web analytics
July 24, 2014 / 26 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Mayo on Milah

There have been venomous campaigns against brit milah attacking the ritual as, among other things, unhealthy, complete with cartoons showing leering, fang-toothed rabbis wielding blood-drenched knives,
The Mayo Clinic

The Mayo Clinic
Photo Credit: MayoClinic.org

With no more important problems to address in the world, the European Community and even some Americans have attempted to focus public attention on what some claim to believe is the biggest human rights abuse on the planet right now: Jews circumcising their eight day old sons.

Many will recall a venomous campaign against brit milah attacking the ritual as, among other things, unhealthy, complete with cartoons showing leering, fang-toothed rabbis wielding blood-drenched knives, which circulated for a while in San Francisco — the city universally regarded as the world capital of healthy sexual practices.

A new study published by the highly respected Mayo Clinic, however, just may add enough actual facts to the discussion so that a rational result can be attained.

In the Mayo study, Dr. Brian J. Morris explains that “over their lifetime half of uncircumcised males will contract an adverse medical condition caused by their foreskin.” As a result, Morris concludes, the health benefits of infant male circumcision outweigh the risks by a factor of at least 100 to 1.

Dr. Morris and his co-authors argue that the health benefits of milah – not only for the male who undergoes it but also for any future sexual partners — are so great that doctors should be required to offer the procedure to parents. Morris explains: “circumcision might be seen in the same light as other interventions that parents must choose for their child. It is the duty of states to create conditions necessary for the fulfillment of rights to good health by facilitating the availability of interventions that are beneficial. Logically it can be argued that should include male circumcision.”

The study also disproves the suggestion that benefits from circumcision can be obtained if it is delayed until the male is old enough to decide for himself whether to undergo it. Dr. Morris demonstrates not only that there are effectively no detriments to the procedure, but also that its performance in infancy dramatically reduces the risk of urinary tract infections during childhood which may lead to kidney damage. In addition, in a conclusion which will no doubt calm some of those who characterize the Jews’ ancient practice as child abuse, the study also concludes that there is “no adverse effect of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, or pleasure.”

All of Morris’s evidence should make a big difference to those who oppose infant male circumcision by analogizing it to female genital mutilation, claiming for themselves the mantle of “intactivists.” We are not aware of anyone —anyone sane, anyway — who even claims that that barbaric practice has any positive medical effects, for the woman victim or anyone else.

The Mayo study concludes with what can only be described as a tongue-in-cheek recognition of the Jew-hatred that really animates the movement against infant male circumcision, but which often tries to hide its face. Morris sums up as follows:

Many nations that condemn childhood male circumcision are not as quick to condemn other comparably invasive and dangerous procedures that have no medical benefit, eg, cosmetic orthodontia, correction of harelip, surgery for tongue-tie, growth hormone injections for treatment of dwarfism, and removal of supernumerary digits. Thus . . . it seems odd that neonatal male circumcision is regarded by some as controversial.

Odd indeed — my goodness, whatever could be motivating such people?

Dr. Morris’s conclusion brings to mind the exchange in doggeral between William Norman Ever, a now-happily unknown British journalist, and Ogden Nash: “How odd of God to choose the Jews,” Ever opined; but “it wasn’t odd,” Nash answered, for “the Jews chose God.”

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

Please use the Facebook Tab below to leave your comment:

13 Responses to “Mayo on Milah”

  1. Excellent article…..a little logic and truth goes a long way.

  2. JoAnn Morris says:

    Great article, thank you. Nash’s comment is right on!

  3. Yori Mendel says:

    The Bris has absolutely nothing to do with Sanitation Practices. It has everything to do with being in the Covenant with G-D. Those who aren’t Circumcised by an Orthodox Rabbi, and by Two Orthodox Witnesses viewing according to Torah, the Mishnah, and the Talmud, are not a Part of Israel, or it’s Covenant with G-D. Christians are not Part of the Covenant, whether a Doctor Circumcised them at a Hospital at Birth, or Not. The Law on Circumcision is very Specific, and Cannot be Altered.

  4. Eduardo Mazo says:

    yes since then that wound that heal and healthy.

  5. I agree, and will never be changed. It is a Conenant.
    The mizrahi Jews brit is beautiful.

  6. Allen Miller says:

    That’s why God commanded it!

  7. While I don’t think it should be forced on anyone, I don’t understand the anti-circumcision movement. They tried to ban it in San Francisco and are thinking about banning it in some European countries.

  8. Yori, two points. Orthodox it’s not required in Torah, only a Jew. Secondly, the Mayo only commented on the health aspects. What a great bonus to G-d’s word!

  9. Sadie Acosta says:

    Lol “benefits” coming from the money hungry doctors.

  10. There are many benefits with circumcised men :)

  11. There are many benefits with circumcised men :)

  12. Barb Bear says:

    That’s a REALLY good site, Vincent Coletta.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Loading Disqus Comments ...
Current Top Story
UNRWA bags once had wheat -- Hamas now uses them to hide evidence of digging. Where did they get them ... Friends of the IDF photo - FB
Netanyahu Regrets Gaza Casualties, But Operation Continues
Latest Indepth Stories
UNHRC High Commissioner Navi Pillay is calling for an investigation of Israel's military actions in Gaza. (archive photo)

UNHRC High Commissioner Navi Pillay accuses the IDF of possible war crimes in Gaza again, cutting slack to Hamas.

Rabbi Meir Kahane at the National Press Club ~ 1985

Rabbi Kahane spoke of transfer, because it was what the Torah spoke of.

Hamas terrorists in Gaza have been using human shields to protect them from the IDF as they launch rocket attacks against Israel.

There is much I can write you about what is going here, but I am wondering what I should not write. I will start by imagining that I am you, sitting at home in the Los Angeles area and flipping back and forth between the weather, traffic reports, the Ukraine, Mexican illegals and Gaza. No […]

Jews inside Paris synagogue surrounded by protesters throwing rocks, holding bats and chairs.

Should Jews in Europe take more responsibility in self-defense of community and property?

Germany’s The Jewish Faith newspaper ominously noted, “We Jews are in for a war after the war.”

The truth is we seldom explore with kids what prayer is supposed to be about.

Almost as one, Jews around the world are acknowledging the day-to-day peril facing ordinary Jews in Israel and the extraordinary service of the IDF in protecting them.

So on the one hand Secretary Kerry makes no bones about who is at fault for the current hostilities: he clearly blames Hamas.

King Solomon said it long ago: “Cast your bread upon the waters” because you don’t know when you’ll hit something. Our job is to do.

The anti-Israel camp does not need to win America fully to its side. Merely to neutralize it would radically alter the balance of power and put Israel in great jeopardy.

We mourn the dead, wish a speedy recovery to the wounded, and pray that God guides the government.

Charges from the court of world public opinion and their refutations.

It is up to our government to ensure that their sacrifices were not made for short-term gains.

Supporting Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, has become dangerous in Malmo.

More Articles from Louie V. Yadua
An Iron Dome Missile Battery near Tel Aviv on the first day of Operation Protective Edge, July 8, 2014.

We hit their missiles in mid-air with computer-guided projectiles invented and built by Jews’ between rounds of rigorous scientific education or yeshiva study.

The median age of Presbyterians is 63.

In 20 years it won’t matter what the Presbyterians thought or whom they pretended to love.

Mayo Clinic study confirms health benefits of circumcision.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/mayo-on-milah/2014/04/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: