web analytics
November 29, 2014 / 7 Kislev, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Herzliya Campus A Day on Campus

To mark IDC Herzliya’s 20th anniversary, we spent a day following Prof. Uriel Reichman, IDC’s founder and president, and Jonathan Davis, VP for External Relations, around its delightful campus.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

The Case for Teaching Digital Citizenship


disinhibition

It’s no secret that the advancements, affordability and proliferation of technology have been a game changer in terms of our ability to stay connected with friends and family. Thanks to cellphones, texting applications, e-mail, social networking websites, video conferencing, and more, the degree of connectivity we have with each other is unparalleled.

It wasn’t too long ago that long distance phone calls were designated for family members and only the closest of friends, and generally occurred on a pre-arranged day and time. And then along came call waiting, allowing users to speak with one party without the risk of missing another, potentially more important, call.

The advent of home computers brought in a new way of communicating, through chat rooms, e-mail and private messaging. However, the online experience also brought with it a sense of disinhibition, as people began doing and saying things they would not normally do or say in “real life.”

Enter cellphones, texting, and apps. While such access serves as a wonderful convenience, it also has a price. A May 2013 article in The Wall Street Journal noted the recent decline in the frequency and length of eye contact in face-to-face interactions. Adults make eye contact for 30-60 percent of the time in an average conversation, well short of the 60-70 percent required to create a sense of emotional connection. We have increased the quantity of our relationships and accessibility to friends through a digital medium but it has taken a toll on the quality of our relationships.

Some psychologists explain the digital distraction phenomenon as FOMO, the fear of missing out – missing out on an important e-mail, an important update, or an important event.

We have become increasingly reactive. We status update, tweet, blog and e-mail our frustrations, disappointments and real or imagined slights with alarming speed and indifference – and lack of deliberation as to the potential consequences of our actions.

In years gone by, we were advised to handle anger and frustration by writing a letter, putting it in an envelope, and placing it in a drawer for a week – because it was often the case that by the time it was ready to be put in the mail, the issues or feelings that had aroused such wrath had already been resolved.

Today that is not the case; the availability and affordability of technological resources provide an avenue for an instant outlet for our frustrations, but with potentially profound and permanent outcomes.

For today’s youth the risks are even more significant. School-age children are growing up with technology as an ever-present facet of their lives. They have no idea what it means not to have a computer with access to entertainment, friends, and enemies. They don’t know what it was like to take a photograph and not be able to see the results immediately. And they have no experience in developing and managing meaningful relationships without the use of technology as a key relationship-building tool.

Most important, without being taught good digital citizenship they are likely to engage in behaviors that will hinder healthy social and emotional development, and to make mistakes that can negatively impact them for the rest of their lives.

With 80 percent of teens reporting exposure to explicit materials online, and given our understanding of the significant psychological impact of such exposure, some schools and communities have given much attention to this matter.

There is no question, though, that issues surrounding technology-based social engagement, including online aggression, have been under-addressed in our community. To clarify, this is not just an Internet issue but a technology-based digital citizenship one.

Though they overlap, Internet safety and digital citizenship are not synonymous terms. While Internet safety identifies ways of steering clear of potentially damaging content on the web, digital citizenship seeks to educate individuals on ethical and socially acceptable norms of interaction in the digital realm. Just as we don’t hand over car keys to an adolescent without teaching him the rules of the road through required safety classes and practice runs, we should not be handing over the keys to technology without doing similar due diligence.

The research suggests an increased dependence on technology for social connectivity in adolescents. A study conducted by the cellular technology industry found that nearly 80 percent of adolescents aged 13-19 have a mobile device, and nearly half of them somewhat or strongly agreed that their cellphone was the key ingredient to their social life.

Ironically, a recent Kent State University study suggests that avid cellphone use in college-age students is associated with higher levels of anxiety and lower subjective well-being and academic performance. The data from these studies may give some insight into a new phenomenon known as texting addiction, where the compulsion to send texts and the need to receive them becomes so strong that it interferes with normal daily functioning. In many instances, despite the repeated requests of friends for the text addict to stop sending them texts, the addict cannot control himself as it represents such a powerful connection to social engagement.

Text addiction takes on an additional component in the Orthodox Jewish community through what has been termed “Half-Shabbos.” Half-Shabbos is when otherwise observant adolescents do not refrain from maintaining social relationships through social networking applications and texting on Shabbos. A recent Yeshiva University study found that nearly 18 percent of students at Modern Orthodox yeshivot report texting on Shabbos. Other anecdotal data indicates the issue is not unique to the Modern Orthodox community.

A 2011 Pew study found that 95 percent of all teens ages 12-17 are online. Some 80 percent of those online teens are users of social media sites and 88 percent of them have witnessed other people being mean or cruel online; a significant majority of them report ignoring such behavior. Cyber bullying and online aggression can have tragic consequences. In 2011 and during the first four months of 2012 there were 18 cases of adolescent suicides related to cyber bullying. This growing phenomenon should be of great concern to parents, educators and mental health professionals alike, as it really brings into focus the need for a formalized educational program of digital citizenship.

There are those who will say this is not a pressing issue in the Orthodox community; that certainly fewer than 95 percent of our teens are online and fewer than 80 percent of those teens are using social media. I would agree with them. This does not mean, however, that digital aggression does not require our attention. Even if we assume the rates are half that of the secular population, would anyone argue this is not worth addressing?

A recent study found cyber bullying to be present at a rate of roughly 10.5 percent in Jewish middle schools. While we might expect the numbers to be lower among segments of the Orthodox population that generally do not have Internet access, we would also expect the numbers to be lower in schools that have dual curricula with a strong emphasis on Jewish values and behavior. Furthermore, since most cyber bullying occurs via text message, not having Internet in the home is not enough to produce good digital citizens.

Cyber bullying is not the only issue associated with good digital citizenship. Other forms of online aggression can be problematic for today’s youth. Threatening posts, e-mails or messages can have consequences that are profound and even permanent. It is the nature of adolescents to be impulsive, to test boundaries, to make and learn from their mistakes. But it is the responsibility of parents and educators to mitigate the potential consequences of those mistakes through education, mentoring, and modeling.

Children need to be made aware of what behaviors are acceptable and what behaviors are not in a digital realm. Children need to know that their actions via an electronic medium can usually not be undone, that the potential reach of a single act of digital aggression is immeasurable, and that the effect on a victim could be tragic.

We need to promote healthy face-to-face socialization opportunities to reduce dependence on technology for social interactions.

While we are fortunate that, to my knowledge, there have not been any fatal incidents in our community as a result of cyber bullying or deficits in digital citizenship, we should not wait until a tragedy occurs to address this critical issue.

It is our responsibility to educate and be educated about how technology impacts our lives – both positively and negatively – and provide to our children and community the necessary tools to succeed in being good digital citizens.

About the Author: Dr. Eli Shapiro is a licensed clinical social worker with a doctorate in education. He writes and lectures on issues related to children, adolescents and family functioning. He recently delivered a presentation on cyber bullying in yeshiva middle schools at Nefesh International’s annual conference. He can be reached through his website, elishapiro.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “The Case for Teaching Digital Citizenship”

  1. The breakdown in human connections is the real problem today. In the digital age, it's easier to dehumanize people or to lose our ability to empathize with others who are suffering (like how some snipers say it's easier to kill a person when looking through a scope, because the scope acts like a buffer). Another danger not mentioned is how many potential psychopaths and other anti-socials are being created in online video-game arenas. In these testosterone charged environments, sodomy and rape are part of the "trash-talking". It's nothing to run into a six year old kid playing Grand Theft Auto online and to hear the kid being bullied by an adult that's referencing sodomy in front of the kid if not making the threat itself. While I don't believe these games create psychopaths, I think the online environments of these games contribute to anti-social behavior or reinforce what behavioral problems the player may already have, including a lack of empathy for the people in the world around them – digital or not. For a demographic that already has trouble with impulse control (males from 13-35 or whatever), it may be a bad idea to condition them with games that reward a hair-trigger. Most gamers are decent people, but the media needs to do more to create empathy in the viewers and definitely the gamers.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry .
NYT Ignores US Condemnation of PA Incitement, Prints Info on Ferguson Cop
Latest Indepth Stories
Kessim (religious leaders) mark the opening of a synagogue in the village of Gomenge, Ethopia, one of five built in Gondar with JDC aid, 1988
Courtesy of American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, New York.

In a world where people question whether they should be engaged, we are a reminder that all Jews are responsible for one another.

Greiff-112814-Levaya

My son is seventeen; he didn’t want to talk about what happened, or give any details of the Rosh Yeshiva’s words of chizuk.

Protesters in Ferguson, Missouri

All involved in the Ferguson debate should learn the laws pertinent to non-Jews: the Noahide Laws.

Charley Levine

Prominent Jewish leaders acknowledged that their predecessors had mistreated the Bergson Group.

Abbas has been adding new layers of rhetoric to his tactical campaign to de-Judaize Jerusalem

The Jew’s crime is his presence.

Hamas’s love for death tried to have as many Palestinian civilians killed as possible

Israel recognizes the fabrication called a Palestinian nation; So what do we want from the Swedes?

Arab attacking Jews in the land date back a century, long before Israel was created or in control.

Creativity without clarity is not sufficient for writing. I am eternally thankful to Hashem for his gift to me.

Golden presents a compelling saga of poor but determined immigrants who fled pogroms and harsh conditions in their homelands for a better life in a land of opportunity.

It seems to us that while the Jewish entitlement to the land of Israel transcends the Holocaust, the Jewish experience during that tragic time is the most solid of foundations for these “national rights.”

Too many self-styled civil rights activists seemed determined to force, by their relentless pressure, an indictment regardless of what an investigation might turn up.

Unfortunately, at present, the rabbinate does not play a positive role in preventing abuse.

More Articles from Dr. Eli Shapiro
human digitalis

Our emotional response to events has much to do with how we process events.

disinhibition

The degree of connectivity we have with each other is unparalleled.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-case-for-teaching-digital-citizenship/2014/01/23/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: