Photo Credit: Jewish Press

In this week’s parshah the Torah recounts the episode of the mabul. Hashem instructed Noach to take a specimen of every animal into the teivah. Additionally, Noach had to bring provisions with him for himself, his family, and the animals in the teivah.

In His instructions to Noach, Hashem says, “V’ata kach lecha mikol ma’achal asher yochalvehaya lecha v’lahem l’achla – And you shall take for yourself of every food that you will eat…and it will be food for you and for them (Bereishis 6:21). The Chasam Sofer notes that the wording seems out of order. Hashem says “food for you and for them,” but the Gemara (Gittin 62) rules that a person must feed his animals before he feeds himself and his family. The Gemara derives this rule from the wording of the second parshah of Shema where “v’nasati eisev besadcha l’behemtecha – and I have placed grass in your fields for your animals” appears before “v’achalta v’savata – and you shall eat and be satiated.” How, then, do we explain, Hashem’s instructions to Noach in which he puts Noach before the animals?

Advertisement



The Rambam codifies the halacha that one must feed one’s animals before oneself in Hilchos Avadim (9:8), writing that it is a midas chassidus to act in this manner. Many wonder why the Rambam calls this practice a midas chassidus when it seems to clearly be an ikar halacha. Rav Moshe Feinstein (Dibros Moshe, Gittin 10:2) suggests that the ikar halacha is not to eat before feeding one’s animals. However, it is a midas chassidus not to even taste food before feeding one’s animals.

An interesting side note: The Magen Avraham (167:18) quotes the Sefer Chasidim who asks why Rivka Imeinu offered Eliezer water before offering water to his camels. The Sefer Chasidim answers that the prohibition to eat before one’s animals only applies to food, not to drink. Therefore, Rivka was permitted to give Eliezer water before giving water to his animals.

The Maharil Diskin answers our original question – why Hashem states “food for you and for them” (rather than “for them and for you”) – by explaining that until Noach exited the teivah humans were not allowed to eat animals. Therefore, he says, before that point people could not even own animals. It was only after permission was granted to eat animals that man was permitted to fully own animals. Therefore, before Noach exited the teivah, there was no need to mention feeding one’s animals before oneself since no animals belonged to humans.

This answer is based on the assumption that the obligation to feed one’s animals before oneself only applies to animals that one owns. However, there are authorities who maintain that a person must first feed any animal that is dependent on him for its food (see Chasam Sofer Yoreh Deah 314). According to these authorities, Noach had an obligation to feed the animals in the teivah before he fed himself. Thus, the question returns: Why did Hashem say “food for you and for them”?

I would suggest the following: Noach was preparing for a long journey in an ark while the entire world was being destroyed. He was told to bring enough food for himself and the animals in the teivah. Perhaps in a time of hunger and strife, the obligation to feed one’s animals first does not apply. Perhaps in dire situations it is better to feed oneself before one’s animals, even if there is probably enough food for both. In such situations, one must care for oneself more than one’s animals.

That might explain why Hashem said “food for you and for them.” He didn’t command Noach to feed his animals first; on the contrary, He specifically commanded him to feed the people first.

Advertisement

SHARE
Previous articleOnly Four NGOs Condemn Anti-Israeli Violence, Others Focus on Israeli ‘Unlawful Killing’
Next article‘Doctors for Human Rights’ Protest Picture of Teen Terrorist Who Wasn’t ‘Executed’
Rabbi Fuchs learned in Yeshivas Toras Moshe, where he became a close talmid of Rav Michel Shurkin, shlit”a. While he was there he received semicha from Rav Zalman Nechemia Goldberg, shlit”a. He then learned in Mirrer Yeshiva in Brooklyn, and became a close talmid of Rav Shmuel Berenbaum, zt”l. Rabbi Fuchs received semicha from the Mirrer Yeshiva as well. After Rav Shmuel’s petira Rabbi Fuchs learned in Bais Hatalmud Kollel for six years. He is currently a Shoel Umaishiv in Yeshivas Beis Meir in Lakewood, and a Torah editor and weekly columnist at The Jewish Press.

2 COMMENTS

  1. A short story: My Dad always fed his German shepherd, Duke, before eating his own evening meal. When I would fly down to visit him he always had steak the first night (he was a very frugal man.) On one such visit, he cooked the steaks, and gave his to Duke along with scrambled eggs, then fried an egg for his own meal. I asked him why he gave Duke his steak. He said he forgot to pick up Duke's dog food and as the dog could not go to the store and purchase it himself, he relied on my Dad for his food and water in return for guarding his property and providing companionship. That was their bargain. So Duke got the steak.
    I have never forgot the lessons my Dad taught. He wasn't Jewish but he was the best example of humanity to me. I will always miss him.

  2. In the Pennsylvania Deutsch community I grew up in, it was a Law amongst the older ones, that the animals always ate, before you did. Perhaps, our collective Yiddish accent has something to do with it? They were mostly Lutheran and Mennonite; but the Germans all wanted to know where my dad was, during the war, because he spoke with a Jewish accent. He was there during the occupation.

    The rationale was this; You can eat any time that you want to; they, cannot. It is because of your restraint of them, that they could not feed themselves; therefore, as they were your unwilling and unwitting servants, you were obligated to take care of their needs, first. As they serve you unwillingly, even unto their deaths, you have an obligation to serve them daily, in the mean time.

    A man who ate first, before feeding his animals, was considered to be a great sinner. His farm would become run down, and unproductive; and his life would become a burden unto him, as a punishment.

    But above all, it was considered to be an unbreakable Commandment of mein Gott im Himmel, that you do so.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...