Obama is a New Kind of Leftist
print
tell a friend
Photo Credit: The White House
Moreover, in contrast to the NNL, Marxists saw the “bourgeois” government as an inevitable enemy. Impossible to change it could only be overthrown. The NNL sought to take over that government and use it to force “revolution” from above. The Marxists focused on the proletariat; while working with some (mostly government workers’) trade unions, the NNL bases itself on certain elements of the upper middle class while trying to buy off crony capitalists and the poor, who Marx called the lumpenproletariat. Well, of course, the result is a disaster when an anti-capitalist regime takes over a capitalist system. How can the system do anything but crash? The pilots are motivated by something that blends deliberate suicide with incompetence, and an ideology that ensures a crash. And they will never ever get better because they are just uninterested in learning what to do that works.
So what are we dealing with here? A radical leftist movement pretending to be liberal, growing out of the New Left of the 1960s, painfully aware of how the far left miserably failed in American history, and trying to create a twenty-first century stealth leftism. The first step was to gain hegemony in the key institutions that created ideas, rather than the factories that created material goods. They succeeded brilliantly.
The next step was to shape millions of Americans, especially young Americans, to accept their ideas that the United States was a force for evil in the world; a failed society; a place of terrible racism and hatred for women; a country where the vast majority didn’t have a fair chance because the system was unfair. In fact, if you take away the varnish rhetoric, they argue that America is a virtual dictatorship of a small minority of wealthy people who just set everything up for their own convenience. Obviously this parallels both Marxist and non-Marxist historical leftism.
The fact that their description of America has so little to do with the actual country makes it all the more impressive that they’ve been able to sell this set of ideas. Having one of their indoctrinated products become president was a special bonus. That doesn’t mean Obama was backed by some conspiracy or singled out for highest office. There are thousands of such people who are in positions of power, including one-third of the Democrats in the House of Representatives. Obama just perfectly fit the needs of the moment.
Is Obama a Muslim? Of course not and there is no evidence that he is no matter how much you jump up and down and holler about it. On one side, Obama is—like his NNL colleagues–rather obviously a cynical atheist who has no serious religious belief.
On the other side, he certainly had close contact with Islam and functioned as a Muslim in Indonesia. It is worth mentioning that generally speaking Indonesia has about the most moderate form of Islam in the world. Note how in his autobiography, Obama describes his Muslim step-father’s tolerance for “pagan” Indonesian practices. This would be virtually unimaginable in any other country.
Coming from that experience, Obama fancies himself as an expert on Islam with a special rapport and sympathy to Muslims. His policy is a disaster because he refuses to recognize that non-al-Qaida Islamists are extremely anti-American, totalitarian, and anti-democratic. Does Obama want to help Islamists take power? In many cases, yes, but that isn’t because he’s a Muslim but because he falsely believes—encouraged by various “experts”—that this would tame them and they will like America and become democratic.
Has this kind of thinking happened before? Absolutely yes. In the 1950s, the U.S. government decided that Arab nationalists would be anti-Communist modernizers when they turned out to be bloodthirsty anti-American tyrants. In the early 1990s, both the U.S. and Israeli governments decided that helping Yasir Arafat would transform him into a statesman who just wanted to have his own country and settle down to fixing potholes.
Note that even if Obama were to be defeated in the election, the far left’s relative monopoly over mass media, academia, many schools, and much of publishing and entertainment would not be affected. The left-wing’s control over the Democratic Party might also well not be affected, because that would require a revolt by courageous people, further motivated by disastrous defeat, of which so far there is no sign whatsoever.
tell a friendAbout the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.
You might also be interested in:
You must log in to post a comment.
No Responses to “Obama is a New Kind of Leftist”
Loading ...
The Democratic Party and President Obama pretend to be for Israel for votes but l his actions have been the most anti-Israel in American history.
It is a lie.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz is an example of this type of propaganda that would make Goebels proud.
She says that the vote to take out Jerusalem was a technical error, and denies there was meaningful opposition to Jerusalem.
But Al Jazeera reports that the leader of Arab-Americans for Obama lobbied to take the language out.
Shultz has been caught red handed in brazen lies before, but she continues as DNC chairwoman because Jewish voters for Obama don't want to check out the facts.
Well said! Thank you!
The Democratic Party and President Obama pretend to be for Israel for votes but l his actions have been the most anti-Israel in American history.
It is a lie.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz is an example of this type of propaganda that would make Goebels proud.
She says that the vote to take out Jerusalem was a technical error, and denies there was meaningful opposition to Jerusalem.
But Al Jazeera reports that the leader of Arab-Americans for Obama lobbied to take the language out.
Shultz has been caught red handed in brazen lies before, but she continues as DNC chairwoman because Jewish voters for Obama don’t want to check out the facts.
The Democratic Party and President Obama pretend to be for Israel for votes but l his actions have been the most anti-Israel in American history.
It is a lie.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz is an example of this type of propaganda that would make Goebels proud.
She says that the vote to take out Jerusalem was a technical error, and denies there was meaningful opposition to Jerusalem.
But Al Jazeera reports that the leader of Arab-Americans for Obama lobbied to take the language out.
Shultz has been caught red handed in brazen lies before, but she continues as DNC chairwoman because Jewish voters for Obama don’t want to check out the facts.
The Democratic Party and President Obama pretend to be for Israel for votes but l his actions have been the most anti-Israel in American history.
It is a lie.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz is an example of this type of propaganda that would make Goebels proud.
She says that the vote to take out Jerusalem was a technical error, and denies there was meaningful opposition to Jerusalem.
But Al Jazeera reports that the leader of Arab-Americans for Obama lobbied to take the language out.
Shultz has been caught red handed in brazen lies before, but she continues as DNC chairwoman because Jewish voters for Obama don’t want to check out the facts.
Well said! Thank you!
Well said! Thank you!
Well said! Thank you!