Photo Credit: Italy in US
Justice Samuel Alito, October 17, 2013.

The Supreme Court, which has been boosted under President Donald Trump with three right-leaning justices: Neil Gorsuch (2017), Brett Kavanaugh (2018), and Amy Coney Barrett (2020), has struck down the January 22, 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to a Justice Samuel Alito (nominated by President George W. Bush in 2006) initial draft majority opinion that was obtained by Politico on Monday (Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows).

The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that the US constitution protects a pregnant woman’s right to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. The Roe v. Wade decision struck down numerous federal and state abortion laws and started a nationwide debate that lasted decades over whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide, and should moral and religious views count in this debate. It also opened a debate over the extent to which the Supreme Court should use its blunt force in shaping constitutional issues.


In 1973, the court ruled 7–2 in favor of Norma McCorvey—a.k.a. “Jane Roe”—who in 1969 became pregnant with her third child and wanted an abortion but in her state of Texas abortion was illegal except to save the mother’s life. The court said that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion.

But the court also stressed that this is not an absolute right and must be balanced against governments’ interests in protecting the health of the woman and her fetus. At the same time, the 1973 Court classified the right to choose an abortion as “fundamental,” which required courts to evaluate the states’ abortion laws under the “strict scrutiny” standard, the highest level of judicial review.

President Trump’s and the Republican majority’s success in radically changing the balance of the Supreme Court to 6 Conservative justices vs. 3 Liberal made the overturning of the 50-year-old Roe v. Wade ruling a matter of when rather than if.

Politico cited the following 10 points from Justice Alito’s draft majority opinion:

  • We hold that Roe and Casey (Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 1992 – DI) must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision….”
  • “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division. It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
  • “In the years prior to [Roe v. Wade], about a third of the States had liberalized their laws, but Roe abruptly ended that political process. It imposed the same highly restrictive regime on the entire Nation, and it effectively struck down the abortion laws of every single State. … [I]t represented the ‘exercise of raw judicial power’… and it sparked a national controversy that has embittered our political culture for a half-century.”
  • “The inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions. On the contrary, an unbroken tradition of prohibiting abortion on pain of criminal punishment persisted from the earliest days of the common law until 1973.”
  • “In some States, voters may believe that the abortion right should be more even more [sic] extensive than the right Casey and Roe recognized. Voters in other States may wish to impose tight restrictions based on their belief that abortion destroys an ‘unborn human being.’ … Our nation’s historical understanding of ordered liberty does not prevent the people’s elected representatives from deciding how abortion should be regulated.”
  • “We have long recognized, however, that stare decisis is ‘not an inexorable command,’ and it ‘is at its weakest when we interpret the Constitution.’ It has been said that it is sometimes more important that an issue ‘be settled than that it be settled right.’ But when it comes to the interpretation of the Constitution — the ‘great charter of our liberties,’ which was meant ‘to endure through a long lapse of ages,’ we place a high value on having the matter ‘settled right.’”
  • “On many other occasions, this Court has overruled important constitutional decisions. … Without these decisions, American constitutional law as we know it would be unrecognizable, and this would be a different country.”
  • “Casey described itself as calling both sides of the national controversy to resolve their debate, but in doing so, Casey necessarily declared a winning side. … The Court short-circuited the democratic process by closing it to the large number of Americans who dissented in any respect from Roe. … Together, Roe and Casey represent an error that cannot be allowed to stand.”
  • “Roe certainly did not succeed in ending division on the issue of abortion. On the contrary, Roe ‘inflamed’ a national issue that has remained bitterly divisive for the past half-century….This Court’s inability to end debate on the issue should not have been surprising. This Court cannot bring about the permanent resolution of a rancorous national controversy simply by dictating a settlement and telling the people to move on. Whatever influence the Court may have on public attitudes must stem from the strength of our opinions, not an attempt to exercise ‘raw judicial power.’”
  • “We do not pretend to know how our political system or society will respond to today’s decision overruling Roe and Casey. And even if we could foresee what will happen, we would have no authority to let that knowledge influence our decision. We can only do our job, which is to interpret the law, apply longstanding principles of stare decisis, and decide this case accordingly. We therefore hold that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.”

Previous articleI See the World From Both Sides Now
Next articleRav Soloveitchik on Sovereignty in Eretz Yisrael
David writes news at