Family court, visitation and child support are all unavoidable realities for divorced parents. One particular rule that would be wise to heed is that child support should be less about dollars and cents and more about dollar and “good” sense.
If we take a honest look at the word “support” it is actually defined as: to hold up, bear, carry, sustain or maintain, thereby providing parents with many opportunities to be supportive that do not have necessarily have monetary implications. On a daily basis there are occasions where parents can be supportive of their children which don’t involve opening their wallets – helping with homework, lending an ear to listen to their concerns, and showing up to cheer for your child’s sports team, just to name a few. So clearly, money is not everything, but it is often the “grease” that keeps the wheels turning in your children’s lives and plays a particularly significant role in post divorce parenting.
Providing for your child’s material needs should be a top priority for any parent. Coming to an understanding of the division of financial responsibilities and what should be considered reasonable expenses is tricky even for parents enjoying an intact relationship – and nearly impossible for those that are divorced.
Fortunately the family court system can take care of many of the basic monetary aspects of raising children, deciding who is responsible and to what degree. Unfortunately, the secular court system does not always take into consideration the higher cost of living within the average Jewish community. Private school education, special clothing for Shabbat and week long holiday celebrations, are fundamental aspects of our lives and considered a normal level of expectation for the Jewish family. Since the recommendations of the court do not necessarily coincide with our distinctive financial obligations, parents that adhere religiously to the legal guidelines set forth find that they have a deficit on their balance sheet each month, which in most cases must be absorbed by the custodial parent.
From my personal experience and that of other parents I know who have been the primary caregivers and custodial parent post divorce, it seems that there is often a strong correlation between one’s commitment to monetary support and the level of involvement on a whole in the children’s lives. Far more important than “cents,” is sensibility and sensitivity regarding the children needs.
One non-custodial parent that I know spends each of his children’s eighteenth birthdays making sure to file emancipation documents in order to sever his financial responsibility for their upkeep. Even if his children are still full time students living in their mom’s home, their father wants to ensure that he is not “obligated” beyond the letter of the law. As a result their mom has become not only their full time care provider, she is now expected to pick up what he dropped and provide for all of their financial needs as well. With his children “of age” and intuitive regarding family dynamics, it has ultimately affected their relationship with their father.
This does not mean to imply that it is not only fathers that act in a way that is “non-supportive.” In another case I personally know of, a non-custodial mom avoided paying child support altogether after she lost custody of her children. After the initial shock of not being her children’s primary caregiver, she eventually relocated and unfortunately became estranged from her children. She felt if she was not “getting” anything why should she be obligated to give anything. I have always believed that if she continued to provide some support financially, she may have been able to reconnect emotionally with her children at some point down the line, but since she avoided her financial responsibilities to them, at the end of the day her children felt abandoned by her since she did not even contribute to their basic necessities. These feelings are hard to get passed; even as her children grew into adulthood their relationship continues to be adversely affected and seemingly damaged beyond repair.
There is a strong connection for children with being taken care of financially so that their material needs are met, and feeling secure and emotionally whole. Those people who provide for the child are viewed as supportive; those who do not are viewed as having neglected their responsibilities towards their children; not only financially but their emotional responsibilities as well.
Most often unbalanced monetary support of the children is in direct relation to the discord between the former spouses leading to battles in the financial arena. “Power play” becomes their new method of communication, and money is used to control. Jealousy or feelings of hurt and abandonment that have not been worked through fuel the fire and exacerbate the issues. Ultimately it is the relationship between parent and child that suffers the most.
After living it from several perspectives, as a mom having sole custody of her children and in partnering in the raising of my stepchildren whom my husband supported financially and shared physical custody of, it is my conclusion that although finances should not be an indicator of the level of affection and love parents feel towards their children, “support” in the greater sense is. Children need to be cared for in every sense of the word, financially, physically and emotionally. The day your child is born, the day you become a parent is the day that obligation begins, and I have yet to meet a truly caring and “supportive” parent for whom those obligations have ended completely. Of course as our children reach adulthood and venture out on their own they need our support in different ways; but being supportive is the special way parents communicate love to their children.Yehudit Levinson
About the Author: Yehudit welcomes and encourages input and feedback on issues relating to the Blended Family and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.