web analytics
September 17, 2014 / 22 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

The Canada Factor: Policies for a Stronger Continent

A strong, united continent, governed by policies that work in the face of economic woes, rising Islamism, and the threat of terror against Israel and the West, is both our best defense and our best offense.
canada-us-flags3

Another solid argument for a tightened partnership is Canada’s “ethical Oil”, which would potentially suffer under Obama, but develop under Romney. During the debate Romney took aim at Obama for picking “losers” in the energy sector while turning his back on American fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. Romney mentioned the $90 billion that taxpayers were forced to pay — directed at funding wind, solar and other renewable-energy projects in the form of green energy — initiatives which included some high-profile failures, such as the now-bankrupt solar-panel maker Solyndra LLC.

Romney’s plan for energy independence is an offer to heal a Canada-U.S. rift, and promote jobs, freedom, and American security — as well as to reduce dependence upon Middle East oil. His strategy involves the U.S. approving the Keystone XL pipeline to carry Alberta oil to the U.S. Gulf Coast, as well as to lay additional pipelines to promote Canadian oil exports to the U.S. Both ideas have twice been rejected by Obama, whose aversion, prompted by the environmental movement, toward the oil sands, has resulted in Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper courting markets in Asia, particularly China.

As world leaders prepared to discuss climate change last year, Canada’s Minister of the Environment, Peter Kent, put proponents of the duplicitous Kyoto Treaty in their place. He robustly defended the Alberta oil sands in his argument of an “ethical’” and reliable energy source compared to continued reliance on Mid-east oil, and declared that he was not about to sign to any deals that mandated some countries reducing greenhouse gas emissions while others did not.

Foreign Affairs policy will be the focus of the October 22nd debate between Romney and Obama. U.S. intelligence agencies under the current administration have been praised in efforts to find and kill Osama bin Laden, but the War on Terror continues , as on display most recently in Libya, Yemen and Pakistan. It is current U.S. policy in the Middle East that needs a clear and resolute “reset” in the administration’s mishandling of foreign policy; not Russia.

Romney’s address, “The Mantle of Leadership,” to the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia unveiled a foreign policy that included a mandate to restore America to a position of global leadership. He referred to the struggle now shaking the entire Middle East, and the strained relationship between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and he accused Obama of emboldening Western adversaries, especially Iran. He said that to prevent war, America needs confidence in its cause, clarity of purpose, resolve of might and a strong military.

According to a Wall Street Journal article, Obama has allowed America’s leadership to atrophy: the economy is stuck in a “recovery;” a national debt has risen to record levels; the military is facing devastating cuts, and America’s values have been misapplied by a president who believes that weakness will win favor with America’s adversaries. Concerning Israel, Romney accused Obama of recently sending a clear diplomatic message by downgrading Israel from being America’s “closest ally” in the Middle East to being only “one of our closest allies,” while dismissing Israel’s concerns about Iran as mere “noise” that he prefers to “block out,” and declining to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Romney has warned that we need leaders who understand that keeping the peace requires American strength and steadfastness especially the kind that earned Canadian Prime Minister Harper the World Statesman award; in his acceptance speech, Harper did not hold back on supporting Israel or slamming Iran.

Conservative economic and foreign affairs policies have proven to be stabilizing to Canada in the midst of a global economic meltdown. Harper managed to shift Canada to the right and win a surprising majority. He gradually lowered sales and corporate taxes, outperformed other democracies, recovered lost jobs, stabilized the banking sector, avoided climate change legislation, increased military spending and extended Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan. A strong, united continent, governed by policies that work in the face of economic woes, rising Islamism, and the threat of terror against Israel and the West, is both our best defense and our best offense.

Originally published by the Gatestone Institute. David Cravit, author of Beyond Age Rage, also contributed to this article.

About the Author: Christine Williams is a Canadian journalist and award-winning interviewer. She is a regular blogger for NewsRealBlog.com, where her articles are frequently republished online at USA Today, FrontPage Magazine and Islamist Watch, among others.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “The Canada Factor: Policies for a Stronger Continent”

  1. Charlie Hall says:

    The irony is that Canada has maintained precisely the kinds of economic policies Mitt Romney strongly opposes: Stringent regulation of the financial sector, high taxes, and a strong social safety net including government-run universal health insurance. Canada also has a military that is less than 1/4 the per capita cost of the US military, and politicians do not use the Canadian Forces for pork barrel politics as it is done in the US (and which Mitt Romney implicitly endorsed recently, opposing defense cuts because they might increase unemployment as if non-defense cuts don't do the same). Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party are quite a bit to the Left of the Democratic Party in the US.

  2. Charlie Hall says:

    The irony is that Canada has maintained precisely the kinds of economic policies Mitt Romney strongly opposes: Stringent regulation of the financial sector, high taxes, and a strong social safety net including government-run universal health insurance. Canada also has a military that is less than 1/4 the per capita cost of the US military, and politicians do not use the Canadian Forces for pork barrel politics as it is done in the US (and which Mitt Romney implicitly endorsed recently, opposing defense cuts because they might increase unemployment as if non-defense cuts don't do the same). Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party are quite a bit to the Left of the Democratic Party in the US.

  3. Debbie Hall says:

    Great comment, Charlie.

  4. Canada does not need a strong military,or a defense budget,the USA protects them. If our military was cut to their size the USA would not last very long,is that what you want,are you willing to take that gamble?

  5. Debbie Hall says:

    Canada also doesn't meddle because of an oil lobby, which would greatly reduce a country's need for a strong military.

  6. The Canadian system does work well but it is a rare exception.

  7. Charlie Hall says:

    "Canada also doesn't meddle because of an oil lobby"

    Canada is an oil exporter, thanks to its smaller population. (The US actually produces more crude oil.)

    "Canada does not need a strong military,or a defense budget,the USA protects them."

    Partly true and partly false. True because Canada is a NATO member. The US spends more on its military than any other NATO country. False because the US does not patrol the Canadian Arctic, which is almost defenseless. This is not a big issue right now, but is global warming makes the Northwest Passage open more of the year, this could become one. (The US also makes a point of not accepting Canada's claim of sovereignty over the NWP. Personally I think Canada has a better case here.)

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
PLO / PA / Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas.
PA Unity Government Not Unified
Latest Indepth Stories

Rather than serving as a deterrent against terrorist attacks, Israel’s military strength and capabilities are instead looked at as an unfair advantage in the asymmetrical war in which it finds itself.

Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, former Field Marshal and Minister of Defense

Sisi:”The religious nature of the Middle East creates challenges for the governing authorities.”

A Gaza building, reportedly used by Hamas, destroyed by the IDF on August 26, 2014.

For too long the media and international community have been preaching that “Palestinians” bear no responsibility for the consequences of their decisions and they are passive victims of the conflict.

Iron Dome intercepted over 1,000 rockets aimed at Israel with a success rate of over 90% in 2014

We talked about the responsibility that comes with the pen, its potential to influence and inspire.

Amnesty International:The crippling of the power station was “collective punishment of Palestinians”

Originally scheduled to be held elsewhere, the hotel canceled, pressured by local missionary groups

It’s likely that some of the rebel factions, including US clients, have indeed made pacts with ISIS

Imam Tafsirli of the Harlem Islamic center: “You cannot be a Muslim without believing in Jesus”

If simple fuel choice were implemented, the power of petroleum and those who sell it would cease.

Value of IS: It enables people to see the place to which all other Islamist fascism is headed.

“When Frank does something he does it well and you don’t have to worry about dotting the i’s or crossing the t’s.”

President Obama: “ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones the killing of innocents”

he time of the Uman pilgrimage is upon us, and we dare not ignore the opportunity to highlight the danger.

More Articles from Christine Williams
Christians in the Middle East

“Christ at the Checkpoint” conference was a “who’s who of the new anti-Israel narrative.”

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Blaming America and appealing to a presumed guilt will not solve the problem of Muslim radicals wishing to infiltrate, dominate, Islamize and kill Western citizens.

The heat being generated from the Keystone controversy may well have had an influence upon Obama’s gaffe in comparing U.S.-Canada relations to Israel-Palestinian relations.

Building U.S.-Canada relations is more urgent than ever, both economically and in foreign affairs. If America intends to keep its advantage as a superpower, it will greatly help to ally with its neighbor, Canada. While Canada has depended upon the U.S. historically as the stronger military might, it has, under a Conservative Government, demonstrated global leadership in economic policy and foreign affairs. Given the rise of economic superpowers such as China and India, and the challenges from our enemies, such as Islamists, a strong foreign policy and a functional economy are key.

Despite the news of Canada’s decision and Baird’s justification for breaking diplomatic ties with Iran, much more action needs to be taken by Western nations. For example putting Hizbollah on the EU’s terror list.

A tight, organized network of Iranian terrorists seems to be using elementary schools, universities and government institutions — not to mention manipulating the multicultural system — to promote its messages of propaganda and hate, apparently with the ultimate goal of conquering the “infidel.”

The drive to have the Church of the Nativity recognized as a global heritage site is nothing short of offensive. Christians have been driven out of their ancestral lands; Palestinians have shown nothing but hostility to both Christians and Jews. Moreover, Christ himself was a Jew.

The United Church of Canada Working Group’s objectives do not even take into account the Jihadist call to war against Israel , and children being taught in Palestinian schools to hate and kill Jews. This hatred has nothing to do with the so-called “occupation,” as Palestinian children are indoctrinated to believe, but is instead fuelled by Israel having a different ideology of true Democracy and Human Rights in a region where most leaders are hostile to both.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-canada-factor-policies-for-a-stronger-continent/2012/10/15/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: