web analytics
October 24, 2014 / 30 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



E-1 Contiguity Fallacy Returns

The media claims that Jewish construction in E1 preempts the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state, but that is not the case.
By:

Israelis celebrating a settlement dedication ceremony in the area known as E1, aka Mevasseret Adumim, September 07, 2009.

Israelis celebrating a settlement dedication ceremony in the area known as E1, aka Mevasseret Adumim, September 07, 2009.
Photo Credit: Uri Lenz/Flash90

With Israel’s announcement that it plans to proceed with construction in Area E-1, east of Jerusalem, earlier falsehoods about that land reemerge. Thus, Ha’aretz reports that construction in E-1

would effectively bisect the West Bank and sever the physical link between the Palestinian territories and Jerusalem.

Similarly, the New York Times reports:

Construction in E1, in West Bank territory that Israel captured in the 1967 war, would connect the large Jewish settlement of Maale Adumim to Jerusalem, dividing the West Bank in two. The Palestinian cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem would be cut off from the capital, making the contiguous Palestinian state endorsed by the United Nations last week virtually impossible.

So is it true that construction in E-1 would bisect the West Bank, and severing Palestinian contiguity, and cutting off Palestinian areas from Jerusalem? The answer is no. As CAMERA pointed out in 2005 (“The Contiguity Double Standard“):

Palestinian contiguity in the West Bank would be no more cut off with the so-called E-1 corridor than would Israeli contiguity if Israel were to withdraw to its pre-1967 borders, even with slight modifications.

Here’s why. First, take a look at this map of the region:

e1 continguity.jpg

As CAMERA earlier explained:

The black X marks the approximate location of the new neighborhood near Ma’aleh Adumim. To the west of the X is Jerusalem. The red line surrounding the X is the planned route of the security barrier, which will encircle Ma’aleh Adumim and Jerusalem.

Those who charge that Israeli building in Ma’aleh Adumim severs north-south contiguity disregard the fact that Palestinian-controlled areas would be connected by land east of Ma’aleh Adumim (marked on the map) that is at its narrowest point ~15 km wide.

Moreover, Israel proposes to build tunnels or overpasses to obviate the need for Palestinians to detour to the east through the corridor.

Ironically, many of those who argue for greater contiguity between Palestinian areas, at the same time promote Israeli withdrawal to its pre-1967 boundaries, which (even with minor modifications) would confine Israel to a far less contiguous territory than that of the West Bank. As shown on the map above, there is a roughly 15 km wide strip of land separating the Green Line (and the Security Fence) from the Mediterranean Sea (near Herzliya). Also shown is the circuitous route necessary to travel via this corridor between northern and southern Israel. (e.g. from Arad to Beit Shean.)

Nor is it true that the construction would cut off Palestinian areas from Jerusalem. Access to Jerusalem through Abu Dis, Eizariya, Hizma and Anata is not prevented by the proposed neighborhood, nor would it be precluded by a string of neighborhoods connecting Ma’aleh Adumim to Jerusalem.

Originally published at CAMERA.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

19 Responses to “E-1 Contiguity Fallacy Returns”

  1. Bob Pollack says:

    Go ahead, this part of Israel any way.

  2. Bob Pollack says:

    Go ahead, this part of Israel any way.

  3. use the land and build on it, Its part of Israel,

  4. Dean Goodson says:

    Jerusalem is our eternal and undivided capital !

  5. Ron Kall says:

    The world hates Israel, Israel should just do what they need to do to survive and flourish. Just rename Jordan back to Palestine and stand on the premise that the "Palestinian people" already have their country. Stop sending aid to Gaza, retake the Sinai.

  6. Charlie Hall says:

    It is NOT part of Medinat Yisrael.

  7. Gil Gilman says:

    I'm all for Israel's linkage with E-1. If they don't do it now, it will be more difficult in the future. It is property belonging to Israel, so why not?

  8. Is 'CAMERA' the only positive authority you could find? Because we all know how rational their reporting is!

  9. As the occupying force, it is only right that Israel send aid to Gaza.

  10. Gil Gilman says:

    Are you saying that their report is positive?

  11. Stephen Bennett – tell me two things please.

    First name one single legal claim for the Arabs to Gaza. Bet you won't even attempt it.

    Second – according to the Geneva Convention to be an occupying force one has to be the government. Are you really attempting to claim that we are the government in Gaza? Really?

    We are the only people that occupy a place that we legally own and do it without a single person being present. What a frigging miracle

  12. They are far more rational and logical than you that is for sure

  13. How about dealing with the substance of the article, instead of hoping that a purely ad hominem attack will substitute for reasoned analysis.

  14. Lorne Rovet says:

    build away, you know what jew-haters think of us no matter what we do.

  15. You seem incredibly hostile Loren. I will do my best to answer your ill-informed questions.

    Firstly, for you to ask me to supply legal precedence when Israel continuously and relentlessly demonstrates total disregard for the international rule of law and due process smacks somewhat of hypocrisy. Still, that is the Israeli modus operandi: Others must obey the rules; Israel will pick the ones that suit its aims.

    As you well know, Israel relinquished all rights to Gaza with the 'Disengagement' plan, completed August 2005. This plan was a brilliant piece of propaganda since it persuaded the Israeli people that Gaza had been handed to the Palestinian Authority in return for peace.

    However, Israel remained in control of Gaza's coastline and airspace and reserved the right to undertake military operations when necessary; it continued to provide (control) Gaza with water, communication, electricity, and sewage networks; existing customs arrangements with Israel — under which imports from Israel to Gaza are not taxed, exports from Gaza to Israel are taxed, and Israel collects customs duties on foreign products entering Gaza—will remain in force and the Israeli currency will continue to be used.

    Now, I don't know about you, but in my book, that's not 'disengaging'. What that is, is clearing out all the Jewish people so that the remaining people can be summarily controlled without harm to one's own people.

    However, because the Palestinian Authority in Gaza does not believe it has sufficient control of the area at this time, foreign observers such as the International Committee of the Red Cross,[5] Human Rights Watch[6] and various legal experts[7] have argued that the disengagement will not end Israel's legal responsibility as an occupying power in Gaza (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%27s_unilateral_disengagement_plan).

    So in fact Loren, it seems that Israel has a LEGAL responsibility to the people of Gaza. And are they going to honour this responsibility?

    I'm sure you will cite the election of Hamas as a defence for the current atrocities. But unfortunately, that's how democracy works. Many did not want the Muslim Brotherhood to gain further power in Egypt, but in the first free election in over 3000 years, that's what the people wanted. In Gaza, they wanted Hamas (despite Israel and the US meddling to try and get Fatah elected). The Israeli response – to blockade the strip has been seen by everyone as an illegal act.

    And please don't try the old 'Geneva Convention' trick. According to The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the illegal settlements in the Occupied Territories.

    If you want others to use the uphold the Law, so too, must you. Like I said earlier, Others must obey the rules; Israel will pick the ones that suit its aims.
    That is so Israel.

  16. Rational? Logical? Camera?
    Haha!!

  17. You don't have to be a Jew-hater to recognise an illegal act.

  18. Arie's Pragmatic Politics says:

    No surprise that the gaza based nazi owned haaretz and the Episcopal owned NY Times as always joined forces to attack Israel with canards and lies, and were forced – albeit on the obituary page – that they lied. Not surprising from a media in the US that has attacked the very existence of Jews since the Shoah, and the publisher of Ha'aretz who has openly penned an editorial stating "the cure for world peace is for all Jews to intermarry," thereby eradicating Jewry. I am just grateful neither is Jewish.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Miniature Torah at the women's section of the Western Wall Friday morning.
Women of the Wall Smuggle Tiny Torah Scroll to Western Wall
Latest Blogs Stories
"Shiloh"

Shiloh, where the Mishkan stood for near 400 years, was the spiritual capital of the Jewish Nation.

Chaye Zisel Braun

Arab terrorism against Jews and the State of Israel is not something we should be “calm” about.

European Union

Is the EU “Jewish challenged”?

Car in Light Rail Runover

The headlines refused to scream “ARAB TERROR ATTACK;” instead the phrase “Suspected Terror Attack.”

I’ve heard many times I write what others think, making them extremely happy; that’s why I continue.

Though secular, Hitman’s CV includes writing music for, recording, and popularizing religious songs.

Polls indicate that the Palestinians are much more against a two state solution than the Israelis.

Has the Jewish world adapted to the times? Hear the answer with Doug and his guest, Rabbi Berel Wein.

Leon Klinghoffer’s daughters: “‘Klinghoffer’ is justified as ‘a work of art’…This is an outrage.”

Kids bring in the light and let out the darkness through breathing exercises; it changes people.

If I make a million dollars in 2 weeks, how can I observe something like this and sit by quietly?”

Sometimes collective action against the heinous acts of the majority is not enough. The world should not only support the blockade of Gaza; it must enforce the dismantling of Hamas.

How long will it take for Israel and the Jewish World to admit that we are in very serious danger?

How do changes in technology affect the human life and our interactions with each other?

Palestinians (and Jordanians) often use the term “provocation” regarding Israeli action in Jerusalem

The zealots who engineered the ban have been publicly disgraced.

More Articles from CAMERA
.

First published on CAMERA Palestinian officials and the public have long pressed for the release of Palestinian prisoners, who are revered as heroes in government-controlled Palestinian media. Over the last several decades, Israel has released thousands of such prisoners, often times as goodwill gestures. This spring, President Mahmoud Abbas has reportedly insisted in talks with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on the release of all Palestinian prisoners, […]

Israelis celebrating a settlement dedication ceremony in the area known as E1, aka Mevasseret Adumim, September 07, 2009.

The media claims that Jewish construction in E1 preempts the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state, but that is not the case.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/guest-blog/e-1-contiguity-fallacy-returns/2012/12/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: