web analytics
July 12, 2014 / 14 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim's Restaurant in Tiberias Restaurant in Tiberias Enriches Holocaust Survivors’ Wellbeing

The generosity of Mrs. Lee Steinberg of New York helped establish the Meir Panim Free Restaurant in Tiberias.



Daf Yomi


Daf-Yomi-logo

The Sons Stirred Within Her
‘The Fetus Is A Limb Of Its Mother’
(Temura 30b)

Many sugyos in our tractate involve the well-known difference of opinions as to whether “a fetus is a limb (yerech) of its mother” or a separate entity.

If a fetus is a separate entity, however, how is slaughtering a pregnant animal permitted? After all, we learned in Chullin that the Torah prohibits slaughtering a mother and its child on the same day (Vayikra 22:28). If a fetus is considered a limb of its mother, the question does not arise because then the slaughterer is only killing one animal. But if the fetus is a separate entity, isn’t the slaughterer violating the prohibition of oso v’es beno?

Life Or Limb

The Rambam seems to briefly address this question by writing, “It is permitted to slaughter a pregnant animal; the fetus is a limb of its mother” (Hilchos Shechitah 12:10). Two important conclusions seem to emerge from this ruling: 1) The halacha accords with the opinion that a fetus is a limb of its mother and 2) it is forbidden to slaughter a pregnant animal according to those who maintain that a fetus is a separate entity.

The problem is that neither of these two conclusions appear correct. First, the Rambam himself writes in another place that a fetus is not a limb of its mother (see Hilchos Isurei Mizbeiach 3:12 and Mahari Kurkus, ibid). And second, from the Gemara it seems evident that both opinions permit slaughtering a pregnant animal (Bava Kama 78b; see Responsa Beis Yitzchak, E.H. 1:54:7). The Rambam’s statement, then, seems doubly contradicted. Many poskim have tried to solve these contradictions, including the Chelkas Yoav who suggested a brilliant idea.

Oso V’es Bno

Why do those who maintain that a fetus is a separate entity allow slaughtering a pregnant animal? Because the entire argument regarding a fetus concerns a fetus that has actually been born. Once a calf is born, we discuss if its present status retroactively affects its previous status and gives it independent significance. But if it is never born, everyone agrees that the fetus was, and remains, a limb of its mother.

With this explanation, the Rambam’s statement is very simple. Since the fetus of a slaughtered pregnant animal will never be born, everyone agrees that it is a limb of its mother. Hence, the Rambam rules that the mother may be slaughtered. What about a fetus that is born? The Rambam does not discuss this case in this context (cited in Avnei Nezer, Y.D., 336:7; see also Chelkas Yoav, vol. II, p. 122, and Dovev Meisharim 1:26).

Why, though, does the Rambam issue a definitive ruling on slaughtering a pregnant animal when the Gemara never does? A few poskim offer a fascinating solution. The writings of the Geonim and Rishonim indicate that a serious disagreement took place between the Chachamim and the Karaites about slaughtering a pregnant animal. The Karaites contended that a fetus is considered “offspring” (beno), quoting the pasuk, “…and the sons (habanim) agitated inside her” (Bereishis 25:22). Hence, slaughtering a pregnant animal is forbidden due to the prohibition of oso v’es b’no. The Chachamim, however, led by Rabbi Meshulam bar Rabbi Klonimus (cited in HaEshkol, III, p. 70, and in the Albeck edition, II, p. 120, and ibid. in remark 3) rejected this opinion, arguing that the children whom Rivkah later bore are only called “sons” because of their future state.

No Separation Anxiety

The Rambam considered this argument when he wrote “It is permitted to slaughter a pregnant animal; a fetus is a limb of its mother.” The Rambam did not intend to rule on the famous dispute regarding the status of a fetus. Rather, he meant to rule like the Chachamim that neither of the two Talmudic opinions maintains that the fetus of a slaughtered pregnant mother is considered “offspring.” (See Beis Yitzchak, ibid; Ohr Sameiach on the Rambam, Hilchos Shechitah, ibid; Magiah on the ‘Itur, shaar 2, Hilchos Shechitah, 28; and Torah Sheleimah, Bereishis, 25:85.)

A Fetus Is An Eiver Of Its Mother

Indeed, in the original manuscripts of the Yad Hachazakah, the Rambam’s phrasing is “It is permitted to slaughter a pregnant animal; a fetus is an eiver (limb) of its mother.” The famous Talmudic disagreement is always framed as the question of whether “a fetus is a yerech of its mother.” Hence, it seems clear that the Rambam was simply refuting the Karaites’ opinion but had no intention of ruling on the famous Talmudic dispute whether a fetus is its mother yerech or not.

Meoros Hadaf Hayomi Newsletters are published by the Sochachover Kollel of Bnei Brak, led by Rabbi Chaim Dovid Kovalsky. Meoros Hadaf Hayomi Newsletters in Hebrew and/or English are available for simcha dedications as well as for yahrzeit, shloshim and other memorial occasions. They are distributed by e-mail, dafyomi@hadaf-yomi.com.

About the Author: RABBI YAAKOV KLASS, rav of Congregation K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush, Brooklyn, is Torah Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at yklass@jewishpress.com. RABBI GERSHON TANNENBAUM, rav of Congregation Bnai Israel of Linden Heights, Boro Park, Brooklyn, is the Director of Igud HaRabbanim – The Rabbinical Alliance of America.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Daf Yomi”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
An Islamic Jihadist in Gaza, eliminated by a rocket from an Israeli aircraft.
Hamas’ ‘Operation Death Wish’ vs. Israel’s Protective Edge
Latest Judaism Stories
Leff-071114

Sometimes when Chazal say that two different people are really one, they do not mean it literally, but rather figuratively.

Pinchas 10 Minute Parsha

The midrash says that Pinchas, (this parsha), and Eliyahu, prophet of Kings, are one and the same.

Lessons-Emunah-logo

The simple act of kindness should be the reward itself. Anything more in the form of a reward is gravy.

Business-Halacha-logo

“It is sometimes possible through hataras nedarim, nullification of vows,” replied Rabbi Dayan, “but it’s not simple for charity pledges.

The kohen gadol may not enter the Temple unless his hair is cut every seven days.

We need to understand why Moshe Rabbeinu decided to ask that his sons inherit his position after this new halacha was introduced.

Ancient Cities, Ancient Walls
(Megillah 3b-4a)

Question: I recently returned from a trip abroad and wanted to say HaGomel. When I mentioned this to the officers of my synagogue, however, they told me – as per the instructions of the synagogue’s rabbi – that I would have to wait until Shabbos to do so. I was not given any reason for this and did not wish to display my ignorance, so I quietly acquiesced. Can you please explain why I had to wait?

Name Withheld
(Via E-Mail)

Moshe served dual major roles for bnei Yisrael. He was their teacher and their leader.

An opinion recorded in the Talmud states that prayers correspond to the daily sacrifices offered in the Temple that are mentioned in this week’s portion (Berachot 26b, Numbers 28:4). It’s been argued that this opinion may be the conceptual base for our standardized prayer. Since sacrifices had detailed structure, our prayers also have a set text. […]

Is the fact that we can spend time with our families just a fringe benefit of Shabbos or an integral aspect?

Respect for basic human dignity is such a powerful concept that it overwhelms some areas of Jewish law.

If it is not prohibited when there is a purpose for inflicting the tza’ar, why was Bilam chastised for tza’ar ba’alei chaim?

Question: I recently returned from a trip abroad and wanted to say HaGomel. When I mentioned this to the officers of my synagogue, however, they told me – as per the instructions of the synagogue’s rabbi – that I would have to wait until Shabbos to do so. I was not given any reason for this and did not wish to display my ignorance, so I quietly acquiesced. Can you please explain why I had to wait?

Name Withheld
(Via E-Mail)

More Articles from Rabbi Yaakov Klass and Rabbi Gershon Tannenbaum
Daf-Yomi-logo

Ancient Cities, Ancient Walls
(Megillah 3b-4a)

Birchas Kohanim On A Fast Day
‘Because of Intoxication…’
(Taanis 26b)

A Siyum Validates It
‘Thereupon The Decrees Were Annulled’
(Ta’anis 18a)

A Unique Challenge
‘Tithe, You Shall Tithe…’
(Ta’anis 9a)

Pidyon Haben In The Afternoon?
‘…The First Reads Hallel Out Loud’
(Rosh Hashanah 32b)

The Shofar On Shabbos
‘Rosh Hashanah That Fell on Shabbos’
(Rosh Hashanah 29b)

Sanctified For Now And Thereafter
‘In Front of the Sun or Behind It?’
(Rosh Hashana 23b)

An Art Collector’s Dilemma!
‘Rabban Gamaliel Had The Form Of Various Moon Shapes…’
(Rosh Hashanah 24a)

    Latest Poll

    Israel's Iron Dome Anti-Missile System:





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/daf-yomi-24/2012/03/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: