web analytics
October 20, 2014 / 26 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Memo to Obama: Mid-East Peace in 1 Hour or your Money Back


peace dove

Photo Credit: Yori Yanover

Does this mean that there are no genuine, voluntary terrorists out there, acting only on their beliefs and not getting paid by anyone to do it?

Sure, if one guy goes crazy and pulls out a knife on people in the street, he might be acting alone. But as soon as you start talking about car bombs, suicide bombers, ambushes, roadside explosives, there’s no way to get these things done without coordination and organization, and those cost a lot of money. So much money, in fact, that only national governments are able to foot the bill.

THE PROBLEM WITH OSLO

I told you earlier that the first failed attempt of a two-state solution, in 1947, was followed by another one, in 1993. It was known as the Oslo Accords, because it was signed in Oslo, Norway.

The Oslo Accords were a terrible idea. They were not at all an honest attempt to establish long-lasting peace between Arabs and Jews. Instead, they schemed to keep the Arabs under the control of a team of outside gangsters, paid by Israel.

The Oslo Accords placed the Arabs in the disputed territories under the control of gangsters, paid by Israel.

The Oslo Accords placed the Arabs in the disputed territories under the control of gangsters, paid by Israel.

In Oslo, Israel inflicted on the Arabs a permanent policy of Divide and Conquer, sentencing them to a slow and debilitating decline. So far, unfortunately, the Israeli plan has been working. One half of the Palestinians have been reduced to poverty. All of them are living in constant fear of violence, without the most elementary rights which you and I take for granted.

At the root of the Oslo Accords was the old Israeli yearning to rid themselves of the Arab presence, once and for all. We don’t want to fight you, we don’t want to deal with you, we don’t want to know you.

Have you seen the protective wall Israel erected alongside the West Bank and Gaza? The same wishful thinking forged both that wall and the Oslo Accords: Please, just make the people on the other side disappear.

Here's the security wall Israel erected alongside the West Bank and Gaza. It turns both sides into prisons.

Here’s the security wall Israel erected alongside the West Bank and Gaza. It turns both sides into prisons.

Remember how I called the British repugnant, for their policy of Divide and Conquer? Can you imagine how I feel about the Israelis who invented the Oslo Accords?

THE FIRST INTIFADA

intifada_sm

Something remarkable happened in Israel or Palestine between 1987 and 1993: the First Intifada, or uprising, against Israeli rule in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which Israel had conquered from Jordan and Egypt in 1967.

Those territories are mistakenly called “occupied,” which would suggest that they were taken away from their rightful owners. But both Jordan and Egypt controlled those areas from 1948 to 1967 without widespread, formal international recognition of their ownership. Legally, those were no-man’s lands, and have remained so under Israel’s rule, with the exception of East Jerusalem, which Israel did annex. I prefer to use the less charged term “disputed territories,” which acknowledges the disagreement over who should rule them, without castigating Israel unfairly as an occupier.

The Intifada uprising began in the Jabalia refugee camp near Gaza, and spread like wildfire throughout the Gaza strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The Palestinians declared general strikes, boycotted Israeli products, refused to pay taxes, painted anti-Israeli graffiti everywhere, set up barricades, demonstrated in the streets, threw rocks at Israeli soldiers, then went on to hurl Molotov cocktails and hand grenades, and attacked hundreds of Israeli civilians with guns and explosives.

In the six years of the first Intifada, some 1,100 Palestinians and 160 Israelis lost their lives. Another 1,000 Palestinians were killed by their neighbors for suspicion of collaborating with Israel.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT THE ARABS? (I)

About the Author: Yori Yanover has been a working journalist since age 17, before he enlisted and worked for Ba'Machane Nachal. Since then he has worked for Israel Shelanu, the US supplement of Yedioth, JCN18.com, USAJewish.com, Lubavitch News Service, Arutz 7 (as DJ on the high seas), and the Grand Street News. He has published Dancing and Crying, a colorful and intimate portrait of the last two years in the life of the late Lubavitch Rebbe, (in Hebrew), and two fun books in English: The Cabalist's Daughter: A Novel of Practical Messianic Redemption, and How Would God REALLY Vote.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

16 Responses to “Memo to Obama: Mid-East Peace in 1 Hour or your Money Back”

  1. Absalon Romero says:

    Una estrategia inovadora y fundamentada en principios espirituales. Excelente reflexión!

  2. David Willig says:

    And what happens if at the first election, they change their mind and vote to end Democracy? It has happened in other Arab countries. So two amendments to your plan. Any one claiming Israeli citizenship must sign a document to that effect, A list of new Arab citizens will be published once a week.
    Second, all rights EXCEPT the right to vote, which will be phased on over a 50 year period. Ara voting will start at age 68 and go down every year, till 50 years from now it will be age 18 for everyone. Theis will let people get used to Democracy and the benefits of equal rights. Or they are free to leave.

  3. So many errors on first page alone.

    "Back in 1947, the official count was 1.6 million Arabs and 600 thousand Jews. That’s when the first attempt was made to divide the land into two states" That was the SECOND division of the land – Jordan was already created from the Mandate to form an Arab state.

    "When, in 1947, the United Nations of the world decided to give the Jews a homeland in part of Israel or Palestine" Wrong again. The UN voted to END the Mandate – the decision to form a homeland for the Jews was made in 1920 by the San Remo Treaty and not the League of Nations, and placed into formal international law by the League of Nations in 1922. The UN had nothing to do with it.

    The UK did not steal the eastern 3/4 of the Mandate for the Arabs until 1923 not 1921 as stated.

    We did not get along before the Mandate – Jews were subject to pograms and extra taxes, nor did we have any rights. Again you take extreme license with the facts.

    The Arabs that occupy Judea and Samaria have JORDANIAN citizenship. We have a peace treaty with Jordan where they renounced their claim to that territory but left their illegal colonists. International law states that they MUST take them back.

  4. The Jews were brought back to their land by the hand of God. Do not sin against God by trying to give away his land. Without God's blessing no permanent peace will come from that action. Month by month, and week by week. The middle east spins more out of control. Iran continues unwavering on it’s march in the development of nuclear weapons and Assad the dictator of Syria is still in power. Current intelligence seems uncertain of when Iran will get the bomb and Israel cannot afford to gamble with this. Assad of Syria looks like he may be willing to use weapons of mass destruction against his own people and against near by nations as well. If this situation does not drastically change soon for the better, I believe the war in Isaiah Chapter 17 will likely take place. Damascus Syria would be destroyed. The worlds economy would likely collapse as a result and could usher in a one world government movement. I wrote a small 6 page book that outlines what I believe the Bible states will take place soon as well as the potential trends I see at this time. I don’t accept donations and it’s free. It’s a short read. I encourage you to have a look: http://www.booksie.com/religion_and_spirituality/book/richard_b_barnes/after-the-rapture-whats-next.

  5. Gil Gilman says:

    It is difficult to ascertain which dance has the most wishful thinking behind it, yours or the perpetual two-step, but it was an enjoyable read, nonetheless. Regarding any factual errors, let us first inject meaning into the text which was not there to begin with, and then argue with it.

  6. I see the solution. Make Israel a state in the United States like New Jersey.
    Is that what you are suggesting.

  7. Charlie Hall says:

    When did you become a onestater?

  8. Yori Yanover says:

    Always have bee. One Jewish state with equal rights for all.

  9. Nice thought but not very realistic.

  10. Yori Yanover says:

    Harold Pomerantz — You're suggesting that a 2-state solution with settlement removal and half of Jerusalem given back to the Arabs is realistic?

  11. Charlie Hall says:

    How is your proposal different from the one state proposal that the BDSers or the Hadash party propose?

  12. Yori Yanover says:

    What happens if the Arabs of Hoboken decide to vote to stop democracy in New Jersey? There are inherent defenses in the system to stop that. There are special majority requirements for constitutional changes.

    But also, we should include things I didn't mention in the article. A friend of mine sent me this response, which might answer your concern:

    I agree with the general direction of Yori's plan: One Jewish State Solution, With Equal Human, Civil and Communal Rights For All.
    However, there are 3 points without which this state will quickly turn into the PLO model of a "democratic, secular state" dominated by an Arab majority, or even an Islamist Caliphate ruled by Hamas and other radicals.

    1) "Equal Human, Civil and Communal Rights For All" – should clearly exclude any National Rights (or claims), such as self-determination, from all Non-Jews. The exclusive national rights of the Jews in the One State of Isael must be based on the Liberal principle of defending the Jewish minority against the tyranny of the majority in the Middle-East.

    2) A constitutional mechanism should protect the above rights by according the Jewish communities a permanent majority in the Knesset's upper chamber (as per my proposal titled "The Community Democracy") and some practical security safeguards in Jewish hands.

    3) The refugees issue should be resolved through a regional convention, where all claims against Mid-Eastern governments must be discussed – including personal and communal claims of nearly 900,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries, thousands of refugees from the current civil war in Syria and more.
    Ignoring these points may turn your lovely vision into a dangerous trap.

    Ehud

  13. Noah Farbstein says:

    Yori. your one-state solution looks familiar, and almost appears to be in line with some of Israel's largest detractorsseems including Tony Judt, Virginia Tilley and even the wakko Norman Finkelstein.

    Assuming, as appears recently to be the case, that Jewish population growth actually is far greater than that of the Arabs, Israel should annex all of the so-called "disputed" territories and require allegiance by all citizens, both Arab and Israeli.

    However, if we are in the minority, I don't believe a simple agreement by the Arabs as to the Jewish nature of Israel would suffice, especially under your proposal, as the Arab world (and the Palestinians) never truly has accepted the legitimacy of Israel, in any form, as the Jewish National Homeland. This continues to be demonstrated by the rerfusal of Hamas, the popularly elected government in Gaza, and other radical Islamic fundamentalists, such as Islamic Jihad, to accept Israel’s existence.

    More alarming is your failure to highlight the the nature this one-state alternative that you seem to advocate (what would the new state look like, aside from 'lots of smiles?'). Iin my opinion, under the later scenario, it merely would replace a democratic state with yet another Arab Nation state. Most likely, one that is radically Islamic and at best it would see the subjugation of the Jewish minority, but more likely its cleansing. In fact, one need not look any further than the treatment of Coptics in Egypt, woman and minorities in Gaza, and Israel circa 1920/21, 1929, 1936-1939, etc.

    Further, even Benny Morris, one of Israel’s most well-known historians and an authority on this topic, has reversed course and blames the failure of the peace process on the Palestinians, which he claims do not seek a two-state solution. Instaed, they openly endorse a binational state with an Arab majority (e.g. Sharia Law) in all of the land of Israel.

    In fact, Morris, with whom I fully agree, believes that the Palestinians, including the PLO/PA, never truly accepted a two-state solution (even in the 1990s), as clearly stated in their charter (“…from the river to the sea.”). This might explain why recently they have placed even more restrictive preconditions on negotiations with Israel, such as no construction in Jerusalem on land owned by Israel, and which never was a consideration in previous negotiations.

  14. Noah Farbstein says:

    Yori, your one-state solution looks familiar, and almost appears to be in line with some of Israel's largest detractors, including Tony Judt, Virginia Tilley and even the wakko Norman Finkelstein.

    Assuming, as appears recently to be the case, that Jewish population growth actually is far greater than that of the Arabs, Israel should annex all of the so-called "disputed" territories and require allegiance by all citizens, both Arab and Jew.

    However, if we are in the minority, I don't believe a simple agreement by the Arabs as to the Jewish nature of Israel would suffice, especially under your proposal, as the Arab world (and the Palestinians) never truly has accepted the legitimacy of Israel, in any form, as the Jewish National Homeland. This continues to be demonstrated by the rerfusal of Hamas, the popularly ele…cted government in Gaza, and other radical Islamic fundamentalists, such as Islamic Jihad, to accept Israel’s existence.

    More alarming is your failure to highlight the the nature this one-state alternative that you seem to advocate (what would the new state look like, aside from 'lots of smiles?'). Iin my opinion, under the later scenario, it merely would replace a democratic state with yet another Arab Nation state. Most likely, one that is radically Islamic and at best it would see the subjugation of the Jewish minority, but more likely its cleansing. In fact, one need not look any further than the treatment of Coptics in Egypt, woman and minorities in Gaza, and Israel circa 1920/21, 1929, 1936-1939, etc.

    Further, even Benny Morris, one of Israel’s most well-known historians and an authority on this topic, has reversed course and blames the failure of the peace process on the Palestinians, which he claims do not seek a two-state solution. Instaed, they openly endorse a binational state with an Arab majority (e.g. Sharia Law) in all of the land of Israel.

    In fact, Morris, with whom I fully agree, believes that the Palestinians, including the PLO/PA, never truly accepted a two-state solution (even in the 1990s), as clearly stated in their charter (“…from the river to the sea.”). This might explain why recently they have placed even more restrictive preconditions on negotiations with Israel, such as no construction in Jerusalem on land owned by Israel, and which never was a consideration in previous negotiations.

  15. Noah Farbstein says:

    Yori, your one-state solution looks familiar, and almost appears to be in line with some of Israel's largest detractors, including Tony Judt, Virginia Tilley and even the wakko Norman Finkelstein.

    Assuming, as appears recently to be the case, that Jewish population growth actually is far greater than that of the Arabs, Israel should annex all of the so-called "disputed" territories and require allegiance by all citizens, both Arab and Jew.

    However, if we are in the minority, I don't believe a simple agreement by the Arabs as to the Jewish nature of Israel would suffice, especially under your proposal, as the Arab world (and the Palestinians) never truly has accepted the legitimacy of Israel, in any form, as the Jewish National Homeland. This continues to be demonstrated by the rerfusal of Hamas, the popularly ele…cted government in Gaza, and other radical Islamic fundamentalists, such as Islamic Jihad, to accept Israel’s existence.

    More alarming is your failure to highlight the the nature this one-state alternative that you seem to advocate (what would the new state look like, aside from 'lots of smiles?'). Iin my opinion, under the later scenario, it merely would replace a democratic state with yet another Arab Nation state. Most likely, one that is radically Islamic and at best it would see the subjugation of the Jewish minority, but more likely its cleansing. In fact, one need not look any further than the treatment of Coptics in Egypt, woman and minorities in Gaza, and Israel circa 1920/21, 1929, 1936-1939, etc.

    Further, even Benny Morris, one of Israel’s most well-known historians and an authority on this topic, has reversed course and blames the failure of the peace process on the Palestinians, which he claims do not seek a two-state solution. Instaed, they openly endorse a binational state with an Arab majority (e.g. Sharia Law) in all of the land of Israel.

    In fact, Morris, with whom I fully agree, believes that the Palestinians, including the PLO/PA, never truly accepted a two-state solution (even in the 1990s), as clearly stated in their charter (“…from the river to the sea.”). This might explain why recently they have placed even more restrictive preconditions on negotiations with Israel, such as no construction in Jerusalem on land owned by Israel, and which never was a consideration in previous negotiations.

  16. Noah Farbstein says:

    Yori, your one-state solution looks familiar, and almost appears to be in line with some of Israel's largest detractorsseems including Tony Judt, Virginia Tilley and even the wakko Norman Finkelstein.

    Assuming, as appears recently to be the case, that Jewish population growth actually is far greater than that of the Arabs, Israel should annex all of the so-called "disputed" territories and require allegiance by all citizens, both Arab and Jew.

    However, if we are in the minority, I don't believe a simple agreement by the Arabs as to the Jewish nature of Israel would suffice, especially under your proposal, as the Arab world (and the Palestinians) never truly has accepted the legitimacy of Israel, in any form, as the Jewish National Homeland. This continues to be demonstrated by the rerfusal of Hamas, the popularly ele…cted government in Gaza, and other radical Islamic fundamentalists, such as Islamic Jihad, to accept Israel’s existence.

    More alarming is your failure to highlight the the nature this one-state alternative that you seem to advocate (what would the new state look like, aside from 'lots of smiles?'). Iin my opinion, under the later scenario, it merely would replace a democratic state with yet another Arab Nation state. Most likely, one that is radically Islamic and at best it would see the subjugation of the Jewish minority, but more likely its cleansing. In fact, one need not look any further than the treatment of Coptics in Egypt, woman and minorities in Gaza, and Israel circa 1920/21, 1929, 1936-1939, etc.

    Further, even Benny Morris, one of Israel’s most well-known historians and an authority on this topic, has reversed course and blames the failure of the peace process on the Palestinians, which he claims do not seek a two-state solution. Instaed, they openly endorse a binational state with an Arab majority (e.g. Sharia Law) in all of the land of Israel.

    In fact, Morris, with whom I fully agree, believes that the Palestinians, including the PLO/PA, never truly accepted a two-state solution (even in the 1990s), as clearly stated in their charter (“…from the river to the sea.”). This might explain why recently they have placed even more restrictive preconditions on negotiations with Israel, such as no construction in Jerusalem on land owned by Israel, and which never was a consideration in previous negotiations.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Aerial view of Yemenite Village of HaShiloach, Old City of Jerusalem and Mt. of Olives.
Jews to Double Presence in Old Yemenite Village of Shiloach, Silwan
Latest Indepth Stories
Arab children look at pictures of two of a kind - Arafat and Barghouti.

What was the world reaction to a relatively light blockade of Gaza compared to the deliberate killing of Jews and destruction of Israel? A rebuke at the nature of the collective punishment on all of the people in Gaza. Consider the Sayreville, NJ case again. Imagine the football team, school and community participated in all […]

Jordan's King Abdullah

The Arab Spring has challenged Jordan with the task of gradual reform with regard to its monarchy.

The Kinneret/Sea of Galilee

Israel offered Syria the entire Golan Heights, only to find that the Syrians were demanding MORE!

Bibeye doctor

Israeli hasbara too can be described at best as pathetic, at worst non existent.

A ‘good news’ story from the Nepal avalanche disaster to warm your heart. Take out your Kleenex.

Journalists see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as morality play: Israel=evil; Palestine=innocent

Warsaw Ghetto: At its height, the Nazis walled in some 500,000 Jews within the1.3 square mile area.

While police officers face dangers every day on the job, Jews also face danger in their daily lives.

Carter developed a fondness for Arafat believing “they were both ordained to be peacemakers by God”

If Hamas is ISIS, the world asks, why didn’t Israel destroy it given justification and opportunity?

That key is the disarming of Hamas and the demilitarization of Gaza – as the U.S., EU, and others agreed to in principle at the end of Operation Protective Edge.

We have no doubt there are those who deeply desire to present themselves as being of a gender that is not consistent with their anatomy, and we take no joy in the pain and embarrassment they suffer.

Does it not seem ironic that just on the day all of Israel is joyously celebrating another year of having concluded the public reading of the entire Pentateuch, we must mournfully and even tearfully commemorate the death of the individual who imparted to us God’s Torah in the first place?

Why is “Palestine” worthier of “statehood recognition” than ISIS, another terrorist gang seeking it?

More Articles from Yori Yanover
rain ATM

A Jerusalem woman is trying to hold on to her umbrella while withdrawing some cash at a Meah Shearim ATM, Sunday, March 9, 2014. The rain appeared out of the blue (which is how rain should), after a warm week that started to feel like summer. Well, it don’t feel like summer no more. Last […]

Rabbi Meir Mazuz (seen visiting a synagogue in Crown Heights, Brooklyn) declared in a public Internet psak that it is legal for a Jew to go up to temple Mount.

Needless to say, Shas, the Haredi Sefardi party, is not happy.

“The only difference between this world and the time of Meshiach is our bondage to the gentile kingdoms.”

Here’s the Israeli Navy boat INS Hanit arriving in Eilat on Saturday, March 8, 2014, after capturing the Klos C, which was carrying dozens of advanced Iranian-supplied weapons made in Syria and intended for Palestinian guerrillas in the Gaza Strip. Here’s Israeli Navy Commander Vice Admiral Ram Rotberg speaking with the INS Hanit soldiers in […]

Pat Condell has a new video out, so, sit back, have fun. By the way, Message to Offended Muslims should not be confused with Message to Off Handed Muslims. Also, I’d love to hear what he has to say about Haredim.

The description that came with this picture says: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with American actor Bette Midler during an event at the house of Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan in Hollywood on March 6, 2014. But Bette Midler is not really an actor, she’s a singer who made movies for the LGBT community and […]

We will shut them up in the campuses, we will shut them up in the high schools, we will shut them up at the 92nd St. Y.

An Israeli female soldier (because they’re better at removing babies from their homes) evacuates a baby from a settlement in Judea and Samaria some time in the recent past. I’m thinking, if the baby was angry enough, couldn’t he evacuate in return, right there in her arms? Imagine the same picture, except with a settler […]

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/memo-to-obama-mid-east-peace-in-1-hour-or-your-money-back/2013/03/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: