web analytics
March 29, 2015 / 9 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


NY Times Censors Terror Debate

Vanguard of American liberalism accepts, then rejects Investigative Project on Terrorism ad outlining link between radical Islam, terror
New York Times

New York Times
Photo Credit: Serge Attal/Flash90

The New York Times, the vanguard of liberal America, has “become complicit in a stealth jihad against free speech in the United States undertaken by Islamists and their sympathizers who masquerade as “civil rights” groups,” according to the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

In a long article on the organization website, IPT founder Steven Emerson says the group recently bought a full-page advocacy ad in the print edition of the Times calling for for awareness of the Islamist connection to a majority of terror attacks and criticising the United States government for ignoring the threat posed by radical Muslims.

At the last minute, however, the Times ordered IPT to insert the word “radical” before the term “Islamist groups,” so that it read, “Stop the radical Islamist groups from undermining America’s security, liberty and free speech.”

“An ‘Islamist’ is not simply an individual who privately observes Islam as his faith. An Islamist is an individual who blurs the ideological lines between personal religion and the nation state — a boundary upheld as one of America’s founding principles and sustained in the First Amendment — to foster a governmental system that relies upon the supremacy of Islam.

“Islamic,” on the other hand, is an adjective that describes an idea or element derived from or inspired by Islam. Islamists promote an Islamic agenda, though some do it more subtly than others,” Emerson wrote.

Emerson accused groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) of using the catch-all epithet “Islamophobe” as a smokescreen for “civil rights,” when in fact the umbrella organization serves the interests of Hamas, Hezbollah and fine, upstanding citizens of the world such as Yousef Qaradawi, spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

To discern whether or not Qaradawi is a terrorist, it is best to let him speak for himself.

“Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers,” Qaradawi told al-Jazeera TV in 2010.

Emerson and others continually stress that they do not view Islam as a problem, but rather radical Islam. As Daniel Pipes says, “I have great respect for the Islam that provides solace and spiritual meaning for a billion people around the world. But radical Islam is a murderous, terrorst entity that threatens the very foundations of our society. We must fight radical Islam at all costs.”

Emerson stressed that America is not at war with Muslims or with Islam,but he warned about attempts to censor discussion of the connection between radical Islam and terrorism.

“The censorship of free speech by Islamist groups and their media apologists continues to prevent America from addressing the core threat of radical Islam.

“Recognizing reality is not an attack on Islam or Muslims. Those who say otherwise are the ones of whom we — and, particularly, those in the media such as the NYT — should be wary,” Emerson wrote.

About the Author: Meir is a news writer for JewishPress.com - and he loves his job.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

15 Responses to “NY Times Censors Terror Debate”

  1. Strange how they don’t use the dictionary ? rad·i·cal [rad-i-kuhl] Show IPA
    adjective
    1. of or going to the root or origin; fundamental: a radical difference.
    2. thoroughgoing or extreme, especially as regards change from accepted or traditional forms: a radical change in the policy of a company.
    3. favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms: radical ideas; radical and anarchistic ideologues.
    4. forming a basis or foundation.
    5. existing inherently in a thing or person: radical defects of character.

  2. Muhd, you’ve been lied to and indoctrinated. And by your comment, it’s quite clear that all Muslims (Islamists) are terrorists. You’re a hateful person and that’s why peace can’t exist. Even if we were all Muslims you kill each other (Sunni’s against Shiites) – you’re disgraceful! There will never be peace as long as Islam exists.

  3. Muhd, you’ve been lied to and indoctrinated. And by your comment, it’s quite clear that all Muslims (Islamists) are terrorists. You’re a hateful person and that’s why peace can’t exist. Even if we were all Muslims you kill each other (Sunni’s against Shiites) – you’re disgraceful! There will never be peace as long as Islam exists.

  4. Muhd, you’ve been lied to and indoctrinated. And by your comment, it’s quite clear that all Muslims (Islamists) are terrorists. You’re a hateful person and that’s why peace can’t exist. Even if we were all Muslims you kill each other (Sunni’s against Shiites) – you’re disgraceful! There will never be peace as long as Islam exists.

  5. That sounds exactly like ALL of Islam not just the imaginary so-called radical sector – it’s all radical. @Muhd, Facebook was designed by a Jew so if you’re Muslim you have the right to stop using Facebook!

  6. That sounds exactly like ALL of Islam not just the imaginary so-called radical sector – it’s all radical. @Muhd, Facebook was designed by a Jew so if you’re Muslim you have the right to stop using Facebook!

  7. That sounds exactly like ALL of Islam not just the imaginary so-called radical sector – it’s all radical. @Muhd, Facebook was designed by a Jew so if you’re Muslim you have the right to stop using Facebook!

  8. They are guilty of journalistic terrorism.

  9. They are guilty of journalistic terrorism.

  10. They are guilty of journalistic terrorism.

  11. Ken Man says:

    Islamist, Muslim what’s the difference ? They willingly sacrifice their children on the alter of martyrdom that’s pretty extreme

  12. we destroy you as you destroy other. Its time your against pakistan nation . So keep your mind we are necluer power nation. Not phalsteen people, one day come when killed all jewish

  13. In your dream hitler come every day . And when you cry haha , you keep your mind hitler come again but this time muslim leader are like hitler.

  14. …hence flying planes into buildings is the new form of debate… ;)

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
obamatargetiran-275x167
Iranian Journalist Defects, Says US Team Speaking for Iran
Latest News Stories
obamatargetiran-275x167

“The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with
other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal.”

Aftermath of Saudi air strike on Yemen.

Saudi Arabia withdraws personnel from Aden. Iran calls Saudi strike a “strategic mistake.”

“The tone of #US officials’ background comments on #Iran talks is getting progressively more dreary, like the weather in #Lausanne,” Associate Press reporter Matt Lee tweeted Saturday night. Lee is a veteran journalist who has a keen eye and ear that cuts through the double talk and dishonest smiling faces of American diplomats. If he […]

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

It is a long tradition in the Muslim world never to agree to anything at an agreed time.

Hamas test fired a rocket on Saturday, the rocket landed within the Gaza Strip.

Israel was aware of the report’s impending release and did not object.

The PA hasn’t changed anything on their end, so why did Netanyahu suddenly change his policy?

Obama’s “two-state” phobia shows how much he and his experts do not understand the Middle East.

Kosher for Passover? Depends who you ask.

The main suspect confessed to passing on information to Syria through the Internet.

Has anyone asked Obama why Netanyahu should even think about agreeing to a Palestinian Authority country?

A U.S. Air Force F-15 warplane dropped approximately 60,000 leaflets over the Syrian city of Raqaa to discourage people from joining the Islamic State (ISIS), the Pentagon revealed Thursday. The “Military Information Support Operations,” propaganda campaign was carried out last week and was the first time the United States has used the tactic in Syria. […]

Israel reportedly wants to change the names to Hebrew, which would affront Muslim sensitivities.

The non-binding vote approves funds for imposing sanctions if Iran violates a deal.

More Articles from Meir Halevi Siegel
Economics Minister and Bayit Yehudi chairman Naftali Bennett

Jewish Home leader blocks exhibition of dead bodies citing Jewish tradition to honor the dead; NIF objects.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Cabinet holds special session in Ashkelon, faces criticism from local residents, officials over lack of aid package

For two-and-a-half years, residents of the Golan Heights understood that domestic interests in Syria would keep war away from them.

4,000 dunams in G’vaot area declared state land, will open door for large construction project.

With Judeophobic attacks spiking around United Kingdom, local Jews say not enough done to enforce hate crime laws

Drug dealers suspected of aiding Hezbollah make inroads into Israel; smuggling attempts also included Jordan, Syria

Only time PLO seems interested in justice for Palestinians is when Israel is involved

For years, Binyamin Netanyahu’s views on negotiating with terrorists, and on negotiating under fire have been clear: In his defining treatise on the subject Terrorism: How the West Can Win, Netanyahu spelled out clear guidelines for dealing with the scourge of attacks on civilians. Amongst other principles, the then up-and-coming Likud leader said clearly that terrorists must […]

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/ny-times-censors-terror-debate/2014/06/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: