Photo Credit: Courtesy ZAKA
ZAKA at the scene near Lions Gate.

Israel’s Medical Association, the only entity in Israel in charge of setting the standards of medical ethics for all doctors and medical teams, last week decided to change the rules regarding the treatment of injuries in terror attack scenes: from now on, medical teams must provide medical care to victims at the scene of a terrorist attack, including the terrorist perpetrators, according to the severity of their injury.

While MDA, Israel’s EMT service, announced that they would treat the terrorist first, if he or she present the worst injuries, ZAKA, the voluntary community emergency response organization, decided to instruct their volunteers to first provide medical assistance to the victims, Jews or Arabs. Haim Foxman, a longtime ZAKA volunteer, arrived on Wednesday at the scene at Lions Gate, where three Jews had been injured, and decided to deal first with the wounded Jews and not the terrorists, despite the fact that the latter were more badly hurt, Kikar Hashabbat reported.


Foxman posted his experience on the social networks: “To anyone who wants to know, when I got to the scene today at the Lions Gate in Jerusalem, I treated the stabbing victims and, no! I did not go to take care of the terrorist may his name be damned! (sic) — even though his condition was precarious.”

Foxman received praise from surfers. Some surfers warned him not to advertise his actions, fearing an investigation would be launched against him. But the official ZAKA Twitter account backed Foxman, saying, “Usually at the initial phase on the scene the terrorist has been identified, and our policy is indeed to prefer the victims in giving medical care.”

Foxman told Kikar Hashabbat, “when I see that police have identified the terrorist, then I go first to the victims and give them care. I really don’t care what’s the condition of the terrorist.” He added, “To all those who may react cynically, I would like to hear from them what they would do if they were to reach the scene of the attack and had seen, God forbid, their relative lying on the ground wounded as the terrorist next to them is dying in critical condition. What would they do, help their relative first or the terrorist?”

However, Foxman emphasized, “if it’s the scene of an accident and a rescue team member sees his wounded relative with medium injuries, and another who is seriously injured — he should treat them according to the severity of the injury, although in the field not everyone would have acted this way — if he were to see his brother wounded, for example.”

To those who might say that ZAKA volunteers are not supposed to treat the wounded, only the dead, Foxman said: “Indeed, ZAKA volunteers take care of dead people, but a very large number of ZAKA volunteers also give first aid.”

Foxman said that “if in a terrorist attack Arabs were more seriously injured and Jews less so, I would treat according to the severity of the injury, but I would not take care of the murderer first.”

ZAKA Chairman Yehuda Meshi-Zahav commented that “we certainly support [Foxman]. He follows the directive of our organization — care for the victims before treating the murderer. We support him and other volunteers who have done and will do the same.”



  1. difference between the two organizations is that one is a private organization made up strictly by volunteers and the other is a National organization which must conform to IMA laws. We may not like it or agree with it but unless the law changes one cannot simply break the law because we disagrees with it… Sucks but its the law

  2. i have no idea what Germany has to do with this but again – breaking the law for a NATIONAL humanitarian organization member of the International Red Cross – could mean not only the loss of their license , but heavy fines as well which will put paramedics first-respondents and emergency personnel at risk. Taking a moral stand is fine and dandy but if you break the law – you will pay the price…, up to you. You are not authorize to speak on their behalf or as a representative of the law

  3. I understand plenty Travis but this is not the 1940’s and Israel’s national emergency organization today is a member of the International Red Cross which Zaka is not. Big difference. Whereas I most certainly agree that no terrorist should remain alive let alone be treated by any Jewish doctor in any Jewish hospital, the fact still remains that Israel is not a vigilante state and International organizations cannot simply ignore international laws.

  4. A terrorist Travis is anyone who;’s own leaders and very often family and society brainwash to such an extend that he would stoop so low as to go out and simply stabs or rams his/her car into innocent passers by, men women and children, for no other reason than their religion or nationality. How would you define someone doing this to you or anyone in your family simply because the color of your skin?

  5. the terrorist attackers can wait and if needed gladly die on teh grounds we are not obligated to medicate the bastards let alone have a party get well soon for them, they come to attack and kill, our job is to nullify them,and care of the innocent wounded. NOT the other way around, anyone with the other way around mentality is either retarded, a psychopath, or trying to get the required information needed for to see if there are cells around, that i understand, but not to medi aid them for a walk out and chance to attack again, that mentalities are totally idiotic, we fight against them not defend them, they committed the illegal acts on continuing after its thinking.. .. we defend the innocents. no question, no arguments no pitty to the their side with death unquestionable attitudes against us,. simple.

  6. Well, we all have freewill. And our choices are ours to defend, not anyone else's.

    And this is a World War; if the attacker lives, will he attack again? How many will he kill, the next time? So, by allowing him or her to die, what is gained, or lost?

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...