web analytics
August 25, 2016 / 21 Av, 5776
News & Views
Sponsored Post

Steinberg’s Gay-Straight Agenda Taking JOFA to Unexpected Places

There is no such thing as a homosexual person, man or woman, in halacha. There are only homosexual acts.

My liberal Orthodox shul on the Lower East Side is a warm place for gays – but not for the gay agenda.

My liberal Orthodox shul on the Lower East Side is a warm place for gays – but not for the gay agenda.

On Saturday, December 7 & Sunday, December 8, JOFA, Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, is having its 8th International Conference of Feminism and Orthodoxy (Voices of Change) in New York City. Being married to a feminist wife and having raised a feminist daughter, this writer has no problem with women seeking to merge their political and religious beliefs within Orthodox Judaism. I’m only leery of some voices within JOFA whose agenda has less to do with women’s joy of Judaism, as they do with forcing unacceptable values on liberal Orthodoxy which is, I believe, still a halachically-based movement.

This writer spent about five years davening at a very liberal synagogue on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, and so my familiarity with Orthodox feminism is direct and personal. I’d like to share with you now the main reason for the fact that the majority of women in our shul did not participate in our study programs, and did not push for weekly women’s Torah reading: they didn’t care for it.

The shul is led by one of the most open minded and accepting rabbis I’ve met, a YU graduate who devotes his life to the shul and works day and night, quite literally, to increasing membership and member participation. The shul president is a woman and the shul leadership is comprised largely by women, and on Shabbat mornings, sometime between the end of Shachrit and beginning of the kiddush, many women show up. But there’s little interest on the part of the women in doing what has been a traditional men’s things in traditional Judaism.

For the record: twice a year or so, the women do conduct their own prayer service and read from the Torah, quite with the rabbi’s and the men’s positive support. And they read megillah together on Purim (only at night, though). Oh, and some years the women take out their own sefer Torah to the street on Simchat Torah night, to dance with (but not the next day, when they’re resting).

The study sessions offered by the rabbi and others are very popular, by which I mean they attract anywhere from five to ten participants. Same goes for the Shabbat third meal study and nosh sessions. And there’s always at least one woman there, and one transgender woman, the latter a fabulous Torah learner.

It’s rare for more than these two to show up. The rest of the women of the shul just aren’t so interested. It takes a lot of emailing and Facebook poking to get a more significant women’s presence. And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it.

It’s quite OK for women who are doctors and lawyers and writers in their professional lives, not to desire to be Torah students. They keep kashrut and Shabbat, they raise lovely, smart children, and when they finally make it to shul Shabbat morning, they prefer to lean back in their seats and let the men read from the Torah—rather than schlep a Torah downstairs, not to speak of preparing a week in advance for the proper reading.

In my opinion, there is no feminist issue in my old synagogue, no repression of women, no limits on what women may do in the shul—within the boundaries of halacha, which I assume they, by definition, have accepted before setting foot in the place.

The only function of feminism in today’s liberal faction of Orthodoxy—which is, more or less my place in the tradition—is to provide a fuel and a livelihood to organizations like JOFA: Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance.

There’s nothing wrong with Jews getting together and talking and setting agendas and issuing urgent messages. There’s certainly nothing wrong with it halachically. But an organization which devotes so much time, effort and treasure to promoting feminism in the most female-supportive sector of American Orthodox Judaism is tantamount to an organization that would launch a campaign to convince people to breathe. We’re there already.

In all of the liberal Orthodox shuls in America there is nothing but respect and encouragement to women’s participation. Gone are the days when an older generation would frown on letting women give a Dvar Torah or be shul president. Within halachic guidelines—which we all know can be stretched and then stretched some more—women are thriving in these congregations.

YCT, Rabbi Avi Weiss’ inspired creation, can’t produce graduates fast enough—they’re grabbed by shuls across America as soon as they receive their smicha. There are no enemies of feminism in any of our shuls, unless you consider my saying that most women don’t care so much for Torah study to position me as an enemy of feminism—and that means you seriously need a thicker skin.

JOFA has no battle to fight in promoting women’s rights in my neck of the Orthodox woods. Even on the issue of ordination for women, it’s YCT that lost its nerve, not the synagogues. I’ll bet you, if the Avi Weiss school acquires the brass equipment to ordain a woman rabbi—the shuls out there would bid high to hire her. (You’re welcome to debate me on this, but please do it honestly).

There is an area where JOFA is stretching the envelope thin: forcing liberal Orthodox synagogues to accept and integrate openly gay members, including openly gay families.

For the record: I wholly support accepting gay men and women in our congregations, single, married, whatever, based on my personal preference and personality. Also for the record: I vehemently object to conducting “Orthodox gay weddings” and to ordaining openly gay Orthodox rabbis, based on halacha.

Aaron Steinberg, JOFA’s Associate Director, said three years ago:

“What our community needs is a … forum for straights and gays to come together under a common cause of inclusion and equality in the Orthodox community…

“We need a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Orthodox Jewish community as a whole. There’s probably a better name for something like this, but we need a way to spread the message that many people in the Orthodox community want their synagogues to be safe, warm and welcoming places to same-sex families, and homosexual singles. This is the next step towards many more advances down the road.”

How do you read the line about our “common cause of inclusion and equality in the Orthodox community”? Openly gay Orthodox rabbis? Gay weddings in Orthodox synagogues?

It can’t possibly be about rejecting gays from shul, because we don’t. I have no doubt that all the liberal Orthodox shuls in America have homosexual members, and they probably feel comfortable there, judging by my own shul on the Lower East Side. That couldn’t be Steinberg’s “equality” agenda. Gays get aliyahs to the Torah, gays lead prayer services—because we’re open minded and inclusive, and that gives it the power of law!

Here’s where Steinberg misunderstands Jewish law: there is no such thing as a homosexual person, man or woman, in halacha. There are only homosexual acts, which are punishable based on a very detailed set of rules, except nowadays we simply don’t have the rabbinical court with the authority to even entertain such a case, much less rule on it.

And as long as any shul member does not practice his or her predilections in the pews—and that goes for all the straight adulterous, covetous and embezzleous members as well—they are just Jews, deserving of all the honors and obligations of a Jewish person. See? The Torah is far more liberal than JOFA, which suggests there’s a special class of gay Jews. It makes no difference if you point me out as someone to love or to hate—it’s the pointing out that is unacceptable.

Steinberg’s “Gay-Straight Alliance for the Orthodox Jewish community as a whole” is using the terminology of the civil rights movement to alter the liberal Orthodox congregation, so it gives its blessings to same sex marriages and to openly gay rabbis. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but Aaron Steinberg has a dream.

“It’s been too long that homosexuality remains a taboo only within the Orthodox community,” he wrote on his blog, continuing a little later on: “The gay Jew is not living an immoral life. We as a community need to openly discuss how to find an understanding of the Torah’s attitude on homosexual intercourse, but the welcoming of openly gay individuals should not be delayed until that is achieved.”

That statement is outright bizarre, coming from a man living a halachic life. First, halachically there’s no such thing as a gay Jew, only homosexual acts. Second, our lives are morally fluid, not “moral” or “immoral.” We move from mistakes to atonement and repair, to trying again — it’s the very foundation of our teachings. And, finally, who is not welcoming openly gay individuals? It’s not the welcoming he’s shooting for, it’s the incorporation of values.

Here’s another Steinberg gay values statement, disguised as Kumbaya gobbledygook: “We need to make our synagogues and schools safe places for gay Jews to associate themselves, and exercise the beautiful values of community, unity and togetherness that we have otherwise valued so greatly.”

In what liberal Orthodox synagogue are gays unsafe? In what progressive Orthodox school are gay Jews being bullied? Ah, but it’s the gay “beautiful values” Steinberg is promoting here: sex is holy, whether it’s between a man and a woman or between two guys. Well, it isn’t. It may be necessary, every human being needs intimacy, and there may be ways for Orthodox gay men to hold on to some form of intimacy and remain within the boundaries of halacha – but by forcing the “beautiful values” thing, he’s not having a discussion, he’s advocating passionately for a distinctly anti-halachic view. In other words, he’s being dishonest.

The notion that JOFA as a whole can have serious influence outside the liberal Orthodox circles is plain silly. If anything, more and more of Orthodoxy is moving in the opposite direction—to my chagrin, too. So no one is paying attention to JOFA other than liberal Orthodox Jews, and we’ve already handed women our leadership positions and embraced gays in our midst.

What Aaron Steinberg is trying to do—on behalf of JOFA—is alter liberal Orthodoxy by embracing the gay agenda; again, not the gays, but the agenda. I’m against it.

Yori Yanover

About the Author: Yori Yanover has been a working journalist since age 17, before he enlisted and worked for Ba'Machane Nachal. Since then he has worked for Israel Shelanu, the US supplement of Yedioth, JCN18.com, USAJewish.com, Lubavitch News Service, Arutz 7 (as DJ on the high seas), and the Grand Street News. He has published Dancing and Crying, a colorful and intimate portrait of the last two years in the life of the late Lubavitch Rebbe, (in Hebrew), and two fun books in English: The Cabalist's Daughter: A Novel of Practical Messianic Redemption, and How Would God REALLY Vote.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

13 Responses to “Steinberg’s Gay-Straight Agenda Taking JOFA to Unexpected Places”

  1. Lazar Rozenblat says:

    You said you believe that liberal Orthodoxy iis still a halachically-based movement, yet you are talking about women dancing on the street (obviously without a mehitza), reading from the Torah and having their prayer service (I wonder if they say Borhu and Kadish?). Apparently liberal Orthodoxy has a different understanding of Halacha.

  2. That’s a fascinating take. We offered them Torah and more involvement in the shul and they are just not interested. Thus, our job is done. That’s pretty sad. You can’t be so psychologically unsophisticated that you don’t realize that people are products of their environment, years of educational bias and direct and subtle secondary messages. Here’ another way to look at it: Most of the women I know (feminist and non-feminists alike) believe in equal pay and their right to sit anywhere on the bus. Most of them are not particularly interested in equality when it comes to taking out the garbage. Just exactly what are you comparing Torah to??
    It is our job to make our daughters love Torah and involvement in Torah, to teach them it’s their responsibility to davin and make sure the Torah reading is excellent, to make them feel proud of those accomplishments. If our daughters don’t feel this way, we (as a community) are doing something wrong. It may be too late for the women. It’s not too late for our girls!

    And regarding gays, are you really serious? You think that in most communities the people (not the acts) are treated with dignity and respect? You are just plain wrong. I am in the field of sexuality and the horror stories I hear regularly are heartbreaking. Recently, in public, in a quite prestigious environment, a (non chareid) young man said “I don’t understand. If gays are ‘chayav mita’ anyhow why are we worried about suicide? “ Forget the acts for a minute, I’m talking about the people. We as a community need to band together and figure out a way to respond to their needs and make Orthodox Judaism a welcoming and accepting place for them. After all, we do the same for all the women who come to shul on Shabbat wearing make-up.

  3. Mordechai Luchins says:

    I'm sorry, but as long as certain large "progressive" Jewish groups can forbid member synagogues from having female presidents, there is a clear need for JOFA.

  4. Rebecca Saidlower says:

    The author paints a pretty picture of the Modern Orthodox community but it sure does not represent the one I live in. Many (if not most) MO shuls that I know of do NOT allow women to be presidents, to dance with the torah on Simchat Torah, to hold a women's megillah reading on Purim, and are not all that warm and welcoming to gay men or women (or, I'm sorry, men and women who perform homosexual acts). This article feels completely off base to me.

  5. But Jews apparently must understand the issue as redefined outside halakha. We must check first. (sarcasm)

  6. Leo Erwin says:


  7. Dan Silagi says:

    Ifyou, Lazar, have a problem with women reading from the Torah, that's your problem.

  8. Ben Yosef Shomer says:

    open minded……..you invited all the winds and the wild animalls in . so say corrupt not open…..

  9. Haley Yael Firkser says:

    Heterosexual privilege at its finest…

  10. Jennifer Seligman says:

    I'm glad your shul is so open to increased women's participation, but it is far from the norm for even "modern" orthodox shuls–there are such a small number where women having megillah readings, torah readings, and even just having a torah on simchat torah compared to the numbers that don't–JOFA still has work to do, at least in my own community

  11. Les says:

    Glad to see reb Yanover sees the light on this issue.

    For the rest of you obama-voting whiners so dissatisfied with MO why don’t you go join the jews u really feel comfortable with: reform and conservative. I heard they are losing people very year and I am sure they would welcome you to their gay mixed marriage Nakba day events, and you can be sure the food will be halal.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Photo credit: Ammon News
Report: Muslim Brotherhood Running ISIS Children’s Training Camp in Jordan

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/steinbergs-gay-straight-agenda-taking-jofa-to-unexpected-places/2013/11/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: