Photo Credit: YouTube
Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, at Rambam Medical Center, Oct. 2, 2014.

Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the British medical journal The Lancet, unreservedly apologized for running a virulently anti-Israel open letter accusing Israel of a “massacre” in Gaza during this summer’s Operation Protective Edge. The apology was made at the conclusion of a three-day visit to Rambam Medical Center and to the Technion Medical School, in Haifa.

The bitterly anti-Israel letter, written by Paola Manduca and signed by 23 other medical professionals, was published online on July 23.

Advertisement



The open letter accused Israel of committing war crimes, of “targeting whole families, killing them in their homes.”  It claimed that Israel’s attacks on Gaza “aim to terrorise, wound the soul and the body of the people, and make their life impossible in the future, as well as also demolishing their homes and prohibiting the means to rebuild.”

The letter, published in such a prestigious medical journal, also painted virtually all Israeli academics as being complicit in the “massacre and destruction of Gaza” because of their failure to denounce the Israeli government and join with the letter writers in demanding that Israel cease the military action in Gaza.

Although Horton initially refused to apologize for publishing the highly politicized and intemperate letter, according to a press release issued by Rambam Hospital on Thursday, Oct. 2, he completely reversed himself, by the end of his trip.

Horton stated that his visit to Israel was a “turning point for me and my relationship with this region.”

The visit consisted of tours of Rambam’s medical units, a series of medical and ethical lectures, discussions, debates and visits. During his short visit to the region, Dr. Horton met with young Israeli and Arab doctors, in order to gain their perspective, and he met with doctors who treated the wounded on the battlefield in Gaza, both Israeli soldiers and Arab victims.

Discussions during his visit included “Science and Medicine as a Catalyst for Peaceful Coexistence,” and “The Ethics of Armed Conflict and Responsible Scholarly Journalism.”

On Thursday, the last day of his visit, Horton was a guest at a debate entitled, “Publications which promote political agendas have no place in scientific and medical journalism and academics should refrain from publishing in such journals.” Supporting the premise was a professor of Geriatrics at Ben-Gurion University, and opposing was a professor of psychiatry from Tel Aviv University.

Horton ended his visit by giving a lecture in the Rambam Grand Rounds, “Geopolitical Issues and Responsibilities of Medical and Scientific Journals.” (A video of the full lecture follows this article.)

The British doctor began his lecture by stating, “I need, very honestly, to set the record straight with you. First, I deeply regret the completely unnecessary polarization that publication of the letter by Paolo Manduca caused.” He continued, second, “I was personally horrified at the offensive video that was forwarded by two of the authors of that letter. The world view expressed in that video is abhorrent and must be condemned, and I condemn it.” Horton continued with the commitment that he will be “publishing what I have just said in The Lancet next week.”

In addition to making it absolutely clear that he was profoundly sorry that his publication was used in such a blatantly political and completely unjustified manner, Horton expressed the desire for The Lancet to receive papers from Israel and to promote collaboration between Rambam and The Lancet “to further the cause of health care at all levels of society for all peoples.”

Horton told his Israeli colleagues that his visit represents “a fresh start for a new and different future.”

Advertisement

SHARE
Previous articleRav Bina’s Yom Kippur Message – 5775
Next articleMoving on to Sukkos
Lori Lowenthal Marcus is a contributor to the JewishPress.com. A graduate of Harvard Law School, she previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com

43 COMMENTS

  1. Of course he had to apologise, what does he think he is working with? Monkeys, Israel lays great store in all she does, she has a MORAL ARMY, what she does in Gaza is to protect Israel, the army warned about attacks, the attacked homes wher Hamas planted missile launchers, used Palestinian People as Human Shields, and the World condemns Israel only”,,,,,,,oh please, we don’t believe you or the liberal left, just total Anti-semitism, you should all be ashamed, but In spite if you all, Israel will walk tall and talk proudly, enough apologizing for doing the right thing.

  2. I personally will never again read the “Lancet”. Any medical journal that would publish such biased inaccurate information,is prone to publish other misleading information based on insufficient examination of issues. It poses a danger for the public by feeding inaccurate information to physicians. Stuart Oppenheimer MD

  3. [Surak] This seems like a half-throated apology. He’s sorry for the “polarization” this caused. In other words, sorry we were mad. In other words, sorry we took it seriously. In other words, not really sorry. If he is really sorry, he’ll retract those ugly statements and condemn them and his fellow anti-Semites publicly.

  4. I personally will never again read the "Lancet". Any medical journal that would publish such biased inaccurate information,is prone to publish other misleading information based on insufficient examination of issues. It poses a danger for the public by feeding inaccurate information to physicians. Stuart Oppenheimer MD

  5. [Surak] This seems like a half-throated apology. He's sorry for the "polarization" this caused. In other words, sorry we were mad. In other words, sorry we took it seriously. In other words, not really sorry. If he is really sorry, he'll retract those ugly statements and condemn them and his fellow anti-Semites publicly.

  6. I would wait until the letter is prominently published in the Lancet before any gloating about ‘finally’ righting a long overdue wrong. The Lancet has been extremely anti-Israel for a long time now. Some of what its editors have permitted to be published have been blatantly antisemitic – for instance when it pointed out the Jewish sounding names of its critics in order to deflect attention from content that had been published (its chief editor was, at the time, someone with a “Muslim sounding name”!

  7. I would wait until the letter is prominently published in the Lancet before any gloating about 'finally' righting a long overdue wrong. The Lancet has been extremely anti-Israel for a long time now. Some of what its editors have permitted to be published have been blatantly antisemitic – for instance when it pointed out the Jewish sounding names of its critics in order to deflect attention from content that had been published (its chief editor was, at the time, someone with a "Muslim sounding name"!

  8. You call that an apology? I always thought apologizing means to say “I’m sorry”. Did he say he was sorry? I think he was “regretful” that his journal caused bad feelings, but he did not apologize or state his disagreement with the content of that letter. Nobody really considers the Lancet as a quality medical journal anyway.

  9. You call that an apology? I always thought apologizing means to say "I'm sorry". Did he say he was sorry? I think he was "regretful" that his journal caused bad feelings, but he did not apologize or state his disagreement with the content of that letter. Nobody really considers the Lancet as a quality medical journal anyway.

  10. You Stupid scum beg you don all the damage, now you wising your self out . Find a tree and hung your self stupid Muslim Criminal sympathizer. ISIS should sleet your troth after you hung. Bastard.

  11. You Stupid scum beg you don all the damage, now you wising your self out . Find a tree and hung your self stupid Muslim Criminal sympathizer. ISIS should sleet your troth after you hung. Bastard.

  12. Horton is a Bastard, Criminal Muslim Sympathizer. my comment….You Stupid scumbeg you don all the damage, now you wising your self out . Find a tree and hung your self stupid Muslim Criminal sympathizer. ISIS should sleet your troth after you hung. Bastard.

  13. You Stupid scum beg you don all the damage, now you wising your self out . Find a tree and hung your self stupid Muslim Criminal sympathizer. ISIS should sleet your troth after you hung. Bastard.

  14. Horton is a Bastard, Criminal Muslim Sympathizer. my comment….You Stupid scumbeg you don all the damage, now you wising your self out . Find a tree and hung your self stupid Muslim Criminal sympathizer. ISIS should sleet your troth after you hung. Bastard.

  15. I am not sure why a medical journal such as The Lancet is in the business of political commentary, but it seems to me that good science is based upon empiricism and NOT upon hearsay and inflammatory rhetoric. It is my understanding that the Israeli medical community has, for a long time, been making high quality medical care available to citizens of the West Bank and Gaza and this includes well-publicised examples of medical care extended recently to high profile palestinians. Not only is the premise of the toxic Lancet article wrong, but the idea that allegedly educated members of the medical community and, by extension, citizens of other nations may be buying into such propaganda is very hurtful. An unambiguous apology? I’ll say its due.

  16. I am not sure why a medical journal such as The Lancet is in the business of political commentary, but it seems to me that good science is based upon empiricism and NOT upon hearsay and inflammatory rhetoric. It is my understanding that the Israeli medical community has, for a long time, been making high quality medical care available to citizens of the West Bank and Gaza and this includes well-publicised examples of medical care extended recently to high profile palestinians. Not only is the premise of the toxic Lancet article wrong, but the idea that allegedly educated members of the medical community and, by extension, citizens of other nations may be buying into such propaganda is very hurtful. An unambiguous apology? I'll say its due.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...