Photo Credit: Yossi Zeliger/Flash90
HaBayit HaYehudi leader Naftali Bennett with a friend, Tel Aviv,. December 27 2012.

An examination through moral lenses of Netanyahu’s and Bennet’s positions on the expulsion of Jews, reveals that they are opposite sides of the same coin. On one side are carved super-moral values, and on the other moral degradation. On one side national-Jewish values, on the other politically leftist merged with economically right-wing policies. On one side a man who objects, in the name of morality, to expelling people from their homes, on the other one supporting the vile deportation of good Jews, salt of the earth, who had turned Gush Katif into a thriving region and were already raising their third generation there.

And, please, don’t give me the line about outside coercion. There was no foreign pressure involved in the expulsion of Gush Katif, only the existential threat against Prime Minister Sharon by renegade ministers vowing to desert his government.



It’s true that the public tends to forget that Netanyahu was a persistent partner in the expulsion of Gush Katif. This week I sat in some conference in Tel Aviv commemorating the Disengagement, and a respectable lady sitting on my side yelled excitedly at the stage: “But Netanyahu objected to the Disengagement!” She, like so many others, had forgotten that Netanyahu’s score on his actions during the Disengagement was a floor hugging 14% (meaning that during 86% of the related discussions in the Knesset he voted either for transfer or at most abstained). Try and explain to her that when the Knesset was debating the proposition of a national referendum on the Disengagement, in October, 2004, after MK Uri Ariel chided him for voting against the referendum, he received from Netanyahu the surprising answer, immortalized by the television cameras: “Make no mistake about it, in the Likud membership referendum I will support the Disengagement.”

So now this man, who was so eager to support that crime, is rebuking a man whose crime is his being moral. An upside down world.

In his efforts to blacken Bennet’s face, Netanyahu has taken an unprecedented, sly step. Minutes before Shabbat, he alerted over to his office the television crews to be interviewed and condemn Bennett. The interviews were broadcast Friday night, and were rehashed ad nauseum throughout the Shabbat. Being Shabbat observers, Bennett and his staff had no way of responding. So the hate Bennett campaign had free reign, unanswered, for 25 hours. Did we mention sly?

But the public was hip to it. The public rejected the campaign to blacken Bennett’s face. An Haaretz poll conducted after the storm (Dec. 25) showed Jewish Home rising to 13 seats. If I were Bennett, I’d have sent Netanyahu a large bouquet of flowers.


What is the actual conclusion from the attack on Bennett and his clearly morally superior statement? It’s not inconceivable that Netanyahu has his own big plan, following in Ariel Sharon’s footsteps, to execute yet another disengagement, this time in Judea and Samaria.

Netanyahu has already made clear that this would be his final term in office, and therefore he intends to permit himself moves that have not been tried in the past. If he’s looking at Disengagement Part 2, he would obviously not rely on Bennett, but would include, instead, Shelly Yachimovich and the conscientious objectors to IDF service on her list, Meirav Michaeli (5th), Yossi Yona (20th) and other leftists; as well as Mrs, Clean, Tzipi Livni, who has in her number 2 spot the most senior conscientious objector in IDF history, retired Brigadier General Amram Mitzna, who, in the middle of the battle on Beirut refused a direct order to enter the Lebanese terror capital; and, of course, rising start Yair Lapid.

In such a case, Jewish Home will stay in the opposition. But it’s still better to have an opposition Jewish Home faction with 15 seats that matters, over the 3 member faction inside the former coalition government—with the Science and Space portfolio—that mattered to no one.

At this stage of the race to the Knesset, as the Jewish Home’s strength is only increasing, and while the threat of a Bibi-Shelly-Tzipi-Yair government is in the air, let us remember that not one democratic government in the world has expelled Jews forcibly in the last 68 years, except for the Sharon, Olmert and Netanyahu governments.



  1. Yori: “The gangster in this fable is, forgive my insolence, Benjamin Netanyahu.”.

    There was a time on the news that GW Bush visited Israel and in a meeting with Shas leaders, Eli Yishy said that he will vote against the government that was ready to pass what GW Bush supported. Here’s the conversation in part: GWB to Eli, “So, you’re willing to vote against the government?” Eli: “Yes”. GWB: “We have to have a little talk before you vote to see if you are willing to do that.” Since that time, Eli dropped out of the spot light of news, was quiet as a mouse on all issues, didn’t vote against the government and has not voted against the government to this day.

    Now, if one would do an analysis/review of all government actions, one will see that no matter who is in the PM position (Left, Right), his actions are the same and right in line of what the American Administration wants.

    What Bibi and Bennett are saying now is ONLY for election results and nothing more. Disengagements, demolitions and housing freezes is what Obama wants and that is what he will get…………..until the Mosiach comes. Bibi is spineless facing Obama's request, Bennett is spineless facing Bibi's request (regarding going against IDF orders of which he retracted); so, if/when Bennett faces Obama, there were will be a complete OBAMAnation and nullification of Bennett's housing values. There seems to be only one who is willing to stand his ground on the values of Judaism and we'll see how many votes he gets.

  2. Liad — you're showing tremendous insight and understanding of politics in general and Israeli politics specifically. The article is not wriotten by me, however, but by Menachem Rahat, who used to be the news desk chief at Maarive for decades. I'll ask him to respond after Shabbat. I don't think he will disagree with you either.

  3. The debate should be whether the IDF should be used against their own people. The premise should be that the army should never be used for such goals, as it is an illegal order to remove a Jew from their home. A soldier has no obligation to participate in a civil war against Jews. IT is a criminal misuse of the IDF. If we argue whether the soldier should obey or not, the debate is lost. As long as the debate is reduced to the argument about a soldier's private conscience, the debate is over.

  4. I don't understand all the love for Bennett.
    First he says he supports soldiers refusing orders. The next day he backs down off of his statement.
    He also is on record supporting giving autonomy to the Arabs in 39% of Judea and Samaria.
    He also went on CNN recently and said that the Arabs "should've turned Gaza into their Singapore".
    And by the way, he was Bibi's Chief of Staff from 2006-2008, and afterwards he ran the Yesha Council, which has been shown over the past 20 years to simply be a tool of the government instead of being a force trying to stop Oslo and Expulsions.
    Why do we like this guy?

  5. Bennett did not back down, as it was reported. We like him because we already know who Bibi is and what he does, and this man is independent, and has given no cause to believe he will betray us. What do you know about him in terms of positions he has taken that signify he will betray the right? The fact that he worked for Bibi is not enough in my book. I want to see something specific. He also provides competition for BIBI- and competition is healthy for any democracy.

  6. PS Milousdad What specific thing did Bennett do in Yesha Council that you are aware of that leads you to believe he will betray Israel. Ia m well aware of Yesha Council's betrayals. Also when did he serve in the Yesha Council, was it after 2005?

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...