Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.
Last week, on a wet and windy night in Manhattan, hundreds flocked into the beautiful main sanctuary of Kehillat Jeshurun to hear Nobel-laureate economist and Israeli citizen Robert (Yisrael) Aumann preach the word.
Unpretentiously, sporting an open shirt and a very long white flowing beard, Professor Aumann stood on the bimah (synagogue platform) and addressed us in perfect English. Here was a man who fled Nazi Germany when he was a teenager, found refuge and an education in America, then moved to Israel fifty years ago. Now he was back in New York to deliver a sobering message under the rubric of the Bella and Harry Wexner Distinguished Speakers Series on the occasion of Mrs. Wexner’s fifth yahrzeit.
Dr. Aumann is a plain-talker, slow, deliberate, occasionally funny, but easy to understand. He is also profound. While the audience was respectful, and very attentive, their applause was reserved. The hour was late, and many were in their 60′s, 70′s, even 80′s. Jews also have a long history of not wanting to listen to hard, prophetic truths. We love life, hate war, and want to live our lives in peace. We always hope things will get better, but we also know that they can be – and have sometimes been – a lot worse. We don’t always want to plan ahead.
For example, in 1980 I participated in a United Nations international conference in Copenhagen where Israel was demonized in unprecedented ways. The conference, which was supposed to have been about women, had been hijacked by a Soviet- and Arab-orchestrated campaign against Israel.
Afterward, I flew to Israel and was interviewed in all the major media about an emerging anti-Semitism. I returned home and met with many American-Jewish organizations. I proposed that they consider working on programs to combat the anti-Israel propaganda that would eventually overwhelm us. Everyone gave me a very polite, even warm, hearing, but it did not lead to anyone tackling the project.
Now here we are many years later, after Oslo, a second intifada, Gaza and Lebanon. Professor Aumann made no false promises, did not enumerate “ten easy steps to an immediate and lasting peace” that many Jews insist on hearing. What he did suggest was bracing, stoic, measured, challenging, useful – and therefore perhaps even hopeful.
Dr. Aumann got right to the point, saying what needed to be said with gravity and clarity. Although these last six years of the intifada have been very hard both for Israelis and for all who love Israel, this great man told them that our children and grandchildren and even great-grandchildren will still be fighting for peace in the Middle East. Yes, peace will come – but not for a long time.
Dr. Aumann pointed out that “war is always with us, it’s a phenomenon, not a specific event.” He suggested that we study war as a “general phenomenon,” not war as it occurs in one place or another. He asked: “Can war be rational? His answer: “Yes. It is a mistake to say that war is irrational.”
In his view, “our Arab cousins and enemies” and their “shahids” are very “rational.” They know what they want and they are patient – they have all the time in the world. They are also “highly idealistic.” Treating them as “irrational madmen” is wrong.
Our enemies are motivated – we motivate them. “They want the Jews out. They believe they can accomplish this through violence and the cultivation of patience.” Dr. Aumann said that the expulsion of Jews, by Jews, from Gaza came about because of the anxious Jewish need for “peace now,” but that in his view, such anxiety and impatience led directly to the recent war in Lebanon, a war he believes Israel lost.
He is convinced there is no room for equivocation: The only way to bring about peace “is to convince our Arab cousins that we are not the Crusaders. We are here to stay. They must be convinced that we will not move, that we also have time. And even if we want peace in 10-20 years we have to change our policy now. Our people, not just our government, were all responsible for the expulsion and for each and every act of capitulation.’
About the Author: Dr. Phyllis Chesler is a professor emerita of psychology, a Middle East Forum fellow, and the author of fifteen books including “Women and Madness” (1972), “The New Anti-Semitism” (2003), and her latest, “An American Bride in Kabul” (2013). Her articles are archived at www.phyllis-chesler.com.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Turkey and Iran the 2 regional powers surrounding the ISIS conflict gain from a partial ISIS victory
Emigration from Israel is at an all-time low, far lower than immigration to Israel from Europe.
Leon Klinghoffer’s daughters: “‘Klinghoffer’ is justified as ‘a work of art’…This is an outrage.”
Sometimes collective action against the heinous acts of the majority is not enough. The world should not only support the blockade of Gaza; it must enforce the dismantling of Hamas.
The Arab Spring has challenged Jordan with the task of gradual reform with regard to its monarchy.
Israel offered Syria the entire Golan Heights, only to find that the Syrians were demanding MORE!
Israeli hasbara too can be described at best as pathetic, at worst non existent.
A ‘good news’ story from the Nepal avalanche disaster to warm your heart. Take out your Kleenex.
Journalists see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as morality play: Israel=evil; Palestine=innocent
Warsaw Ghetto: At its height, the Nazis walled in some 500,000 Jews within the1.3 square mile area.
While police officers face dangers every day on the job, Jews also face danger in their daily lives.
Carter developed a fondness for Arafat believing “they were both ordained to be peacemakers by God”
If Hamas is ISIS, the world asks, why didn’t Israel destroy it given justification and opportunity?
That key is the disarming of Hamas and the demilitarization of Gaza – as the U.S., EU, and others agreed to in principle at the end of Operation Protective Edge.
Few of the volunteers were experienced sailors, (Greenfield had been in the Merchant Marine). Few were Zionists.
My good colleague Kay is wrong about the early demise of conspiracy theories and blood libels against the Jews.
“I am surprised those Zionists are not outside protesting,” says one woman.
“Miral” is a film that has garnered an inordinate amount of media attention. In interviews, the director, Julian Schnabel, defends his right to tell the Palestinian “narrative” for what he claims is the first time. He seems not to know that many others before him have specialized in this particular line of work.
Our beloved, miraculous Jewish state is under siege.
It was assumed that the ceaseless persecution of the Jews in exile would cease once we again had our own sovereign homeland, our own army, navy, and air force.
In 1947-1948 I lived in Boro Park where, against parental and rabbinic advice, I joined a Zionist group. By 1950 I was packing machine-gun parts for Israel in a home not far from the Young Israel. But what I did as a child does not compare to what my friend and colleague David Gutmann did for love of Zion at that very time on the dangerous open seas.
Reality has become somewhat Scandinavian. It grows dark early and it is bitterly cold here in New York City and over a good portion of our fair land. Our Prince of Peace (The Norwegian Nobel, not the noble variety) is not yet asking whether “to be or not to be.” Perhaps he is not entirely convinced that “that is the question.”
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/it-is-in-our-hands-the-aumann-doctrine-unvarnished-and-profound/2006/11/22/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: