’t do according to the Shulchan Aruch; this is not controversial.
Going back to Rabbi Weinberg, you write that he initially supported Hitler when he came to power. Well, it’s a real mussar haskel [lesson] for today – how to relate to Arab leaders who say one thing to diplomats and another to their own people – because Hitler was stating his views on the Jews and there were Jews, Rabbi Weinberg among them, who thought that this was just for the masses, that it wasn’t to be taken seriously. They didn’t think anti-Semitism was central to Nazism. They thought the real threat was communism, and they figured that once Hitler came into power, he’d just be another right-wing dictator like Mussolini. Mussolini was not anti-Semitic. Rabbi Weinberg wrote that “perhaps we [the Jewish people] also bear some guilt” for anti-Semitism. What did he mean by that? Rabbi Weinberg raised the possibility that perhaps the way Jews treat non-Jews contributes to anti-Semitism. He no doubt had in mind things such as how the Jew treated the Polish peasant and wondered if this didn’t have some impact on how the Poles viewed the Jews. Many Orthodox Jews thought it was okay to be less than honest in their business dealing with non-Jews.
About the Author: Marc Gottlieb is the webmaster for JewishPress.com. Marc has been crafting end-to-end online solutions for all sizes and types of businesses since 1995. You can see more samples of his work at http://www.marcgottlieb.com.
Marc made aliyah in 2006 with his wife and four children. They live in Gush Etzion, which is not in the West Bank.
Marc's political comments are entirely his own and do not reflect the opinions of JewishPress.com.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.
Current Top Story
Jordan’s King Dissolves Parliament, Stifles Riots Over Approval of Israeli Investment
- This Day in History: Prime Minister Netanyahu Wins in Direct Elections
on May 29, 2016 8:06 PM
- Terrorist Arrested After Throwing Firebomb Bag Into Kochav Yaacov
on May 29, 2016 7:37 PM
- Jordan’s King Dissolves Parliament, Stifles Riots Over Approval of Israeli Investment
on May 29, 2016 4:41 PM
- École Polytechnique and the Weizmann Institute of Science Sign Cooperation Agreement
on May 29, 2016 3:58 PM
- Report: Police Recommend Indicting Sara Netanyahu over PM’s Residence Charges
on May 29, 2016 2:25 PM
- Report: German Culture Minister Backs Jewish Delegate For Art Restitution Commission
on May 29, 2016 1:56 PM
- Corbyn Never Bothered to Answer Herzog’s Letter on Labour Anti-Semitism
on May 29, 2016 1:39 PM
- Joint Israeli Security Team Captures Hamas Terrorist Cell Behind Fiery Jerusalem Bus Bombing
on May 29, 2016 1:25 PM
- One Injured in Stonethrowing Near Tekoa
on May 29, 2016 1:04 PM
- IDF Sets Up Emergency Roadside Location Markers, Don’t Tell the Police
on May 29, 2016 12:55 PM
- World Health Organization Names Israel as Sole Abuser of Health Rights
on May 29, 2016 12:48 PM
- NJ Resident Convicted of Setting Fire to Synagogue, Rabbi’s Home
on May 29, 2016 12:39 PM
- Shaked Drops Bomb: Habayit Hayehudi Ready for New Elections
on May 29, 2016 12:08 PM
- Kulanu’s Leftwing Trend Continues: Housing Minister Supports Settlements Freeze
on May 29, 2016 11:04 AM
- Kahlon Says Netanyahu’s Coalition Safe – for Now
on May 29, 2016 10:20 AM
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/uncategorized/things-once-taken-for-granted-are-now-considered-unacceptable/2007/04/25/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: