web analytics
May 23, 2013 /14 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Home » Judaism » Torah »

Q & A: Hachana (Conclusion)

tell a friend

QUESTION: Is it halachically permissible to pack on Shabbat or Yom Tov for a trip to be taken on the next day (Motza’ei Shabbat or Motza’ei Hachag)?
Moishe Halberstam, Esq.
Brooklyn, NY
 
ANSWER: We began our discussion with the general premise that it is preferable not to pack on Shabbat or a holiday in preparation of a trip to be taken subsequently, on a weekday. Some halachic authorities prohibit doing so. This activity would be categorized as hachana or preparation on Shabbat or a holiday for a need after Shabbat or the holiday, which is prohibited. Items not intended for use on the same day of Shabbat or a holiday are considered muktzeh, a biblically based concept (Exodus 16:5; Beitza 2b), the Torah’s frame of reference being food preparation.

In order to be able to prepare food on one day of a holiday for the next day of that holiday or for a Shabbat that immediately follows it, an eruv tavshilin (two types of food set aside as preparation of a meal) is prepared, the reasoning being that food is prepared for that same day
and it is the leftovers that are used on the following day. With this reasoning, the prohibition of hachana is avoided in the preparation of food. Though the Torah refers to food only, other types of preparation are included as well.

We also focused on the issues of hachana as they relate to garments and beds. Garments may be folded after being worn if they will be worn again on Shabbat; if they are folded by just one person; are new and not laundered yet; are white; and if the person has no other garment to wear. Beds may be made up on Friday night for the Shabbat day, but not on Shabbat day in preparation for Saturday night. However, should the unmade bed cause embarrassment (i.e., it is in a room where one will receive guests), the bed may be made, as this is now a need for Shabbat itself. A comment by the Mishna Berura (Orach Chayyim 302:3-18) indicates that not to fold at all (on Shabbat or a holiday) is a praiseworthy stringency.

We presented the views of R. Y. Neuwirth (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchatah, Vol. I 28:70). He bases his rulings on the Mishna Berura (254:43), and concludes that on Shabbat and holidays one may perform an activity which would fulfill a need of a subsequent weekday if a monetary loss would occur without such intervention, but provided no extra effort is required to accomplish it, and the opportunity to do so will not present itself again later. An example offered was the soaking and salting (within three days) of meat of an animal that has been slaughtered. If Shabbat is the third day, and the koshering process has not been started yet, it may be started on Shabbat, preferably by rinsing one’s hands over a pot containing the meat. R. Neuwirth also described how one would put away a pile of clean, dry, laundry so as to avoid the prohibition of choosing – the work of borer – on Shabbat or a holiday.

We discussed the ruling that on Shabbat we are permitted to place used clothing into an unplugged washing machine that has no water in it, and also to replace food and drinks into the refrigerator on Shabbat, although both these actions seem to involve hachana. This is permitted because we wish to contain any odors that may emanate from the used clothing and because these activities involve the normal routine of placing items in their regular places; also, we are permitted to take action to prevent monetary loss, such as spoilage of food that needs to be refrigerated.

We detailed further examples of activities that entail hachana on Shabbat but are nevertheless allowed. We conclude this week with a more defined explanation of what is allowed to be done on Shabbat in preparation for the weekdays.

* * *

R. Shimon Greenfeld (1861-1930), one of the outstanding geonim in Hungary, served as rabbi in Semihaly. He authored the monumental halachic work Responsa Maharshag, where he discusses an interesting case involving hachana from Shabbat to a weekday. The case there (op. cit. Vol. 1:61) is relevant to our question, although the setting is quite different from that of our modern society.

If one wanted kosher milk in Semihaly, one had to either own a milk cow or secure milk from a neighbor. If the neighbor was a non-Jew, the presence of a Jew was required at the time of the milking, otherwise the kosher status of the milk was questionable as one could not be sure that milk from a non-kosher source had not been mixed in.

R. Greenfeld was asked about the halachic legality of a Jewish woman going with her non-Jewish maid to observe the milking of a non-Jew’s cow on Shabbat. The maid carried the containers to the farm (as there was no eruv there), and the milk was intended for use only
after Shabbat. The individual who posed this question was himself a rabbi, and he was asking how this could be accomplished in spite of the clear issues of hachana involved. The questioner mentioned that one may not prepare on the first day of a holiday for the second day of the holiday, even when no forbidden labors are involved (Orach Chayyim 503). For example, we do not bring wine, on the first day, to be used for the Kiddush on the second day of the holiday. Also, as discussed by the Magen Avraham (Orach Chayyim 667:1), one is not permitted to search and ready the Torah (by rolling the scroll to the desired spot), on Shabbat or a holiday, to facilitate the next day’s reading, even if the second day is a holiday as well, although reading the Torah is a devar mitzva, that is, it involves the fullfilment of a mitzva, and no prohibited labor is required.

Thus, in the case of the milk, where there is no devar mitzva and the milk is intended for use after Shabbat, what is the halacha?

This does look like a classic example of hachana as stated in the Mishna (Shabbat 113a). There we learn that we may not arrange (spread sheets on) the beds on Shabbat for use at the conclusion of [Motza'ei] Shabbat. However, that applies specifically  there the intent is “leharvi’ach zeman,” lit. to gain time, namely, to accomplish the chore during the leisurely Shabbat afternoon in order to save time after Shabbat. This would be considered hachana, and is forbidden.

The rinsing of dishes is also discussed. If one’s sole intention for doing so on Shabbat is to save time after Shabbat, this would be prohibited. This includes preparing wine for a holiday immediately following the Sabbath or even for Havdala, as well as preparing a Torah for the next day’s reading. These activities are prohibited on Shabbat as they constitute hachana for after Shabbat, and they can easily be accomplished later.

However, this cannot be said in the case of the milk. R. Greenfeld ruled that a prohibition does not seem to be warranted despite the hachana involved. Surely, the non-Jewish owner of the cow will milk his cow anyway, but the Jews will not have milk for the following day(s).
Therefore, leniency is indicated.

R. Greenfeld also discusses (Vol. 2:21) a case of a similar category regarding a holiday. The municipal government at the time would issue special notes which had to be obtained in order to secure flour. They were redeemable only on Mondays. The question here involved a
Monday which was a holiday. R. Greenfeld ruled as he did with the milk. Since this was a matter which could not be taken care of later, and the families affected would suffer from hunger without the flour, there was no restriction against redeeming the notes on the proper day.

Thus we see that if one’s intention is simply to save time after
Shabbat, these activities would be prohibited. However, if the purpose is
to accomplish, on Shabbat or on a holiday, an action that cannot be
postponed but does not involve a forbidden labor, it is permitted.

R. Moshe Feinstein discussed a similar case as well (Responsa Iggrot Moshe, Orach Chayyim Vol. 3:105). He was asked whether one is allowed to dress one’s young children in pajamas while it is still Shabbat although they will go to sleep only after Havdala. R. Feinstein explained
that according to his understanding, the routine for most small children – from two to four years of age and perhaps a bit older – is to change into pajamas a while before they go to bed, and they then run around for a while in their pajamas until they are tired. Thus, it would seem that pajamas have become the accepted way to dress at this time period, and a child may therefore be changed into pajamas an hour or two before Havdala.

However, the question may be whether it is permissible to dress the child in pajamas even earlier, when wearing pajamas is unusual, because the mother thinks that she may not have time to do it later, or if this specific child is usually not dressed in pajamas several hours
before bedtime, but the mother has free time now on Shabbat. In both of these cases there would be reason to prohibit this. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to absolutely prohibit this in every case because often a child will dirty his clothing and has to be changed anyway, and since bedtime is approaching, the parents wish to use pajamas; and that would be permitted even though, in the process, time is saved on Motza’ei Shabbat.

We understand from here that an action taken on Shabbat solely to save time after Shabbat is prohibited. R. Feinstein is consistent in applying this rule. Another case mentioned addresses folding the tallit after services on Shabbat and taking it [within an eruv, of course] home (Iggrot Moshe, Orach Chayyim 5:20). R. Feinstein permits bringing the tallit home for if the tallit is left behind, the owner would worry about losing his possession. R. Feinstein reasons that if the owner carries the tallit home, surely he must fold it (but only in the halachically accepted
manner) to fit it into the tallit case to facilitate carrying.

We return to our original question, where one is anticipating travel after Shabbat. Certainly, it is better not to plan a trip that requires travel immediately after Shabbat. However, sometimes that cannot be avoided. For example, one is invited to a simcha that begins soon after Shabbat and takes place in a distant location; or one has young children who must be put to bed as early as possible to facilitate an early departure; or one must vacate a hotel room at a certain time, which happens to be just when Shabbat ends. For these and similar cases, when one has no choice, we offer the following solution.

We assume that when leaving from home, the suitcases will be packed before Shabbat. Away from home, for that Shabbat, instead of unpacking the suitcases and using the hotel drawers, one should rather keep the suitcase packed and simply remove items as needed on Shabbat, and then return them there when finished with them, so that the suitcase has now become the “rightful place” for the items. As we discussed earlier, storing soiled clothing presents no problem as we do not leave them about on Shabbat due to their odor. Care should be taken that muktzeh items (i.e., shavers, hair dryers, pens, money) are placed in a separate suitcase. Garment bags are hung up but left unpacked, and weekday clothing may be put on only after Shabbat ends. In this manner, there is a minimum of packing required after Shabbat, and a lot of time is saved.

From our above discussions regarding lost opportunities, we conclude that only if the necessity to leave after Shabbat arises unexpectedly and being late will cause an opportunity to be lost, may one, even on Shabbat, pack those (non-muktzeh) items that one absolutely requires
for the trip.

tell a friend

About the Author: Rabbi Yaakov Klass, rav of Congregation K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush, Brooklyn, is Torah Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at yklass@jewishpress.com.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Women and baby at Givat Asaf. A US Embassy officials attended a hearing on a Peace Now petition to story the community
US Implicitly Backs Peace Now Petition to Destroy Outpost
Latest Judaism Stories
The-Shmuz

Miriam spoke disparagingly about Moshe Rabbeinu. Because of this, she contracted tzaras, and for seven days she was sent outside the camp of Israel.

Business-Halacha-logo

Samuel Scherr was a very successful businessman. He also was generous and would share of his wealth with others. In this way, he became the uncle of favor to his nieces and nephews, whom he would frequently shower with gifts.

Daf-Yomi-logo

Detached Or Unrelated
‘He Made An Asheirah Tree Into a Ladder…’
(Eruvin 78b)

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In this week’s parshah we read about the individuals who were tamei and thus could not bring the korban Pesach. They approached Moshe Rabbeinu and asked him whether there was anything they could do to bring the korban. Ultimately, Hashem told Moshe that they should bring a korban a month after Pesach, on the 14th of Iyar.

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

One of the thirty-nine prohibited melachot on Shabbat is carrying an object from a private domain, reshut hayachid, to a public domain, reshut harabim, or carrying an object a distance of four amot, six to eight feet, in a reshut harabim. The Torah does permit, however, carrying within the reshut hayachid itself. The definition of a reshut hayachid and a reshut harabim is crucial, therefore, to the laws of carrying on Shabbat.

Question: The Midrash notes that the song the Jews sang after they crossed the Red Sea (“Az Yashir”) was unique; its likes had never been heard before in the world. Our Sages even refer to it as a shirah chadashah, a “new song.” What made “Az Yashir” so unique and in what sense was it a “new song”?

The rav was not a wealthy man, but earned enough to live comfortably. He earned his money by serving as the rav of a religious community in Yerushalayim. He also received some royalties from sefarim he had written over the years. He was well known, and many people approached him for a berachah, advice and help. They were not turned away.

Tanach, the Hebrew Bible, is remarkable for the extreme realism with which it portrays human character. Its heroes are not superhuman. Its non-heroes are not archetypal villains. The best have failings; the worst often have saving virtues. I know of no other religious literature quite like it.

Last week I shared a letter from a newly observant Jewish woman. She and her husband reside in a small suburban community outside of Los Angeles. Last year they came to consult with me on a personal religious issue. While they were both ba’alei teshuvah, there was one fine difference between them. He had become a ba’al teshuvah earlier than she and was therefore somewhat more settled in an observant lifestyle.

I watch my children use blocks to build a large structure, observing the trepidation with which they add each block. As the structure becomes larger there is a greater risk of it collapsing, thus bringing an end to an hour of playful labor. I anticipate what will happen when one child adds a block to the top floor, compromising the integrity of the building and resulting in the collapse of the entire structure. The argument that ensues is predictable, as each child blames the other for “ruining” the fun. As an adult, I wonder about the need to attribute blame. Will assigning blame be instrumental in rebuilding the structure?

In this week’s parshah the Torah discusses the halachos of when one steals from another and when confronted in beis din, the thief swears falsely with his denial that he stole. This parshah was already taught in parshas Vayikra; however, there are two halachos that the Torah adds in this parshah to this topic.

In order to carry from one’s home into the street (even when the area is enclosed by a properly constructed eruv), the eruvin ceremony must be performed. This ceremony involves the placing of food in one designated home on behalf of all Sabbath observers in the enclosed area. In order for the eruvin ceremony to be valid, however, it must be performed on behalf of all owners of streets and homes in the enclosed area.

Hymie was visiting Israel and enjoying an afternoon with his grandchildren in the park. After pushing them on the swings and watching them slither down the slides, he went to sit down on a bench in the corner of the park.

Question: On Friday night the chazzan in many shuls ascends the bimah for Kabbalat Shabbos but goes to the amud starting for Barchu. Why?

More Articles from Rabbi Yaakov Klass
QuestionsandAnswers-logo

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As the shamash in a small community shul with an aging population, I am faced with numerous challenges. The following is only one of them. During sefirah, different people daven for the amud for Ma’ariv. Once, a bar mitzvah was one of them. On another occasion, a very recent ger lead the service. Were these individuals allowed to lead the congregation in counting sefirah? I also wonder, in general, if everyone should be trusted to lead the counting. What if someone forgot to count on one of the previous nights but does not inform anyone of this?

No Name
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As the shamash in a small community shul with an aging population, I am faced with numerous challenges. The following is only one of them. During sefirah, different people daven for the amud for Ma’ariv. Once, a bar mitzvah was one of them. On another occasion, a very recent ger lead the service. Were these individuals allowed to lead the congregation in counting sefirah? I also wonder, in general, if everyone should be trusted to lead the counting. What if someone forgot to count on one of the previous nights but does not inform anyone of this?

No Name
(Via E-Mail)

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/torah/q-a-hachana-conclusion/2003/08/01/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close