web analytics
December 20, 2014 / 28 Kislev, 5775
 
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Why is AIPAC Suddenly Part of the Syria Strike Push?

Team Obama came down hard on AIPAC to use its political muscle to convince members of congress to vote in favor of the U.S. strike on Syria.
AIPAC has Obama's back, if not vice versa

AIPAC has Obama's back, if not vice versa

For weeks the political heavyweight, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, sat on the sidelines.  AIPAC refrained from taking a position on whether or not the United States should undertake a military strike against Syria.  Its silence continued, even following confirmation of Bashar al-Assad’s use of chemical weapons against civilians.  Then, suddenly, without warning, AIPAC announced it would come out swinging with both fists. And now we know why.

It was not a big surprise to watchers of major pro-Israel organizations that AIPAC remained silent on the question of whether the U.S. should use its force against a Middle Eastern dictator who – at the moment – was not directly threatening Israel.

At least one good reason why many pro-Israel organizations were reluctant to wade into this thicket is the inevitability that the story will then become that oh-so-popular refrain: the Jews are forcing American boys to die for them. Call that the Big Blame Theory.  We’ll get back to it in a moment.

But after weeks of silence and nearly silent no-committals from the AIPAC behemoth, the word came several days ago that AIPAC had entered the hard-core lobbying front on behalf of President Obama’s “limited, tailored” strikes on Syria.

So what happened?

What happened is politics.  No, not the Jews pushing the U.S. to fight Israel’s battles.  This one was Team Obama calling in its own chits, and asking, nah, insisting that AIPAC wind-up its many operatives and get them to start pushing hard on their congressional contacts to throw in their yes vote for the Obama strikes.

At least, that’s what 23-plus year AIPAC veteran Steven J. Rosen wrote in the article, “Pushed on the Bandwagon,” appearing in the September 4th edition of the Middle East Quarterly.

Rosen’s article was long on specifics but short on sources.

Nevertheless, it is hard to believe he would write those specifics without having very sound reasons to believe them to be true.  Rosen wrote about AIPAC’s desperate effort to ensure that no one would blame “the Jews” for pushing the U.S. into a war with Iraq: AIPAC never openly endorsed the authorization; AIPAC organized a letter from 16 members of congress swearing that AIPAC did not take an official position on the war and never lobbied them on the war; former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon warned George W. Bush that attacking Iraq was a mistake.

Of course, none of those efforts to prove non-participation bore any fruit.  The Jews, by whatever name people chose to use – the Israel Lobby, the Jews, or the Neocons – were and still are blamed for pushing the U.S. into a massively unpopular war with Iraq. That’s the Big Blame Theory.

And so AIPAC was going to definitely, positively, absolutely stay out of this fight.  As with Iraq, Syria is not the threat to Israel that Iran is.  And AIPAC has always (at least until now) refrained from using its mighty political strength for any fight in which Israel is not directly threatened.  But now all that has changed.

As Rosen put it,

Responding to a full-court press by the Obama administration — a call to Netanyahu, a direct message to AIPAC, and messages via congressional leaders — AIPAC has weighed in fully in support of the president’s call for intervention.

There are a myriad of responses to AIPAC’s appearance in the front line of the congressional battle on behalf of  Obama’s Syrian Strike. Many analysts see only bad results for AIPAC and the pro-Israel world, no matter what happens.

It’s a classic example of heads you win, tails I lose.  If congress authorizes Obama’s plan, and things go badly – who is going to be blamed?  The Jews.  If congress votes against Obama’s plan, AIPAC looks feeble, and loses credibility as well as having wasted political chits it would have preferred to save for when Israel is directly threatened.

Something Rosen doesn’t mention, but others do, is the awkward realization that although team Obama has apparently pushed hard on AIPAC to help bring in the votes for the president’s plan, other, more logical organizations have been immune from the importuning.

In an article published Monday, the day after word came out about Obama’s push on AIPAC, Ed Lasky asks some very pointed questions:

where are all those Arab-American groups? Why don’t we read articles about them working on Congressmen? Why hasn’t the White House pressured them to become involved in this effort? After all, it is their people being murdered by the tens of thousands. At the very least it would reduce charges about Jews and Israel and Washington — even if Arab-American groups don’t have as much sway as other groups.

Aren’t these the various groups that raise hell when there is even a whiff of prejudice towards Muslims?  Barack Obama has constantly hosted these groups in the White House — and not just to celebrate Muslim holidays. The White House has their contact information and has close relationships with them.

Another conservative political commentator made a similar point.  Richard Baehr, in an article in Israel HaYom, pointed out that Obama has not even employed his own personal lobbying group, Organizing for America, to lobby members of congress on behalf of his Syria Plan.

Those are worthwhile points to consider, although, a small amendment should be noted: the Muslim Public Affairs Council came out publicly in favor of American intervention against Syria, in the wake of Assad’s use of chemical weapons.

But whether or not Rosen believes it is “fair” to call on AIPAC to put its neck on the line for yet another wildly unpopular U.S. military effort, he ultimately concludes it is sufficiently important for the U.S. to follow through on its stated commitment to act, given Assad’s crossing Obama’s red line.

While many ridicule secretary of state John Kerry’s description of the proposed American attack as a “teeny weeny” strike, Rosen believes that even a limited attack, one which “destroys Syria’s aircraft and helicopters, degrades its air defenses and disables its runways, would be a benefit to Israel and the region — no matter who emerges victorious there.”

Rendering worthless Syria’s air force infrastructure surely responds to, if not entirely disables, the argument for sitting out this fight because either side is monstrous.

Rosen believes America’s failure to act “will be a disaster for the Middle East and the world, and it may be impossible to contain the damage.”

And Rosen goes further. “Israel’s permanent reality is that it lives in that very bad neighborhood, faced with an existential crisis and a Syrian civil war in danger of spiraling out of control.” Rosen says that is why an overwhelming majority of Israelis hope that Obama succeeds in convincing congress to act.

And even if the U.S. decides to accept Russia’s offer to “guarantee” Syria will turn over all its chemical weapons to the international community – an idea that seemed to erupt from U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s mouth without his having thought it through in advance – the political maneuvers and AIPAC’s role, its response and its being held hostage, are well worth consideration.

Next time someone asks whether Obama has Israel’s back, the likely answer may well be, “no, but AIPAC has Obama’s.”

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

28 Responses to “Why is AIPAC Suddenly Part of the Syria Strike Push?”

  1. Charna Carole Ball says:

    where is J street on this? i don’t hear a word…..

  2. where is J street on this? i don’t hear a word…..

  3. Ronald Taylor says:

    What I want to know, is why Israel wants to support the Muslim brotherhood and Alqaida? The first thing they started doing in Egypt when those people took over was to call for “A million martyrs to Jerusalem”.

  4. What I want to know, is why Israel wants to support the Muslim brotherhood and Alqaida? The first thing they started doing in Egypt when those people took over was to call for “A million martyrs to Jerusalem”.

  5. Ben II says:

    AIPAC are Democrat & Obama shills. These people are the same jerks who pushed Israel to make concessions & cede land to Islamic terrorists.

  6. Ben II says:

    AIPAC are Democrat & Obama shills. These people are the same jerks who pushed Israel to make concessions & cede land to Islamic terrorists.

  7. Frédéric Charles Schultz says:

    They also supported attacking Iraq.wrong both times.both wars would hurt Israel! And now the Shia iraqis we freed are now threatening to attack us if we attack the Syrian shia muslims! And Iran is threatening to attack Israel if USA attacks the Shia, while Israel has never taken sides in Islamic civil war! AIPAC is very very wrong here! Israel will suffer greatly if USA attacks Syria and do will USA. Could start a world war! Praying for peace! For a negotiated ceasefire, now!

  8. They also supported attacking Iraq.wrong both times.both wars would hurt Israel! And now the Shia iraqis we freed are now threatening to attack us if we attack the Syrian shia muslims! And Iran is threatening to attack Israel if USA attacks the Shia, while Israel has never taken sides in Islamic civil war! AIPAC is very very wrong here! Israel will suffer greatly if USA attacks Syria and do will USA. Could start a world war! Praying for peace! For a negotiated ceasefire, now!

  9. Nina Davar says:

    AIPAC is full of leftwing nut jobs. They stand with Israel about as much as Oblunder does. They’re dispicable!

  10. Nina Davar says:

    AIPAC is full of leftwing nut jobs. They stand with Israel about as much as Oblunder does. They’re dispicable!

  11. . Senator Harry Reid has just compared the situation in Syria with that of the Holocaust. There is no comparison since this is a civil war and no one can definitely state which side is using chemical warfare, if not both. Syria is a quagmire. We will get into it and not have an exit strategy. If we are going to war it should be against Iran; declaring war on Syria is basically fighting Iran. I predict this war will end up like Iraq, which I was also against, with boots on the ground and many young American lives lost. I do not know President Obama personally nor have I ever met him. My position regarding his leadership abilities and policies has never changed. He does not have the ability to be a commander in chief and has lost credibility throughout the world. The TV pictures showing the massacre of women and children have not been verified as originating from one side of this civil war. The only way out of this is the position that Secretary of State made at a press conference, whether he meant it or not, that there should be an international committee to verify the source of chemical warfare. Putin immediately came up with the same suggestion and offered it to Syria. This is the way out for our president, and if it can be worked out, a way to resolve this crisis. Hillary Clinton had also suggested this solution.

    Before we have the beginnings of what could lead to WORLD WAR 3 , can you assure me that the other side does not have chemical weapons also. Please guarantee there will be no boots on the ground and that Israel will not be attacked immediately. Please tell me we are ready to send our children or grandchildren to war and have more American men and women die.

    It’s pretty obvious that if the opposition gets into power and has nerve gas, they’d use it, too. It is naïve to think that there are major differences between the Syrian sides. Remember what has been going on in Egypt. The world, especially President Obama, enthusiastically praised the change of regime and “democratic elections” in which Mohammed Morsi was elected president. He didn’t last very long, because the Egyptian public is volatile and the same is true in Syria. We should stay out of this conflict. RABBI DR. BERNHARD ROSENBERG

  12. AIPAC should stay out of it, another Jewish blunder. Who are they to assume that the rest of the Jewish community agrees with their decision.

  13. AIPAC should stay out of it, another Jewish blunder. Who are they to assume that the rest of the Jewish community agrees with their decision.

  14. Cody Flecker says:

    It's very simple.. 72% of the eligible Jewish voters in 2008 and 2012 voted for the anti semitic Obama and the Democratic Party. Who else would the anti seimite ask, but the people he hates so much to help him in this Sitzkreig of his, but AIPAC? The Jews are their own worst enemy. In Israel we see this every day unfold, so why not in the USA?

  15. AIPAC is a whole lot like the state of Israel, they suck up to Obama whenever possible. Their original stance was totally correct but they have no faith in their own supposed power – not unlike the Israelis who have made themselves into a Banana Republic and sooner or later will have to shed that mentality no matter how much it may hurt initially.

  16. Abe Strahl says:

    here come the anti semites out of their holes and woodwork…do you really believe that little israel has the power to influence the u.s.a, u.k., e.u. u.n., and the rest of the world to do anything? these creeps willcome out with anything…as long as it is ant israel or ant semitic…but remember….we all have our day of judgement…and you vicious jerks can not and will not escape it.

  17. Alan Kardon says:

    Why would you think that the Jews and Israel will not get blamed for what is happening in Syria. Wake up folks, we stand alone in this world.

  18. I strenuously object to Jewish organizations lobbying for US military action that does not concern Israel directly.

    Now, we will all be tarred-and-feathered for trying to push Congress to pass an action that most Americans do not want.

    Now, that a deal is likely in place to turn over Syria's chemical weaponry, AIPAC and the Jews are left to twist in the wind.

    Thank you for wasting goodwill that may be necessary if Israel is in real danger.

    Sucking up to the President when the possibility looms of the military fighting a war that could, if things go badly awry, cause our soldiers, sailors, and marines to take casualties, was a very stupid idea.

    For the love of God, do not be used in such a fashion again!

  19. Robin Rosenblatt says:

    AIPAC has betrayed Israel.

  20. Moshe Ben Yitzhak says:

    No easy decisions in DC these days. Definitely, this is the hardest Obama has had to work in the last five years! I guess all we can hope for is that a AUMF is unnecessary in Syria, and that AIPAC's willingness to support Obama today is repaid when we get down to brass tacks on Iran.

  21. Anonymous says:

    Again Netanyahu has not the balls to say "no" to the AIPAC and Obama, is better for Israel to be in the same side with Assad, Hezbollah, Iran, Russia and shiites than Obama, Al Qaeda ans sunnies, that is that the US should not get involved any way in Syria's civil war, let them resolve their problems killing each other, for Israel is the best opportunity not get involved saying "yes" to Obama at the same time to Al Qaeda and Sunnies.

  22. Anonymous says:

    Not only Al Qaeda an Sunnies also muslims brotherhood and the jihad's, they are the really enemies of Israel.

  23. Anonymous says:

    And Puttin is a better friend to Israel than Obama, he will protect Israel.

  24. Morry Barak says:

    AIPAC is nothing but a bunch of self serving organization Jews. The Jewish people & Israel would be better off without them.

  25. Randall R. Snyder Jr. says:

    AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know

  26. Randall R. Snyder Jr. says:

    AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know

  27. Rhonda Kelley says:

    America is not in control nor is any country or principality. FEAR GOD, or die.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Posted to Twitter in Ferguson, MO by St. Louis County Police: "Bricks thrown at police, 2 police cars burned, gun seized by police. Tonight was disappointing."  Their motto is, "To protect and serve."
Prosecutor in Ferguson Case: ‘Witnesses Lied Under Oath’
Latest News Stories
Posted to Twitter in Ferguson, MO by St. Louis County Police: "Bricks thrown at police, 2 police cars burned, gun seized by police. Tonight was disappointing."  Their motto is, "To protect and serve."

Prosecutor in Ferguson case said ‘some witnesses lied under oath’ to support officer’s version of events.

Arab youth shoot fireworks during clashes with Border Police in Shuafat in Jerusalem.

PA Arabs are continuing near-daily clashes with IDF soldiers; on Friday, fierce fighting broke out after sermons at mosques.

False Alarm 2

Rocket fire was directed by Gaza terrorists at southern Israel’s Eshkol district on Friday for the third time since the summer.

Hamas on Temple Mount

Police must have been too busy arresting Jewish children to notice the Hamas rally on the Temple Mount today.

Was top Hezbollah terrorist a spy for Israel?

Reshet Bet has released their latest election poll…

Radical US Jewish lawyer involved in attempt to unite terrorists.

Israelis will Celiac disease will now be allowed to join combat units.

Teenager attacked Jews on their way to holy site.

Four in serious condition; doctors not sure why.

Liberman and Kachlon may merge right after elections – and the larger party will recommend Liberman for Prime Minister to the President.

A Chabad rabbinic student stabbed in “770″ has returned home from the hospital.

Arabs attacked an Israeli bus traveling between Arad and Be’er Sheva along Highway 31 Thursday evening.

The UN General Assembly approves resolution to refer N. Korea to the Intl Criminal Court at The Hague.

Israeli soldiers stand guard near large public menorah near the site where Dalia Lemkus, 26, was stabbed to death at a bus stop near the entrance to Alon Shvut last month.

US teachers are learning “3-D printing” from the Dept. of Defense.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Posted to Twitter in Ferguson, MO by St. Louis County Police: "Bricks thrown at police, 2 police cars burned, gun seized by police. Tonight was disappointing."  Their motto is, "To protect and serve."

Prosecutor in Ferguson case said ‘some witnesses lied under oath’ to support officer’s version of events.

The Harvard seal, "veritas," on the side of a Harvard building.

Harvard announced it will “look into” its boycott of SodaStream. But will it remove the boycott?

Harvard boycotts SodaStream to avoid offense to Palestinian Arab students.

Report determines mosque fire blamed on “Jewish settlers” was actually an electrical fire.

Hundreds of schoolchildren killed or wounded in Taliban attack on Pakistani school.

Former AP correspondent exposes the shoddiness of modern journalism, especially about Israel.

Islamist terrorists have taken 13 hostage in a chocolates cafe in Sydney, Australia.

AQAP claims it hit an airbase in Yemen where American advisers are located.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/why-is-aipac-suddenly-part-of-the-syria-strike-push/2013/09/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: