web analytics
May 25, 2013 /16 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Q & A: Tractate Avot


tell a friend
QuestionsandAnswers-logo

QUESTION: Why is Avot prefaced with a mishna from another tractate? Also, why do we refer to this tractate as Avot, meaning “fathers”?
Shlomo Feivelson
Coconut Creek, FL
ANSWER: The Gaon R. Meir Grunberg, zt”l, the Keizmarker Rav, who served as deputy Av Beit Din of the Rabbinical Alliance (Igud Horabbonim), discusses the name of Tractate Avot in his Zichron Meir (Vol. 1), published by the Rabbinical Alliance of America. He explains that the ethical standards that characterize the Jewish nation are enumerated in this tractate, and they are derived from the character and behavior of our forefathers, starting with the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. They set the foundations of our nation based on love of G-d and love of our fellowman.R. Grunberg notes that when Abraham beseeched G-d on behalf of Sodom (Genesis 18:27), he demonstrated profound humility, stating, “Vaya’an Avraham va’yomar, hineh ho’alti ledabber el Hashem, ve’anochi afar va’efer - Abraham answered, saying, behold, may I speak to G-d, and I am but dust and ashes.”

R. Grunberg also mentions the incident at Elonei Mamre (Genesis 18:1-2): “Va’yera elav Hashem be’elonei mamre, vehu yoshev petach ha’ohel kechom hayom. Va’yissa einav va’yar ve’hineh shelosha anashim nitzavim alav, va’yar va’yaratz likratam mi’petach ha’ohel va’yishtachu artza - Hashem appeared to him (Abraham) at Elonei Mamre as he was sitting in the doorway of the tent, and he lifted his eyes and saw three men standing before him; he ran toward them and bowed to the ground.” Rashi and Siftei Chachamim note that Hashem’s appearance to Abraham was a visit to the sick.

Here is a person of advanced age (Abraham was 99 years old at that time), three days after his circumcision, yet he does not send messengers to greet potential guests but runs, at the risk of his health, to welcome three nomads into his home. R. Grunberg also notes another verse that emphasizes Abraham’s trait of generous hospitality (Genesis 21:33): “Va’yita eshel bi’[B]e’er Sheva va’yikra sham be’shem Hashem Kel olam - And he [Abraham] planted a tamarisk tree in Be’er Sheva and called there on the name of Hashem, the Everlasting G-d.” The word eshel, spelled alef, shin, lammed, is explained as an acrostic for achila (food), shetiya (drink) and lina (provision for staying the night), again pointing to Abraham’s hospitality even to strangers.

R. Grunberg’s explanation is strengthened by Rashi’s comment in Sotah (10a) that the lammed stands for levaya, escorting the guests on their way after they have been given food and drink, and that the word eshel means inn.

Our patriarch Isaac was ready to be sacrificed in order to abide by the will of G-d. An angel intervened to prevent Abraham from slaughtering his son, yet Isaac is referred to as “a holy offering to G-d” because his willingness to become a sacrifice is considered as if he had indeed been offered as a sacrifice. A good intention, machashava tova, is considered the equivalent of an accomplished fact (Kiddushin 40a).

We read in Parashat Chayyei Sarah (Genesis 24:63), “Va’yetze Yitzhak lasu’ach basadeh lifnot arev … – Isaac went out to meditate in the field at evening time … ” R. Grunberg remarks that the commentators find the structure of this verse to be different from other scriptural verses. We would have expected the verse to read ‘Isaac went out at evening time to meditate in the field’, since the time of the incident is usually mentioned before a description of the incident itself. For an explanation R. Grunberg refers to his father, who remarks, in accord with Tractate Shabbat (89b), that when G-d said to Abraham, and later to Jacob, “Your children have sinned,” each one responded, “Let them be wiped out for the sanctification of Your Name.” However, when G-d addressed the same complaint to Isaac, Isaac responded with the following reasoning: A person’s normal lifespan is 70 years, but he may only be punished for sins he committed during 50 of these years, since until the age of 20 the Heavenly Court does not punish. Out of the 50 years, 25 are considered nighttime. [The Gemara continues with the argument Isaac made that half of the other 25 years is taken up by daily occupations such as praying, eating and the like. That leaves 12-and-a-half years (in which one could be punished for sins committed). If You, G-d, Isaac continued, are willing to bear those, all is well. Otherwise, let me bear half of it and You, G-d, the other half. And if You desire that all be borne by me, was I not (already) offered as a sacrifice before You?] Isaac went out to the field to meditate and pray in order to remove the condition of erev (akin to nighttime) so that G-d would not punish his children for sins committed at night.

Isaac was not praying for his own need or benefit but for the needs of others, for Klal Yisrael. Thus Isaac, too, like his father, demonstrated love for G-d and for his fellow man.

Jacob is referred to as “the chosen of the patriarchs” (see the Maharsha in his Chiddushei Aggadot ad loc., who explains in detail Abraham’s and Jacob’s reactions when rebuked for their children’s sins). He is called (Genesis 25:27) an ish tam yoshev ohalim, a wholesome man who sat in the tents [of Shem and Ever to learn Torah]. During the 14 years he spent there he gave up sleep in order not to miss any time of the study of Torah. He made a vow to G-d (Genesis 28:22), saying, “Vechol asher titen li, asor a’asrenu lach – And of all that You shall give me, I will surely give a tenth to You.” The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 70:7) notes that Jacob tithed not only his earnings and profit but also consecrated a tenth of his children, the tribe of Levi, to the service of G-d. (The Midrash ibid. explains the concept of one tenth although Levi was, in fact, one of 12 sons.)

Rav Grunberg also notes that the Torah says regarding Jacob (Genesis 33:18), “Va’yavo Ya’akov shalem ir Shechem asher be’eretz Canaan bevo’o miPaddan Aram va’yichan et penei ha’ir - Jacob arrived intact at the city of Shechem which is in the land of Canaan, upon coming from Paddan Aram, and he set up camp before the city.” The Gemara (Shabbat 33b) derives from this verse – interpreting va’yichan to indicate chanan, was gracious - the fact that Jacob, out of gratitude to the inhabitants of Shechem, established for them coinage, bathhouses and marketplaces. Here, too, we see a display of the traits of love of G-d and love of man.

All these examples clearly illustrate the character traits of our patriarchs, the avot, who always endeavored to serve G-d and to show kindness to all of mankind.

(To be continued)

tell a friend

About the Author: Rabbi Yaakov Klass, rav of Congregation K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush, Brooklyn, is Torah Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at yklass@jewishpress.com.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
David Arenberg lost many things during his nearly 12 years in prison, but he found a connection to Judaism.
A Jew Grows in Prison
Latest Judaism Stories
Leff-052413

Do you say Shema before you go to sleep? I’m sure you do.

But perhaps you, like many, feel too tired at night to say the entire tefillah of Kri’as Shema as it appears in the siddur. If you do say the entire tefillah, you will recognize a pasuk in this week’s Haftorah. And if you don’t say the whole Kri’as Shema al Hamitah, perhaps after this column, you’ll re-consider and find yourself connecting with the following very comforting pasuk.

Niehaus-052413

The sand is rapidly running through the hourglass, as the centrifuges in the secret Iranian nuclear plants spin furiously. It is quite clear that the Iranians are on the brink of attaining nuclear capability, and we are well aware of the danger that would face Klal Yisroel in that event, chas v’sholom. All the sanctions, threats, and computer worm attacks do not seem to be stopping them, and it is terrifying. And when we see how vulnerable we are to terrorist attacks anywhere in the world, we become even more terrified.

The-Shmuz

Miriam spoke disparagingly about Moshe Rabbeinu. Because of this, she contracted tzaras, and for seven days she was sent outside the camp of Israel.

Business-Halacha-logo

Samuel Scherr was a very successful businessman. He also was generous and would share of his wealth with others. In this way, he became the uncle of favor to his nieces and nephews, whom he would frequently shower with gifts.

Detached Or Unrelated
‘He Made An Asheirah Tree Into a Ladder…’
(Eruvin 78b)

In this week’s parshah we read about the individuals who were tamei and thus could not bring the korban Pesach. They approached Moshe Rabbeinu and asked him whether there was anything they could do to bring the korban. Ultimately, Hashem told Moshe that they should bring a korban a month after Pesach, on the 14th of Iyar.

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

One of the thirty-nine prohibited melachot on Shabbat is carrying an object from a private domain, reshut hayachid, to a public domain, reshut harabim, or carrying an object a distance of four amot, six to eight feet, in a reshut harabim. The Torah does permit, however, carrying within the reshut hayachid itself. The definition of a reshut hayachid and a reshut harabim is crucial, therefore, to the laws of carrying on Shabbat.

Question: The Midrash notes that the song the Jews sang after they crossed the Red Sea (“Az Yashir”) was unique; its likes had never been heard before in the world. Our Sages even refer to it as a shirah chadashah, a “new song.” What made “Az Yashir” so unique and in what sense was it a “new song”?

The rav was not a wealthy man, but earned enough to live comfortably. He earned his money by serving as the rav of a religious community in Yerushalayim. He also received some royalties from sefarim he had written over the years. He was well known, and many people approached him for a berachah, advice and help. They were not turned away.

Tanach, the Hebrew Bible, is remarkable for the extreme realism with which it portrays human character. Its heroes are not superhuman. Its non-heroes are not archetypal villains. The best have failings; the worst often have saving virtues. I know of no other religious literature quite like it.

Last week I shared a letter from a newly observant Jewish woman. She and her husband reside in a small suburban community outside of Los Angeles. Last year they came to consult with me on a personal religious issue. While they were both ba’alei teshuvah, there was one fine difference between them. He had become a ba’al teshuvah earlier than she and was therefore somewhat more settled in an observant lifestyle.

I watch my children use blocks to build a large structure, observing the trepidation with which they add each block. As the structure becomes larger there is a greater risk of it collapsing, thus bringing an end to an hour of playful labor. I anticipate what will happen when one child adds a block to the top floor, compromising the integrity of the building and resulting in the collapse of the entire structure. The argument that ensues is predictable, as each child blames the other for “ruining” the fun. As an adult, I wonder about the need to attribute blame. Will assigning blame be instrumental in rebuilding the structure?

In this week’s parshah the Torah discusses the halachos of when one steals from another and when confronted in beis din, the thief swears falsely with his denial that he stole. This parshah was already taught in parshas Vayikra; however, there are two halachos that the Torah adds in this parshah to this topic.

In order to carry from one’s home into the street (even when the area is enclosed by a properly constructed eruv), the eruvin ceremony must be performed. This ceremony involves the placing of food in one designated home on behalf of all Sabbath observers in the enclosed area. In order for the eruvin ceremony to be valid, however, it must be performed on behalf of all owners of streets and homes in the enclosed area.

More Articles from Rabbi Yaakov Klass
QuestionsandAnswers-logo

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As the shamash in a small community shul with an aging population, I am faced with numerous challenges. The following is only one of them. During sefirah, different people daven for the amud for Ma’ariv. Once, a bar mitzvah was one of them. On another occasion, a very recent ger lead the service. Were these individuals allowed to lead the congregation in counting sefirah? I also wonder, in general, if everyone should be trusted to lead the counting. What if someone forgot to count on one of the previous nights but does not inform anyone of this?

No Name
(Via E-Mail)

Question: As the shamash in a small community shul with an aging population, I am faced with numerous challenges. The following is only one of them. During sefirah, different people daven for the amud for Ma’ariv. Once, a bar mitzvah was one of them. On another occasion, a very recent ger lead the service. Were these individuals allowed to lead the congregation in counting sefirah? I also wonder, in general, if everyone should be trusted to lead the counting. What if someone forgot to count on one of the previous nights but does not inform anyone of this?

No Name
(Via E-Mail)

    Latest Poll

    If you could only choose one of the following scenarios regarding Chareidi IDF service, which would you choose?





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/ask-the-rabbi/q-a-tractate-avot/2003/10/08/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close