web analytics
October 4, 2015 / 21 Tishri, 5776
At a Glance
Sponsored Post

Rubin Reports: Islamists Are Generally Winning But Not Everywhere and Not Inevitably

Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi

Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi
Photo Credit: Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90

There are, then, a number of important lessons here:

–Islam and revolutionary political Islamism are not identical. Islamists have a real advantage over liberal reformers in recruiting Muslims but Muslims often choose not to be Islamists. They can give their loyalty to a tribe, state, ethnic group, the idea of a moderate democratic alternative, or a traditionalism that mistrusts Islamism.

–Islamists are not fated to win everywhere. Each country is different.

–The weakness of reformers–including political incompetence, factionalism, and lack of funding—is as big a factor as the revolutionary Islamists’ strength.

–The next era in the Middle East will be dominated by the debate over whether Islamism is the way to go. Islamists will radicalize the regional scene, carry out terrorism at home and abroad, and inflict repression on their own people wherever they get power. But remember that even at the height of Arab nationalism—in the 1950s and 1960s—that movement inevitably produced Arab Muslim enemies, people who didn’t want to knuckle under to President Gamal Abdel Nasser’s Egypt or the Ba’th Party that ruled in Iraq and Syria.

Finally, it is precisely because a battle is going on—a battle for control over Islam; a battle for control over each country— that Western policy is important. That is precisely why Western policy should help liberal reformers, traditionalists, or pragmatic militaries, depending on specific circumstances, and not Islamists.

If Islamists were winning everywhere and no one could stop them, Western policy wouldn’t matter and the Obama Administration could claim that it is on the side of history—anti-American history, but still history. But because Ibish is basically correct, that policy is not only disastrous but also tragic.

About the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Rubin Reports: Islamists Are Generally Winning But Not Everywhere and Not Inevitably”

  1. Charlie Hall says:

    Ghadafi suppressed religion in a way that would be intolerable in a modern democracy. I had two Libyan doctors as students this semester, both religious Muslim women. They were glad to see him go and their families fought with the rebels — but they want a Libya with religious freedom, not religious repression.

    Worthy of note is that the secularists who are now in the opposition in Turkey also repressed religion there as well.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
US calls Arab terror in Jerusalem is a "tragic stabbing."
Politically Correct: US Condemns ‘Tragic Stabbings in Jerusalem’

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/rubin-reports/rubin-reports-islamists-are-generally-winning-but-not-everywhere-and-not-inevitably/2012/07/20/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: