Photo Credit:

“In this matter, in not making aliyah toIsrael, they didn’t have Emunah,” Rabbi Kook taught. “In other matters, they did believe. They believed, and yet they didn’t believe. This is a state of half-Emunah. Rashi, in the name of our Sages, cites this in regard to Noach, saying, ‘Noach was small in Emunah. Though he possessed Emunah, he did not truly believe in the flood’s coming, and did not enter the ark until the water forced him in’ (Bereshit, 7:7). Noach believed, and he didn’t believe. However, the foundation of our Emunah begins with Avraham Avinu. He wasn’t a half-believer. He believed with a complete faith.”

As I have stated and restated, I am not coming to criticize any  true awe and fear of God to be found amongst our beloved brothers in the Diaspora, but rather against the viewpoint that denies the centrality of theLandofIsraelto Judaism. There are many wonderful God fearing Jews throughout the Diaspora, who are serving Hashem and the Jewish People in many true and noble ways, in their charity, good deeds, Torah scholarship, prayer, and strict adherence to the fine details of the mitzvot. However, if they fall in love with the Diaspora and try to make a secondJerusalemout of Brooklyn orToronto,ChicagoorDallas, then something is wrong with their Judaism.


Rabbi Kook would emphasize this further by citing a Gemara (Berachot 63A and B), regarding Rabbi Haninah, a great Torah scholar who went down from Eretz Yisrael to the Diaspora. At that time, the Israelite Nation was in a sorrowful state, and many Gedolei Yisrael remained in galut. Rabbi Haninah was a leader of the generation, a giant in Torah. He began to intercalate years and determine the beginnings of the new months outside of the Land of Israel, something completely forbidden. Therefore, two Torah scholars were sent from Israel to fight against this.

Upon their arrival in Babylon, they took part in official ceremonies and didn’t reveal the purpose of their visit. They were received with great honor. Gradually, they started to vent their opposition. Finally, they entered a crowded assembly and said to the Jews of Babylon, “Behold, you are a great congregation. You can be independent. You don’t need Eretz Yisrael. You don’t need Mount Moriah.” Their sarcasm was purposely stinging in order to shock the Babylonian Jews. “And you’ve also got Rabbi Ahia here. Let Ahia build an altar, and let Haninah play on a harp. But know that if you detach yourselves from the centrality of Eretz Yisrael, you have no portion in the God of Israel!

The Gemara concludes, “Immediately, the people cried out in tears and exclaimed, ‘G-d forbid. We do have a portion in the God of Israel. For from Zion shall go forth the Torah, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.”

Get angry at the Gemara – don’t get angry at me!



  1. What is the relevance of where Rashi lived or had vineyards? In many generations it simply was not an option to get to Israel or to live here. We are so blessed in our time to have the privilege to be here. Baruch HaShem!

  2. If G-d tells you to murder a child, why should you do it?
    1) To get rewards in heaven / be closer to G-d.
    Why would I want to be closer to G-d using that ticket? I refuse on grounds of morality and justice.
    2) To avoid being punished by G-d.
    I admit, put a blow torch to my toes, I'll do anything. But that's not a good reason to conclude that's the right thing to do.
    3) To get G-d to do good things for you / your people later.
    I think we should trust G-d to be good, later, without us murdering the innocent.

    I. It's possible G-d is testing us to see if we'll reject the rewards and do what is right.
    If this is true, then the proper thing would be to refuse. Under this, it's wrong to listen to Voices, unless such Voice of G-d is not contradictory to morality.
    "There is no inconsistency for an Atheist to say, 'There is an independent morality but there is no God.'" The Atheist is not making any internal contradiction.
    – Rabbi Dovid Gottlieb, Phd in Logic, Orthodox Rabbi, Ohr Somayach Yeshiva.
    lecture on independent morality.
    (independent morality means morality is independent like math is independent, you don't have to believe in G-d to believe in math).

    Under I. notice that the rewards of the Torah promised to Avraham have, through the test of time, been exactly the price:
    Price: murder an innocent child.
    Reward: non-stop generation after generation being murdered by the goyim.

    II. It's possible G-d really wanted us to trust Him and His fulfilling His agreements.
    But we learned from the story of Cain that, even without a command, it's wrong to murder, the story reads that as a given. To ask me to go against that established by the bible and established by common sense and our expectations of Bnay Noach, it's a given that we should not murder the innocent. Future rewards do not justify violating that 'given' for which Cain was over and punished.
    Under II, G-d really really really wants us to murder the child. Again, I must face Him, refuse, and be destroyed. OK, so I'm going to be destroyed, G-d really wants us to be immoral, and perhaps I'll burn in hell forever.
    If I knew for a fact that I'd burn in hell forever, that would justify anything, even murdering anybody, I wouldn't blame the Muslims or Nazis for murdering people to avoid hell. But it would be an accusation against G-d, claiming that G-d has set up the world for us to be murderers to avoid G-d 'murdering' our eternal souls.
    That's a rude suggestion to make about the Perfect, Absolutely Good G-d.
    I wouldn't want my kids to think such of me, and that same reasoning is why I left Christianity, it's an insult to G-d to think He's going to be some eternal soul abuser for… for refusing to murder an innocent? Really? That's what G-d wants us to think of Him, He'll torture us forever (or 11 months) for refusing to murder our brother / child? What did Cain do wrong again?

    Let's go back to Avraham. He should have said, 'Respectfully, no. I'm not made to kill the innocent. You, G-d, may do so, but I am morally obligated to try to save the innocent from your diseases, your infliction, I was made to save the innocent, not kill them.

    If that had happened, it's logically possible, it's logically possible that G-d could have given us the same great Torah, minus the generations and generations of genocides as a consequence to our too quick payment of too great a price.

  3. Notice in Exodus 31 tens of thousands of baby boys were murdered because females did something wrong. Moshe did not have time to go, plead for their lives in the Tent of Meeting, come back, and reluctantly relay G-d's command. This proves Moshe was speaking for G-d interchangeably with his own, arbitrary judgment. Why waste time? What I say is what G-d wants, no need to actually go ask G-d what He really wants with these kids, I don't have time for that, I just found out about these things, Hinay, what have you done? Did you let them live? Really? Kill them, all the boys, after all, their mothers did something wrong.

    Wow. Not only is that immoral, that's illogical. The baby boys are to be executed for the crime of… their mothers doing something.


    you know, modern morality wasn't known back then. We, as human beings, kind of knew it was wrong, but only after the Holocaust have we, as global human beings, discovered it's morally wrong to kill large numbers of innocent people.

    The Greeks had an idea of 'virtue', but it wasn't the same, modern morality we have today. Their gods went around raping human women, etc,

    Today, we have learned from the past and grown.

  4. Let’s not get angry at Rashi but rather at ourselves for not learning, accepting and doing what Rashi taught. Who can say what was in Rashi’s heart? HaShem knows what is in our hearts better than we do.

    In parashat VaYera, Lot went up from Tzoar and he settled in the hills along with his two daughters, they both got him drunk and became pregnant from him. One opinion is that the girls had the highest motives and they were therefore worthy that the Messiah would be their descendant. The older girl’s son was named Moab (means “from a father”). Ruth, the great-grandmother of King David was a Moabite (Ruth 4:17). As is well-known, the Messiah will be a descendant of David. (Rashi; Bereh Rabbah).

    According to Me’Am Lo’Ez, Vol 2 pg 251, “Others say that the girls were driven by their sexual appetites. Still they were worthy of this miracle, if only to demonstrate the extent of divine reward. If G-d performs miracles for those who violate His will, how much more will He do for those who obey His will.” (Yafeh Toar).

    Let's bring this down to the present day elections. For you to knowingly support those who want to destroy Israel and vote for the Muslim president who supports those (Muslim Brotherhood) who also want to destroy Israel, IMO, Hashem is not going to perform a miracle and have you make aliyah to Israel without sin and without problems from the first day that you arrive here for corruption is in your hearts. You cannot expect to keep acting like Zemri and to keep expecting a reward like Pinchas.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...